Bridging as Metaphor- A Systems Thinking Approach for Exploring Transboundary Risk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1012.13553Keywords:
transboundary risk, grand challenges, systems theory, complexity theory, scenario planningAbstract
This paper provides a novel approach for understanding transboundary risk, including ‘grand challenges’ such as climate change. Discussion begins with an exploration of the origins of transboundary risk as a byproduct of globalization. Thereafter, the concept of ‘bridging’ is used in order to conceptualize the spread of transboundary risk across traditional physical boundaries, including geographic borders. Building upon prior theory, systems thinking and complexity are used as conceptual lenses for understanding the dynamics of transboundary risk. Scenario planning is offered as a means for envisioning and addressing the challenges presented by transboundary risk. The result of this discussion is a holistic, systems view of transboundary risk which stands in contrast to traditional, reductionist perspectives of risk. As such, the paper concludes by proposing a set of epistemological questions that emerge as a result of this shift.
References
Beck, U., Risk society: Towards a new modernity. 1992, New Delhi: Sage.
Beck, U., World at risk. 2009, Polity Press: Cambridge.
Bell,D., The coming of post-industrial society- A venture in social forecasting. 1999, New York: Basic Books.
Bonabeau, E., Understanding and managing complexity risk. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2007. 48(4): p. 62-Chermack, T.J., Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures, 2004. 36: p. 295-309.
Coomber, J.R., Natural and Large Catastrophes- Changing Risk Characteristics and Challenges for the Insurance Industry. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance- Issues and Practice, 2006. 31(1): p. 88-95.
Child, J. and Rodrigues, S., How organizations engage with complexity- A political action perspective. Unpublished manuscript, 2008. Retrieved from www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egosnet/data/uploads/OS_2008/W-093.doc
Friedman, T.L., The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. First edition, 2005, New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fulmer, R.M., Nine management development challengers for the 1990s. The Journal of Management Development, 1992. 11(7): p. 4-10.
Giddens, A., The consequences of modernity. 1990, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press Giddens, A., Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 1999. 62(1): p. 1-10.
Grobstein, P., From complexity to emergence and beyond: Towards empirical non- foundationalism as a guide for inquiry. Soundings, 2007. 90(1/2): p. 301-323.
Locklear, K. (2022). Bridging as Metaphor- A Systems Thinking Approach for Exploring Transboundary Risk. Archives of Business Research, 10(12). 1-nd Katz, D. and Kahn, L.R., The social psychology of organizations. 2 edition 1978, New York: Wiley and Sons.
Keleman, M. and Bansal, P., The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 2002. 13: p. 97-108.
Lagadec, P., Over the edge of the world. Crisis Response Journal, 2007. 3(4) : p. 48-49.
Latour, B., Politics of nature. 2004, Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.
Michel-Kerjan, E.O., Toward a new risk architecture: The question of catastrophe risk calculus. Social Research, 2008. 75(3): p. 819-854.
O’Brien, F.A., Scenario planning -- Lessons for practice from teaching and learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004. 152(3): p. 709-722.
Postma, T.J. and Liebl, F., How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2005. 72: p. 161-173.
Richardson, K.A., Cilliers, P. and Lissack, M., Complexity science: A ‘gray’ science for the ‘stuff in between’. Emergence, 2001. 3(2): p. 6-18.
Schwartz, P., The art of the long view. 1991, New York: Doubleday.
Senge, P. and Sterman, J.D., Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992. 59(1): p. 137-150.
Smith, D. and Fischbacher, M., The changing nature of risk and risk management: The challenge of borders, uncertainty and resilience. Risk Management, 2009. 11: p. 1-12.
Sornette, D., Dragon-kings, black swans and the prediction of crises. Swiss Finance Institute research paper series. Swiss Finance Institute, 2009. 9(36).
Stacey, R.D., Complex responsive process in organizations. 2001, New York: Routledge.
Tacke, V., BSE as an organizational construction: A case study on the globalization of risk. British Journal of Sociology, 2001. 52(2): p. 293-312.
White, D., Application of systems thinking to risk management. Management Decision, 1995. 33(10): p. 35-45.
Wright, G. and Goodwin, P. Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: Enhancing the scenario method. International Journal of Forecasting, 2009. 25: p. 813-825.
Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Burt, G., Bradfield, R. and Cairns, G., Scenario planning interventions in organizations: An analysis of the causes of success and failure. Futures, 2008. 40(3): p. 218-236.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kathleen Locklear
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
