Preparatory Release Capacity: A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Pre-Arrival Bail Planning Under Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1411.12599Keywords:
bail, decision support systems, design science research, Monte Carlo simulation, pretrial detention, Preparatory Release CapacityAbstract
Monetary-bail decisions create a difficult planning problem because individuals may need to prepare for release before a court establishes whether bail will be imposed or the amount required. This study develops and evaluates a decision support system (DSS) for comparing pre-arrival preparation strategies under uncertainty. The artifact introduces Preparatory Release Capacity (PRC), defined as the combined liquidity readiness, coordination readiness, and funding certainty assembled before surrender. PRC is operationalized as a 0 to 6 index independent of simulated outcomes. The DSS uses Monte Carlo simulation with common random numbers to compare seven strategies across four synthetic bail environments calibrated to published national benchmarks. A 20,000-draw analysis generated 560,000 strategy-scenario observations. In unconstrained analyses, prepaid preparation minimized modeled initial detention in all environments, saving 2.67 to 7.69 hours relative to no preparation. Under a $300 expected-cost constraint, recommendations shifted across environments, demonstrating context-sensitive decision support. PRC was strongly associated with lower modeled initial detention, lower funding-shortfall probability, and greater hours saved. Across 48 sensitivity conditions, the modeled-delay-minimizing recommendation remained stable, while premium rates altered cost-effectiveness and coordination delays altered the magnitude of detention reduction. The artifact contributes a transparent, reproducible framework for evaluating preparation under uncertain release conditions while explicitly separating judicial decisions from post-decision coordination and liquidity mechanisms. The artifact is calibrated to the United States pretrial justice system and should not be interpreted as representing bail practices in all jurisdictions.
References
Advancing Pretrial Policy & Research. (2024). Pretrial detention: Pretrial research summary. https://www.advancingpretrial.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/PretrialDetentionResearchSummary_updated-April-2024.pdf
Arnold, D., Dobbie, W., & Hull, P. (2022). Measuring racial discrimination in bail decisions. American Economic Review, 112(9), 2992-3038. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200416
Carroll, J. E. (2023). The ever-shifting ground of pretrial detention reform. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120122-092655
Cohen, T. H., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2010). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2006 (NCJ 228944). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/ascii/fdluc06.txt
Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A multi-disciplinary and comparative approach to evaluating pre-trial detention decisions: Towards evidence-based reform. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0
Didwania, S. H. (2020). The immediate consequences of federal pretrial detention. American Law and Economics Review, 22(1), 24-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahz012
Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018). The effects of pretrial detention on conviction, future crime, and employment: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. American Economic Review, 108(2), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161503
Grau, N., Marivil, G., & Rivera, J. (2023). The effect of pretrial detention on labor market outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 39(2), 283-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09535-4
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148625
Hood, K., & Schneider, D. (2019). Bail and pretrial detention: Contours and causes of temporal and county variation. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 126-149. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.1.06
Kenney, J. L., & Dolliver, M. J. (2022). Time to bail out: Examining gender differences in the length of pretrial detention using survival analysis. Justice System Journal, 43(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2022.2042432
Larsen, K. R., Lukyanenko, R., Mueller, R. M., Storey, V. C., VanderMeer, D., Parsons, J., & Hovorka, D. S. (2020). Validity in design science research. In S. Hofmann, O. Müller, & M. Rossi (Eds.), Designing for digital transformation: Co-creating services with citizens and industry (LNCS 12388, pp. 272-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_25
Mazurek, J., & Strzałka, D. (2022). On the Monte Carlo weights in multiple criteria decision analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0268950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268950
Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38(11), 2074-2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086
Moutinho, J. D. A., Fernandes, G., & Rabechini, R., Jr. (2024). Evaluation in design science: A framework to support project studies in the context of university research centres. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102, 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102366
Müller, J., Würth, S., Schäffer, T., & Leyh, C. (2024). Toward a framework for determining methods of evaluation in design science research. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (pp. 231-236). https://doi.org/10.15439/2024F7208
Ouss, A., & Stevenson, M. (2023). Does cash bail deter misconduct? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 15(3), 150-182. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210349
Page, J., & Scott-Hayward, C. S. (2022). Bail and pretrial justice in the United States: A field of possibility. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-093024
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Rabuy, B., & Kopf, D. (2016). Detaining the poor: How money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/incomejails.html
Rempel, M., Lu, O., & Monaghan, S. (2026). Bail reform at five years: Pretrial decision-making in New York State. Data Collaborative for Justice, John Jay College of Criminal Justice. https://datacollaborativeforjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Pretrial_DM_Report_Final.pdf
Smith, S. S. (2022). How pretrial incarceration diminishes individuals’ employment prospects. Federal Probation, 86(3), 11-18. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/86_3_3_0.pdf
Stevenson, M., & Mayson, S. G. (2017). Pretrial detention and bail. In E. Luna (Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: Pretrial and trial processes (Vol. 3, pp. 21-43). Academy for Justice.
Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2026). Release mechanism and pretrial failure in large urban counties. Social Sciences, 15(6), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060395
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2022). The civil rights implications of cash bail. https://www.usccr.gov/reports/2021/civil-rights-implications-cash-bail
van Eijk, G. (2020). Inclusion and exclusion through risk-based justice: Analysing combinations of risk assessment from pretrial detention to release. British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 1080-1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa012
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
Zottola, S. A., & Desmarais, S. L. (2022). Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 46(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000487
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael J. Douglas, Ph.D. , Eric S. Kyper, Ph.D.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.