BS- English FYDP Syllabus Vs. BA-english Tydp: An Evaluation at Graduate Level

BS-English FYDP Syllabus vs BA-English TYDP An Evaluation at Graduate Level

Rehana Yasmin Anjum
  1. Ankara University. (2009). School of foreign languages, Retrieved September 10, 2009, from Bell, R.(1960).Curriculum.London:
  2. The”OpenUniversity Educational Studies. Best, J.W. (1959) Research in Education, Engle Wood Cliff N. J. Prentice Hall, 1959. Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V (1992) Research in Education.
  3. “New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India. Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2003). Research in education (9th”Ed.). Boston, MA:
  4. Pearson Education Company. Brumfit, C.J. (1981) Problem and”Principles in”English Teaching. Pengumon Press . Great Britian. Byron, D. (1979) Teaching Writing Skills,
  5. England .Longman. Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Massachusetts: MIT Press”1965. Cowley, Sue. (2002)Getting the Buggers to Write. London:
  6. Continuum, 2002. Cronbach, L.J. (1991). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers’ College Record, 64, 672d683. Crystal,D.(1995.)
  7. The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language. Cambridge Univ. Press, Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ellis, R. (1993) the Structural Syllabus and the Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 27d91) French, G.F. (1963) 74 Flowerdew, J., and Peacock, M. (2001). (Eds.).
  9. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, Cambridge: CUP. Fraenkel, R. and Wallen, N. E.(1990).How to design and evaluate research”in education.
  10. New York: Mc Grawd Hill. Gay, L.R. (1985) Educational Evaluation and Measurement. Columbus: Charlse E. Merril Publishing Company. Gay, L.R. (1987)
  11. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (3rd Ed.).London: CharlseE.Merril Publishing Company. Graddol, D. (1997) Future of English .
  12. London:The English Company(UK) Ltd. Retrieved fromHttp://www.english Graddol, D. (2000).The future of English?
  13. A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st Century. London: British Council. Gowda, A. (1982) Research”in Education.New Delhi:
  14. Prentice Hall of India. Güllü, S. A.(2007). An evaluation”of”English”program at Kozan Vocational School of Çukurova University: Students’ point of view.
  15. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Adana. Hussain.S.A.H. (1986) Problems and Principles of English Language Teaching in Pakistan,Hashmi Art Press. Karachi. Haque,A.R.(1993)The”Position”and Status of English in Pakistan.
  16. In Robert Baumgardner (ed) The English Language in Pakistan (pp.13d18) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hill, J. (1986)”Teaching Literature”in the”Language Classroom.
  17. London and Basingstock: Mcmillan Publishers Ltd. Hopki,D.(1989).Evaluation for”School”Development. Islamabad: Open University Press (Milton”Keynes) Hobbs,J.(1997)Teaching Observed, Grossvenor Press. Portmouth: Great”Britain.
  18. Jawarska,E. and”Porte, G.(2007). Forty”years”of language teaching. London: Cambridge”University”Press Koutoudas, Andreas, (1996)”
  19. WritingTransformationalGrammar: AnIntroduction,NewYork: McgrawHill Book
  20. Company. Nunan, D. (1993). Taskdbased syllabus design: selecting, grading and sequencing tasks. In G. Crookes and S.M. Gass (Eds.).Tasks in a pedagogical context.
  21. Cleveland, UK: Multilingual Matters. Olivia, F. P. (2001). Developing the curriculum.
  22. New York: Longman. Payne, A. (1994). Designing educational project and program evaluations. London: Norwell. Pekiner, G. (2006).
  23. Evaluation of the science and technology curriculum at grade level 4 and 5: Pilot study. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  24. Pittman, R.S. (1985). Evaluation in the social studies curriculum: A responsive evaluation model. Unpublished doctorate’s thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  25. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983).The CIPP”model for program evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Stufflebeam, D. L., and Shinkfield, A. J.(1985).Systematic evaluation. Boston:
  26. Kluwe Nijhoff. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T.
  27. Kellaghan and D.L Stufflebeam (Eds). International handbook of educational evaluation,
  28. Part 1 (pp.31d62). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Tahir,M.S.(1990) Modern Approaches to the Teaching of English as a Second Language.Lahore.
  29. Tanner, D., and Tanner, L. N. (1980) Curriculum development: Theory into practice.
  30. New York: Macmillan. Yanık, A. (2007). A study of English language curriculum implementation” in 6th, 7th and 8th grades of public primary schools through
  31. teachers’ and students’perceptions.Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. 75 Special Thanks to Ankara” University’s Thesis Research
  32. Library (Evaluation of Preparatory School” Program Using” CIPP
BS- English FYDP Syllabus Vs. BA-english Tydp: An Evaluation at Graduate Level