A Case Study to Address the AACSB Curricula Management Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.512.4009Keywords:
AACSB Standard 8, business curriculum, curricula improvement modelAbstract
This paper examines a curricula management improvement process model to apply to the review of a business school core curriculum consistent with AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International) Standard 8. AACSB accredited schools are required to perform periodic curricula management review. A flexible business process model extensible to other curriculum programs is proposed. The results of the model implementation from an action-research study at a medium-size public university in the northeastern United States are discussed. AACSB requires that a continuous improvement review process for curricula management be in place. However, there is a lack of formal business processes to address how business schools can systematically manage their curriculum. This paper bridges that gap by presenting a formal approach. Lessons learned from the process and recommendations are also presented.
References
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) (2017). AACSB International accreditation continuous improvement review handbook http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/handbooks/circ-review-handbook-business-2013.ashx?la=en (Accessed September 13, 2017).
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) (2017). http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/standards/business-2017-update.ashx?la=en (Accessed September 13, 2017).
Kouns, J. and Minoli, D. (2010), Information Technology Risk Management, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Smith, H. and Finger, M., (2006), Business Process Management: The Third Wave, Megan-Kiffer Publishing. Tampa, FL.
