Financial Stability Report: Lessons From the Central Banks

Authors

  • Firano Zakaria
  • Filali Adib Fatine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.46.2492

Abstract

The economic and social costs of the financial crises are very high led the central banks to register financial stability, in addition to the price stability, in the middle of their concerns. Nevertheless, the objectives of the central banks as regards financial stability are less clear and specific that in the monetary field. This difficulty related to the abstract character and multidimensional of the concept of financial stability makes difficult to quantify an objective, to check the realization of it and complicates the communication strategy to be adopted on the matter. In spite of these difficulties, the central banks reinforced their communications as regards financial stability by the publication of Financial Stability Report (FSR). The latter describe the various risks overall weighing on the stability of the financial system and formulate a judgment on its impact strength and its capacity to reabsorb the various potential shocks. The RSF aim reinforcing the transparency on the various components of the financial system and at supporting the emergence of a framework of co-operation between the various speakers. Vis-a-Vis the stakes of financial stability, the majority of the central banks widened their missions with the maintenance of financial stability. In the same way, they recorded signification advances in the installation of the framework of financial stability (institutional, lawful, and operational). Within this framework, this paper tries to describe the practices of the central banks as regards development of the FSR and formula of the recommendations aiming at proposing an exhaustive analysis of the FSR. Initially, it presents the objectives sought through this communication strategy and examines, without going into the details, the structure adopted in the development of the RSF.

References

Irving Fisher Committee, (2005), “Data Requirements for Analyzing the Stability and Vulnerability of Mature Financial System”, BIS.

Jim Wilkinson, Kenneth Spong, and Jon Christensson, 2010 “Financial Stability Reports How Useful During a Financial Crisis?” Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City).

Jon Christensson, Kenneth Spong, and Jim Wilkinsonon, December 2010. “What Can Financial Stability Reports Tell Us about Macro prudential Supervision?” Research Working Paper No 15. (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City).

Houben, A., J. Kakes and G. Schinasi, 2004, Towards a Framework for Financial Stability, Occasional Study No. 2(1), (Nederlandsche Bank).

Lastra, Rosa Maria “How much accountability for central banks and supervisors?” Central Banking (2001), Vol.12 (2).

Martin Čihák, June 2006. “How Do Central Banks Write on Financial Stability?”, Working Paper No. 163, (IMF).

Martin Čihák, Sònia Muñoz, Shakira Teh Sharifuddin, and Kalin Tintchev, January 2012. “Financial Stability Reports: What Are They Good For? (IMF), Working Paper No 1, (IMF). 1. Financial stability report, 2012 (Swiss National Bank). 2. Financial stability report in the world (GFSR, 2012 (the IMF)). 3. Financial stability report (ECB, 2011). 4. Financial stability Review, 2012 (Central Bank of Luxembourg). 5. Financial stability report, June 2012, (Bank of England). 6. Financial stability report, 2012, (Riksbank, Banks National of Sweden). 7. Financial stability report, (Nederlandsche Bank, Banks National of the Netherlands).

Financial stability report, November 2012 (National Bank of Spain).

Financial stability report, 2012, (Norges Bank, Banks National of Norway).

Sander Oosterloo, Jakob de Haan, Richard Jong-A-Pin, (2006), “Financial stability reviews: A first empirical analysis”, Journal of Financial Stability.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-30

How to Cite

Zakaria, F., & Fatine, F. A. (2016). Financial Stability Report: Lessons From the Central Banks. Archives of Business Research, 4(6), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.46.2492