Preparatory Release Capacity: A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Pre-Arrival Bail Planning Under Uncertainty

Authors

  • Michael J. Douglas, Ph.D. Department of Management, Marketing and Information Technology, Lombardo College of Business, Millersville University of Pennsylvania, United States https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7119-8595
  • Eric S. Kyper, Ph.D. Douglas D. Drysdale Professor of Business and Economics, University of Lynchburg, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1411.12599

Keywords:

bail, decision support systems, design science research, Monte Carlo simulation, pretrial detention, Preparatory Release Capacity

Abstract

Monetary-bail decisions create a difficult planning problem because individuals may need to prepare for release before a court establishes whether bail will be imposed or the amount required. This study develops and evaluates a decision support system (DSS) for comparing pre-arrival preparation strategies under uncertainty. The artifact introduces Preparatory Release Capacity (PRC), defined as the combined liquidity readiness, coordination readiness, and funding certainty assembled before surrender. PRC is operationalized as a 0 to 6 index independent of simulated outcomes. The DSS uses Monte Carlo simulation with common random numbers to compare seven strategies across four synthetic bail environments calibrated to published national benchmarks. A 20,000-draw analysis generated 560,000 strategy-scenario observations. In unconstrained analyses, prepaid preparation minimized modeled initial detention in all environments, saving 2.67 to 7.69 hours relative to no preparation. Under a $300 expected-cost constraint, recommendations shifted across environments, demonstrating context-sensitive decision support. PRC was strongly associated with lower modeled initial detention, lower funding-shortfall probability, and greater hours saved. Across 48 sensitivity conditions, the modeled-delay-minimizing recommendation remained stable, while premium rates altered cost-effectiveness and coordination delays altered the magnitude of detention reduction. The artifact contributes a transparent, reproducible framework for evaluating preparation under uncertain release conditions while explicitly separating judicial decisions from post-decision coordination and liquidity mechanisms. The artifact is calibrated to the United States pretrial justice system and should not be interpreted as representing bail practices in all jurisdictions.

References

Advancing Pretrial Policy & Research. (2024). Pretrial detention: Pretrial research summary. https://www.advancingpretrial.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/PretrialDetentionResearchSummary_updated-April-2024.pdf

Arnold, D., Dobbie, W., & Hull, P. (2022). Measuring racial discrimination in bail decisions. American Economic Review, 112(9), 2992-3038. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200416

Carroll, J. E. (2023). The ever-shifting ground of pretrial detention reform. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120122-092655

Cohen, T. H., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2010). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2006 (NCJ 228944). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/ascii/fdluc06.txt

Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A multi-disciplinary and comparative approach to evaluating pre-trial detention decisions: Towards evidence-based reform. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0

Didwania, S. H. (2020). The immediate consequences of federal pretrial detention. American Law and Economics Review, 22(1), 24-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahz012

Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018). The effects of pretrial detention on conviction, future crime, and employment: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. American Economic Review, 108(2), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161503

Grau, N., Marivil, G., & Rivera, J. (2023). The effect of pretrial detention on labor market outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 39(2), 283-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09535-4

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148625

Hood, K., & Schneider, D. (2019). Bail and pretrial detention: Contours and causes of temporal and county variation. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 126-149. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.1.06

Kenney, J. L., & Dolliver, M. J. (2022). Time to bail out: Examining gender differences in the length of pretrial detention using survival analysis. Justice System Journal, 43(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2022.2042432

Larsen, K. R., Lukyanenko, R., Mueller, R. M., Storey, V. C., VanderMeer, D., Parsons, J., & Hovorka, D. S. (2020). Validity in design science research. In S. Hofmann, O. Müller, & M. Rossi (Eds.), Designing for digital transformation: Co-creating services with citizens and industry (LNCS 12388, pp. 272-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_25

Mazurek, J., & Strzałka, D. (2022). On the Monte Carlo weights in multiple criteria decision analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0268950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268950

Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38(11), 2074-2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086

Moutinho, J. D. A., Fernandes, G., & Rabechini, R., Jr. (2024). Evaluation in design science: A framework to support project studies in the context of university research centres. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102, 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102366

Müller, J., Würth, S., Schäffer, T., & Leyh, C. (2024). Toward a framework for determining methods of evaluation in design science research. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (pp. 231-236). https://doi.org/10.15439/2024F7208

Ouss, A., & Stevenson, M. (2023). Does cash bail deter misconduct? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 15(3), 150-182. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210349

Page, J., & Scott-Hayward, C. S. (2022). Bail and pretrial justice in the United States: A field of possibility. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-093024

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

Rabuy, B., & Kopf, D. (2016). Detaining the poor: How money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/incomejails.html

Rempel, M., Lu, O., & Monaghan, S. (2026). Bail reform at five years: Pretrial decision-making in New York State. Data Collaborative for Justice, John Jay College of Criminal Justice. https://datacollaborativeforjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Pretrial_DM_Report_Final.pdf

Smith, S. S. (2022). How pretrial incarceration diminishes individuals’ employment prospects. Federal Probation, 86(3), 11-18. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/86_3_3_0.pdf

Stevenson, M., & Mayson, S. G. (2017). Pretrial detention and bail. In E. Luna (Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: Pretrial and trial processes (Vol. 3, pp. 21-43). Academy for Justice.

Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2026). Release mechanism and pretrial failure in large urban counties. Social Sciences, 15(6), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060395

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2022). The civil rights implications of cash bail. https://www.usccr.gov/reports/2021/civil-rights-implications-cash-bail

van Eijk, G. (2020). Inclusion and exclusion through risk-based justice: Analysing combinations of risk assessment from pretrial detention to release. British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 1080-1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa012

Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

Zottola, S. A., & Desmarais, S. L. (2022). Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 46(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000487

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Douglas, M., & Kyper, E. (2026). Preparatory Release Capacity: A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Pre-Arrival Bail Planning Under Uncertainty. Archives of Business Research, 14(11), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1411.12599