The Progressivity Of The First Income Tax In The United Kingdom: Data From 1799/1800 And 1815/1816

Authors

  • Alexander Gelardi University of St. Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.41.1743

Abstract

William Pitt the Younger’s government introduced a national income tax in the United Kingdom in 1799 to help pay for the war against France.  When the war ended, income tax was repealed.  The tax was unpopular from the beginning and was regarded as being unfair.  Progressivity is generally regarded as being a measure of equity. This research looks at the progressivity at the beginning and end of the first UK income tax.  Both the Suits and Kakwani indices are used to measure the level of progressivity.  It was found that at the beginning the tax was very progressive for taxpayers.  However, by the time it was repealed it, the level of progressivity was much reduced.

Author Biography

Alexander Gelardi, University of St. Thomas

Professor, Opus College of Business

References

Anonymous, 1799. Observations, etc. upon the Act for Taxing Income in Which the Principles and Provisions of the Act are fully Considered etc. etc.” London: Bunney and Gold.

Brunt L. and Meidell, E. (n.d.) “How fast and how broad was British industrialization? Evidence from a synthetic occupational census for 1801” Working Paper NHH Bergen.

Clark, G. (n.d.). Farm Wages and Living Standards in the Industrial Revolution: England, 1670<1850. Working Paper Series. University of California

Commissioners of Inland Revenue, 1857. First Report of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue on Inland Revenue, London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

Corbett, W.J. 1901. “The Agricultural Revolution” in Social England, vol II.I, Eds. Trail, H.D. and J.S. Mann, Cassel and Co Ltd.

Curtler, W.H.R. 1909. A Short History of English Agriculture. Oxford: Clarendon Press Dunbar, A. and S. Nordhauser. 1991. “Is the child Care Credit Progressive?” National Tax Journal 44 pp. 519<528.

Field, J. F. 2013 “Domestic Wages: Domestic service, gender, and wages in rural England, c.1700–1860.” The Economic History Review 66, 1, pp. 249–272.

Gibbon, E. 1776:1909. the Decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Reprinted, ed. J.B. Bury, London: Methuen and Co.

Hansard. T.C. 1816a. The Parliamentary Debates from the year 1803 to the Present Time. HC deb. 18 March 1816, Vol 33. Cols. 421<451.

Hansard. T.C. 1816b. The Parliamentary Debates from the year 1803 to the Present Time. HC deb. 30 May 1816, Vol 34. Cols. 928<929.

James, S. and C. Nobes. 1992. The Economics of Taxation, 4h ed. London: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Kakwani, N.C., 1977. “Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison.” Economic Journal 87

Gelardi, A. M. G. (2016). The Progressivity of the First Income Tax in the United Kingdom: Data from 1799/1800 and 1815/1816. Archives)of)

Kakwani, N.C. 1987. “Measures of Tax Progressivity and Redistribution Effects: A Comment.” Public Finance. 42, 3: 431<434.

Marshall, J. 1833. Digest of all the Accounts relating to Population, Productions, Revenues, and Financial Operations Etc. Ed. J. Marshall, London: J Haddon.

Loizides, I. 1988. The Decomposition of Progressivity Indices with Applications to the Greek Taxation System. Public Finance. 43, 2: 236<247.

Luttman, S. and R. Spindle. 1994. “An Evaluation of the Revenue and Equity Effects of Converting Exemptions and Itemized Deductions to a Single Non

Plutarch. C.100:1992. Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Reprinted in Great Books series, Encyclopædia Britannica.

Ricketts, R. C. 1990. “Social Security Growth versus Income Tax Reform: An Analysis of Progressivity and Horizontal Equity in the Federal Tax System.” Journal of the American Taxation Association. 11, pp. 34<50.

Sabine, B.E.V. 1966. A History of Income Tax. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Seetharaman, A. 1994. An Isolation of the Effects of Personal Deductions, Tax Credits, and the Tax Rate Schedule on U.S. Individual Income Tax Progressivity and Income Inequity. The Journal of the American Taxation Association. 16 (spring): 101<121.

Seetharaman, A. and G.S. Iyer. 1995. “A Comparison of Alternative Measures of Tax Progressivity: The Case of the Child and Dependent Care Credit”. The Journal of the American Taxation Association. 17 (spring): 42<70.

Seligman, E.R.A. 1911. The Income Tax: A Study of the History, Theory, and Practice of Income Tax at Home and Abroad. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Senior, C. 1863. Hand

Shehab, F. 1953. Progressive Taxation. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Smith, A. 1776:1963: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Reprinted. Chicago: Irwin.

Smith, P. 1991. “Lessons from the British Poll Tax Disaster”. National Tax Journal. 44 (December): pp. 421<436.

Slemrod, J. and J. Bakija. 1996. Taxing Ourselves: A Citizen's Guide to the Great Debate Over Tax Reform. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Suits, D. 1977. “The Measurement of Tax Progressivity.” The American Economic Review 67(4) pp. 747<752

Tayler, W. 1853. The History of the Taxation of England. London: Hope & Co.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-21

How to Cite

Gelardi, A. (2016). The Progressivity Of The First Income Tax In The United Kingdom: Data From 1799/1800 And 1815/1816. Archives of Business Research, 4(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.41.1743