Factors Affecting the Cost Savings Rate of University Procurement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.115.14540Keywords:
Demand release channels, University procurement, Procurement efficiency, Cost reduction, Purchasing behavior, Supplier management, Procurement performanceAbstract
The procurement function is an essential part of a university’s operations, as it provides the necessary goods and services for academic and administrative activities.This paper explores the impact of different demand channels on cost savings rate in university procurement. Through surveying and analyzing the demand channels used in university procurement, this study finds that the use of multiple demand channels can improve procurement efficiency and performance, and help reduce procurement costs. Moreover, the quality of communication and information sharing between universities and suppliers, as well as the level of competition among suppliers for procurement contracts, affect the cost savings rate. The findings of this study will also provide important implications for university procurement practices, by helping universities make more informed decisions regarding the selection of procurement demand channels. Ultimately, the goal is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of university procurement practices, which can lead to cost savings, improved procurement outcomes, and increased value for money.
References
Njeru S E. Factors affecting effective implementation of Procurement Practices in tertiary public training institutions in Kenya[D]. 2015.
Ngugi J K, Mugo H W. Internal factors affecting procurement process of supplies in the public sector; a survey of Kenya government ministries[C]//5th International Public Procurement Conference was held on August 17th. 2012.
Bashuna A. Factors affecting effective management of the procurement function at Nakuru North Sub-County[J]. International journal of business & management, 2013, 1(7): 262-291.
Wahu K E, Namusonge G S, Mungai C, et al. Factors Affecting Performance of the Procurement Function in Kenyan Public Secondary Schools: A Case Study of Gatundu District[J]. 2017. Ning, Y.-Z. (2023). Factors Affecting the Cost Savings Rate of University Procurement. Archives of Business Research, 11(5). 21-27.
Grega M, Orviska M, Nemec J, et al. Factors determining the efficiency of Slovak public procurement[J]. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 2019, 12(1): 43-68.
Yi-Zi Ning, Promotion Role of Information Disclosure on Competitive Response of Sporadic Procurement in Universities[J]. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2023, 10(3), 57–61.
Jiménez-Castillo D, Sánchez-Fernández R. The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 49: 366-376.
Zhu B, Zhang M, Zhou Y, et al. Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 134: 110946.
Fatorachian H, Kazemi H. Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2021, 32(1): 63-81.
Lăzăroiu G, Ionescu L, Uță C, et al. Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(5): 2110.
Cohen J F W, Hecht A A, McLoughlin G M, et al. Universal school meals and associations with student participation, attendance, academic performance, diet quality, food security, and body mass index: A systematic review[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(3): 911.
AlNuaimi B K, Singh S K, Harney B. Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective[J]. Journal of business research, 2021, 134: 78-88.
Cutcher L, Ormiston J, Gardner C. ‘Double-taxing’Indigenous business: exploring the effects of political discourse on the transfer of public procurement policy[J]. Public Management Review, 2020, 22(9): 1398-1422.
Baily P, Farmer D, Jessop D. Purchasing principles and management[M]. Pearson Education, 2005.
Ning Y Z, Liu X, Cheng H M, et al. Effects of social network structures and behavioral responses on the spread of infectious diseases[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 539: 122907.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yi-Zi Ning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
