Succenturiate Lobe of Placenta: The Importance of Prenatal Diagnosis: Clinical Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.96.13456Keywords:
Doppler ultrasound, placenta succenturiata, placental abnormalities, Doppler ultrasound.Abstract
Introduction. The succenturiate lobe is a morphological variation of the placenta that usually appears as a separate lobe from the main placental disc and can be single or multiple. This incidence increases when there is a history of pelvic infection, infertility, twin pregnancies, or preeclampsia. As for the product, it can present prematurity, growth disorder, and surgical resolution of pregnancy. Clinical case. Female, 30 years old, with the following obstetric history, menarche 15 years, rhythm 28X5 days, dysmenorrhea, IVSA: 15 years-old, Pregnancies 3, births one, 5 years-old, abortion one in the first trimester, cesarean section one. Emergency with detects blood pressure 154/90 mmhg, second take 166/93 mmhg. The diagnosis of pregnancy of 29.4 weeks of gestation by first-trimester ultrasound, preeclampsia is integrated. Among the surgical findings, a violaceous uterus is observed on the anterior and anterior sides, with clinical data of hematic infiltration secondary to placental abruption grade 1, Placenta with a succenturiate lobe Discussion. Placental anomalies are rare because they have a low incidence and in most cases, their diagnosis is made after delivery, however, they can cause problems in the third stage of labor such as placental retention or postpartum hemorrhage, the latter because the accessory vessels can rupture and compromise the viability of the product or during delivery, the accessory lobe can be retained causing hemorrhage and compromising the life of the mother. Conclusions: The antenatal diagnosis of placental anomalies is important because it allows these patients to be classified and considered as high-risk pregnancies.
References
Spirt BA, Kagan EH, Gordon LP, Massad LS. Antepartum diagnosis of a succenturiate lobe: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981; 9:139-40.
Ma JS, Mei X, Niu YX, Li QG, Jiang XF. Risk Factors and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of Succenturiate placenta: A case-control study. J Reprod Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 61(3-4):139-44. PMID: 27172636.
Moreno-Santillana AA, Arriaga-López A, Martínez-Adame LM. Placenta succenturiata. Reporte de un caso. Rev Fac Med. Marzo-Abril 2018; 61(2):37-41.
Cavaliere AF, Rosati P, Ciliberti P, Buongiorno S, Guariglia L, Scambia Gi, et al. Succenturiate lobe of placenta with vessel anomaly: a case report of prenatal diagnosis and literature review. Clin Imag. 2014 Sep-Oct; 38(5):747-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.01.018. 74
Nelson LH, Fishburne JI, Stearns BR. Ultrasonographic description of succenturiate placenta. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan; 49(1 Suppl):79-80.
Hata K, Hata T, Aoki S, Takamori H, Takamiya O, Kitao M. Succenturiate placenta diagnosed by ultrasound. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1988; 25(4):273-276. DOI: 10.1159/000293798.
Chihara H, Otsubo Y, Ohta Y, Araki T. Prenatal diagnosis of succenturiate lobe by ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2000 Feb; 263(3):137-138. DOI: 10.1007/s004040050013.
Suzuki S, Igarashi M. Clinical significance of pregnancies with succenturiate lobes of placenta. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr; 277(4):299-301. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0482-6. FIGURES
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alejandro Lenin Villalobos-Rodríguez, Rafael del Carmen Cárdenas-Núñez, Paula Rodríguez-Villalobos, Guillermo Padrón-Arredondo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.