Radiological Morphometry of the Proximal Femur in Kenyan Adult Patients at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1304.12071Keywords:
Anatomical variation, Femoral head diameter, Implant design, Neck-shaft angle, Proximal femur, RadiomorphometryAbstract
Background: The prevalence of proximal femur and hip ailments is increasing, requiring appropriate treatments such as osteosynthesis and arthroplasty. Preoperative planning relies on morphometric dimensions of the proximal femur, yet anatomical variations across populations mean many commercial implants may not fit optimally. Selecting the correct implant is crucial to avoid postoperative complications, hence the need for this study. Objectives: To determine the radiomorphometric measurements of the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and femoral head diameter (FHD) in Kenyan adults at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) to guide implant design and assess variations by gender, laterality, and influencing factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was done on 118 normal radiograph patients comprising of 57 (48.3%) males and 61 (51.7%) females. Student-t-test was used to compare the measurements of the proximal femur in relation to gender and laterality. Statistical significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. Continuous data was presented as mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, while categorical data as frequency and proportions. Results: Results reveal that, for factors affecting NSA and FHD, Age (p-value 0.911), Gender (p-value 0.643), Region (p-value 0.449) and Level of activity (p-value 0.498) did not have statistical significance on the findings while Diet (p-value 0.029) was statistically significant. Majority of patents were of middle age. The mean Femoral NSA and FHD diameter in Kenyan adult patients varied from those of other populations. The mean NSA and FHD varied in relation to gender (males greater) and laterality (right greater, but difference not statistically significant) in terms of measurements. Diet factor finding was statistically significant. Conclusion and Recommendations: Implants should be designed according to the new measurements in this study. Orthopaedic Surgeons should always consider morphometric dimensions before osteosynthesis in the proximal femur and arthroplasty of the hip.
References
Adekoya-Cole, T., Akinmokun, O., Soyebi, K., & Oguche, O. (2016). Femoral neck shaft angles: A radiological anthropometry study. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 23(1): 17.
Ahmad, M., Nanda, R., Bajwa, A. S., Candal-Couto, J., Green, S., & Hui, A. C. (2007). Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury, 38(3): 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058
Akbar, W. (2015). A radiographic study of neck shaft angle in population of Mardan region, Khyber Pukhtonkhwa – Pakistan. Biomedica, 31(2): 108–114.
Baharuddin, M. Y., Kadir, M. R. A., Zulkifly, A. H., Saat, A., Aziz, A. A., & Lee, M. H. (2011). Morphology Study of the Proximal Femur in Malay Population. International Journal of Morphology, 29(4): 1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022011000400042
Bogin, B., Hermanussen, M., & Scheffler, C. (2022). Bergmann’s rule is a “just-so” story of human body size. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 41(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00287-z
Branco de Sousa, E., Mota Pacheco Fernandes, R., Bezerra Mathias, M., Roberto Rodrigues, M., James Ambram, A., & Antonio Babinski SOUSA, M. DE. (2010). Morphometric Study of the Proximal Femur Extremity in Brazilians Estudio Morfométrico del Extremo Proximal del Fémur en Brasileños. In Int. J. Morphology, 28(3): 835- 840.
Cho, H. J., Kwak, D. S., & Kim, I. B. (2015). Morphometric evaluation of Korean femurs by geometric computation: Comparisons of the sex and the population. BioMed Research International, 2015;2015:730538. doi: 10.1155/2015/730538. Epub 2015 Aug 27. PMID: 26413540; PMCID: PMC4564606.
Corwin, R. L., Hartman, T. J., Maczuga, S. A., & Graubard, B. I. (2006). Dietary saturated fat intake is inversely associated with bone density in humans: Analysis of NHANES III. Journal of Nutrition, 136(1), 159–165. Scholar Publishing
Filipov, O. (2014). Epidemiology and Social Burden of the Femoral Neck Fractures. Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers), 20(4):516–518. https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2014204.516
Gilligan, I., Chandraphak, S., & Mahakkanukrauh, P. (2013). Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: Variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. Journal of Anatomy, 223(2):133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12073
Heaney, R. P., & Layman, D. K. (2008). Amount and type of protein influences bone health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87(5):1567–1570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1567s
Igbigbi, P. S., & Msamati, B. C. (2002). The footprint ratio as a predictor of pes planus: A study of indigenous Malawians. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 41(6):394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516 (02)80086-2
Jiang, N., Peng, L., Al-Qwbani, M., Xie, G. P., Yang, Q. M., Chai, Y., Zhang, Q., & Yu, B. (2015). Femoral Version, Neck-Shaft Angle, and Acetabular Anteversion in Chinese Han Population. Medicine (United States), 94(21):1–9.
Joshi, M. G., Advani, S. G., Miller, F., & Santare, M. H. (2000). Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding. Journal of Biomechanics, 33(12):1655–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00110-X
Karakas, H. M., & Harma, A. (2007). Estimating femoral nail length in bilateral comminuted fractures using fibular and femoral head referencing. Injury, 38(8): 984–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.041
Kaur P, Mathew S, & George U. (2013). A study of neck shaft angle in the North-West Indian population on radiographs. Int. j. Appl. Basic. Med., 3(3):9–15.
Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Ong, K., Zhao, K., Kelly, M., & Bozic, K. J. (2009). Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(10):2606–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6
Lakati, K. C., Ndeleva, B. M., Mouti, N. & Kibet, J. (2017). Proximal femur geometry in the adult Kenyan femur and its implications in orthopaedic surgery. East African Orthopaedic Journal EAOJ, 11(March):22–27.
Lecerf, G., Fessy, M. H., Philippot, R., Massin, P., Giraud, F., Flecher, X., Girard, J., Mertl, P., Marchetti, E., & Stindel, E. (2009). Femoral offset: Anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, 95(3): 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010
Lee, C. K., Kwan, M. K., Merican, A. M., Ng, W. M., Saw, L. B., The, K. K., Krishnan, M., & Ramiah, R. (2014). Femoral head diameter in the Malaysian population. Singapore Medical Journal, 55(8):436–438. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014103
Magu, N., Magu, S., Rohilla, R., Batra, A., Jaipuria, A., & Singh, A. (2014). Computed tomographic evaluation of the proximal femur: A predictive classification in displaced femoral neck fracture management. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 48(5):476–483.
McGrory, J., Morrey, F., Cahalan, D., & Cabanela, E. (1995). Effect Abductor of Femoral Muscle Offset Strength on of Total Motion and After. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 77(6):865–869. Scholar Publishing
Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, (2024). About us- Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital. Available at: MTRH website: http://www.mtrh.go.ke).
Nissen, N., Hauge, E. M., Abrahamsen, B., Jensen, J. E. B., Mosekilde, L., & Brixen, K. (2005). Geometry of the proximal femur in relation to age and sex: A cross-sectional study in healthy adult Danes. Acta Radiologica, 46(5):514–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850510021562
Nwoha, P. U. (1991). The collodiaphyseal angle of the femur in adult Nigerians. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 20(2):143–147. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/1908622
Otsianyi, W. K., Naipanoi, A. P., & Koech, A. (2011). The femoral collodiaphyseal angle amongst selected Kenyan ethnic groups. Journal of Morphological Sciences, 28(2):129–131.
Parvizi, J., Keisu, K. S., Hozack, W. J., Sharkey, P. F., & Rothman, R. H. (2004). Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with an Uncemented Femoral Component: A Long-Term Study of the Taperloc Stem. Journal of Arthroplasty, 19(2):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.003
Ravichandran, D., Devi Sankar, K., Sharmila Bhanu, P., Manjunath, K. Y., & Shankar, R. (2014). Angle of femoral neck anteversion in Andhra Pradesh population of India using image tool software. Journal International Medical Sciences Academy, 27(4):199–200.
Roy, S., Kundu, R., Medda, S., Gupta, A., & Nanrah, B. K. (2014). Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(9):AC01–AC03. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9269.4852
Rubin, P. J., Leyvraz, P. F., Aubaniac, J. M., Argenson, J. N., Esteve, P., & De Roguin, B. (1992). The morphology of the proximal femur: A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 74(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.74b1.1732260
Sahni, S., Mangano, K. M., Hannan, M. T., Kiel, D. P., & McLean, R. R. (2015). Higher protein intake is associated with higher lean mass and quadriceps muscle strength in adult men and women. Journal of Nutrition, 145(7):1569–1575. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.204925
Siwach, R. (2018). Anthropometric Study of Proximal Femur Geometry and Its Clinical Application. Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), 54(04):203–215. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712831
Srivastava, R., Saini, V., Rai, R. K., Pandey, S., & Tripathi, S. K. (2012). A Study of Sexual Dimorphism in the Femur Among North Indians. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01885.x
Toogood, P. A., Skalak, A., & Cooperman, D. R. (2009). Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(4):876–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0473-3
Ullmark, G. (2014). Femoral head fractures: Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty? HIP International: the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip and therapy, 2014 Oct 2:24 Suppl 10:e12-4. PMID: 25329978
Umer, M., Sepah, Y. J., Khan, A., Wazir, A., Ahmed, M., & Jawad, M. U. (2010). Morphology of the proximal femur in a Pakistani population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 18(3):279-81. PMID: 21187535
Unnanuntana, A., Toogood, P., Hart, D., Cooperman, D., & Grant, R. E. (2010). Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 28(11):1399–1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21119 Scholar Publishing
Ward, F. O. (1838). Human Anatomy. Renshaw. ALSO: Outline of human osteology, London: Henry Renshaw. Google scholar.
Weaver, T. D. (2003). The shape of the Neandertal femur is primarily the consequence of a hyperpolar body form. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(12):6926–6929. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1232340100
Zaki, M., Shona, S., Sayed, W. & Ghada, A. (2017). The Proximal Femur in Egyptian (Morphometric and Radiological Study). Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research, 7(2): 2–7.
Zernicke, R. F., Salem, G. J., Barnard, R. J., & Schramm, E. (1995). Long-term, high-fatsucrose diet alters rat femoral neck and vertebral morphology, bone mineral content, and mechanical properties. Bone, 16(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)80007-D
Zernicke, R. F., Salem, G. J., Barnard, R. J., Woodward, J. S., Meduski, J. W., & Meduski, J. D. (1995). Adaptations of immature trabecular bone to exercise and augmented dietary protein. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 27(11): 1486–1493. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/8587484
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Darwin Ambuka, Barry R. Ayumba, Antony N. Njoroge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
