Drainage of Giant Liver Abscess by Robotic Surgery: Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.105.15437Keywords:
Robotic, Laparoscopic, Liver Surgery, Operative surgical procedure, Giant liver abscessAbstract
Introduction: The robot-assisted surgery system has overcome some technical bottlenecks of laparoscopy and dramatically improves the flexibility and precision of liver operation. It can also provide the magnified field of surgery and the three-dimensional view, facilitating intracorporeal sutures and visualization of delicate tissue anatomy. However, several limitations, such as the robot's high cost and high failure rate, prevent its popularization. Clinical Case: She has admitted a 54-year-old female via the emergency room due to abdominal pain and a liver cyst. He began two weeks prior to admission with intense pain located in the right hypochondrium irradiating towards the contralateral hypochondrium; he went to a private doctor who told him to perform a UDG of the abdomen in which the presence of a liver cyst, which is why go to this hospital. An abdominal tomography was performed, which reported: an ovoid, hypodense image with slightly lobed and well-defined edges, which measures 8.7 x 16.4 x 9.9 cm in its principal axes with an approximate volume of 738 mL and located in segments VI, VII, and VIII; It presents a wall with a thickness of up to 14 mm, which presents moderate and heterogeneous enhancement after the passage of the contrast medium; dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct up to 7.6 mm. Discussion: Robotic surgery is superior to conventional laparoscopic surgery in various complex surgical procedures. For example, in radical prostatectomy, the robotic approach has been associated with an earlier return of sexual function compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, attributed to a more remarkable ability to preserve the cavernous nerve. Conclusion: Drainage of a giant liver abscess has not been reported to date resolved by robotic surgery.
References
Kitisin K, Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tsung A. A current update on the evolution of robotic liver surgery. Minerva Chirurg, 2011 Aug; 66(4):281-93.
Idrees K, Bartlett DL. Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Aug; 90(4):761-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.04.020.
Zhang L, Yuan Q, Xu Y, Wang W. Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 2020; 15(10):e0240593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240593
Guan R, Chen Y, Yang K, et al. Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a metaanalysis. Asian J Surg, 2019; 42:19e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.05.008
Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, Jiao L, Hilal MA, White SA. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg, 2021; 110(3): 290-300.
Lorenz E, Arend J, Franz M, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center. Langenbeck's Arch Surg, 2021; 406:753-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02152-6 96
Downs-Canner S, Van der Vliet WJ, Thoolen SJJ, et al. Robotic Surgery for Benign Duodenal Tumors J Gastrointest Surg, 2015 February; 19(2):306-12. Doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2668-0
Sebastián-Tomás JC, Martínez-Pérez A, Martínez-López E, de'Angelis N, Gómez Ruiz M, García-Granero E. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: Is the future now? World J Gastrointest Surg, 2021 August 27; 13(8):834-47. Doi: 10.4240/wjgs. v13.i8.834
Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Robinson SR, French JJ, White Steven A. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2019; 21:1107-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Omar Felipe Gaytán-Fuentes, Alejandro Alberto Flores-Lopez, Noely Xochitl Leonor Guerrero-Ortega, Arturo Romero-Macías, Ricardo Cerón-Castillo, Edith Barajas-Galicia, Jairo Arturo Barba-Mendoza, Guillermo Padrón-Arredondo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.