Tourism Management Education and Cultural Identity on Learning

Authors

  • Rodolfo Delgado Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Studies, The University of Kitakyushu, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1311.19272

Keywords:

Cultural identity, learner autonomy, interactive learning, tourism education

Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of cultural identity on learning. Interactive activities such as discussions, debates, short presentations, and critical thinking are conducted during classes to increase student talk time and contribute to information exchange and the acquisition of language and knowledge in the field of tourism management. This study seeks to understand, through qualitative research, all aspects of this situation. Therefore, short surveys were conducted, several groups were created, and students’ behavior, interactions, and performance were observed in the classroom. The results of the survey are interesting because while several students were expecting a 90-minute lecture where they were going to sit and just listen, the normal learning expectation of those with a normal Japanese cultural identity, other students enjoyed the discussion within the groups and acknowledged that interactive learning added value to the content and language acquisition process because they could analyze the information studied during the lessons.

References

Adelman, M., & Lemos, R. (2021). Managing for Learning: Measuring and Strengthening Education Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1463-1

Altugan, A. S. (2015) The Relationship between Cultural Identity and Learning. ScienceDirect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186, 1159 – 1162. Elsevier.

Altugan, A. S. (2015). The Effect of Cultural Identity on Learning. ScienceDirect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 190, 455 – 458. Elsevier.

Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in Language Learning. ELT Journal, 40, 21-40.

Blidi, S. (2017) Collaborative Learner Autonomy. A Mode of Learner Autonomy Development. Springer.

Chaya, P., & Inpin, B. (2020). Effects of Integrating Movie-Based Mobile Learning Instruction for Enhancing Thai University Students’ Speaking Skills and Intercultural Communicative Competence. Canadian Center of Science and Education. English Language Teaching, 13 (7).

Coyle, D. (2011). Teacher education and CLIL methods and tools. Unpublished seminar presented in Milan, Italy. http://www.cremit.it/public/documenti/seminar.pdf

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Crabbe, D. (2007) Learning opportunities: Adding learning value to tasks. ELT Journal 61(62),118-125.

Dam, L. (2018). Learners as researchers of their own language learning: Examples from an autonomy classroom. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 9(3), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.37237/090303

Delgado, R. (2015). Critical Thinking Tasks for Developing Intercultural Communication Competence. Critical Thinking in Language Learning, 2 (1), 56-70.

Egitim, S. (2021). Collaborative leadership in English language classrooms: Engaging learners in leaderful classroom practices and strategies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-21. Taylor & Francis online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1990413

Egitim, S. (2022). Collaborative leadership through leaderful classroom practices: Everybody is a leader. Candlin & Mynard.

Gremmo, M.J., and Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System 23 (22), 151-164.

Grissom, J. A., & Condon, L. (2021). Leading Schools and Districts in Times of Crisis. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211023112

Harrop, E. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Limitations and Possibilities. Encuentro 21, 57-70.

Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.

Jones, F. (1995). Self-access and culture: Retreating from culture. ELT Journal 43 (49), 228-234.

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1. Authentic Press.

Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics 20 (21): 71-74.

Nunan, D. (1999). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in language learning. Paper presented at the ASOCOPI 2000. Conference, Cartagena. Colombia.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly 37 (34), 589-613.

Delgado, R. (2025). Tourism Management Education and Cultural Identity on Learning. Archives of Business Research, 13(11). 42-57.

OECD (2018), Education Policy in Japan: Building Bridges towards 2030, Reviews of National Policies for Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302402-en

Pont, D., Nusche, D., Hopkins, D. (2008) Improving School Leadership VOLUME 2: CASE STUDIES ON SYSTEM LEADERSHIP. OECD.

Wenden, A. 1998. Meta-cognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19(14): 515–537.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Delgado, R. (2025). Tourism Management Education and Cultural Identity on Learning. Archives of Business Research, 13(11), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1311.19272