A Decomposition-based Integration Approach to Business Modeling

Authors

  • Shuichiro Yamamoto International Professional University of Technology in Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1307.19137

Keywords:

Business Modeling Method, Method Integration, Value Proposition Canvas, Minimum viable product, Customer journey map

Abstract

As information technology has become more deeply ingrained in society, many business modeling methods have developed rapidly. On the other hand, new problems have arisen, such as how to use different business modeling methods appropriately. In this paper, we propose an integration method for creating new business modeling methods by breaking down existing business modeling methods into elements and recombining them, based on the assumption that common elements exist in business modeling methods. We also evaluate the effectiveness of this business modeling method by applying it to multiple business modeling methods.

References

Nonaka I., A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 1994. 5(1), p.14-37.

Sana Bent Aboulkacem Guetat and Salem Ben Dhaou Dakhli, A Framework for Integration of Knowledge and Innovation Processes, 2013. p.1-11.

Yamamoto, S., Enterprise Architecture Towards Transdisciplinary Knowledge Unification, Advanced Applied Informatics, 8th International Congress on, 2019. p.833-838.

Ladewig, G., TRIZ: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, The PDMA ToolBook 3 for New Product Development, 2007. John Wiley and Sons.

Yamamoto, S., Enterprise Requirements Management Knowledge towards Digital Transformation, 2017. ICITCS2017, p.309-317.

Yamamoto, S., Deployment of the Knowledge Integration towards the Digital Transformation, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20801/jsrpim.35.2_253 (in Japanese)

Yamamoto, S., A Comparative Analysis of Business Model Notations, Journal of Business Theory and Practice ISSN 2372-9759 (Print) ISSN 2329-2644 (Online), 2019. 7(3), p.111-123.

Koyama, S., Tsuji, Y., Masuda, R., Onoda, H., Ono, H., Natsuyama, M., Endo, T., Iwasa, K., & Yamamoto, S., A Technique to Integrate Service Business Models with ArchiMate, Procedia Computer Science, 2023. 219, p.479–485 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.315

Yamamoto, S., A Research Creation Model, 25th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, Procedia Computer Science, 2021. 192, p.1813-1820, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.186 76 Yamamoto, S. (2025). A Decomposition-based Integration Approach to Business Modeling. Archives of Business Research, 13(07). 67-77.

Yamamoto, S., Digital SDGs Framework towards Knowledge Integration, Intelligent Decision Technologies 16, 2022. p.757–767. DOI 10.3233/IDT-220276 IOS Press

Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A., & Papadakos, T., Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want., 2014. John Wiley & Sons.

Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y., Visualizing business model evolution with the Business Model Canvas: Concept and tool., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014.p.165–181.

Ries, E. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses., 2011. Crown Publishing.

Patrício, L., Fisk, R. P., Falcão e Cunha, J., & Constantine, L., Multilevel service design: From customer value constellation to service experience blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 2011.14(2), 180–200.

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 2016. 80(6), 69–96.

Row, P. G., Design thinking., 1987. MIT Press.

Norman, D. A., The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. ,2013. Basic Books.

Checkland, P., Systems thinking, systems practice., 1981.John Wiley & Sons.

Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J., The goal: A process of ongoing improvement.,1984. North River Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

How to Cite

Yamamoto, S. (2025). A Decomposition-based Integration Approach to Business Modeling. Archives of Business Research, 13(07), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1307.19137