The H-Index, A Bibliometric Indicator With Several Limitations: Critical Reflections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1206.19665Keywords:
h-index, Hirsch, bibliometric indicator, references, citationsAbstract
The h-index, proposed by Hirsch in 2005, is a useful bibliometric indicator for characterizing a researcher's scientific output. Since its introduction, although its widespread adoption has been rapid, thanks in part to its relatively simple calculation, several authoritative scholars have highlighted the numerous limitations of this widespread and renowned index, which measures a researcher's scientific impact by taking into account the number of publications and the number of citations those publications have received from other researchers. Therefore, in addition to taking productivity into account, the indicator also takes into account the researcher's impact within the scientific community. Based on our study, we believe there are several limitations that could seriously compromise the usefulness of this well-known bibliometric indicator. The h-index is important, yes, but not exhaustive, and in the absence of other indicators, it could prove both mathematically precise and misleading.
References
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 2005;102(46):16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Gupta H. h Index and its limitations. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024;13(6):2529-2530. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1887_23
Mondal H, Deepak KK, Gupta M, Kumar R. The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12(11):2531-2537. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1613_23
Koltun V, Hafner D. The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253397. Published 2021 Jun 28. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253397
Ding, J., Liu, C. & Kandonga, G. A. Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors. Scientometrics 122, 1303–1322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03364-1
Costas R, Bordons M. The h-index: advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J Informetrics. 2007;1(3):193-203. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
Martin BR. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics. 1996;36(3):343-362. doi:10.1007/BF02129599
Glänzel W. On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index. Science Focus. 2006;1(1):10-11.
De Cassai A, Mustaj S, Dost B, Munari M. Limitations of H-index as a measure of academic influence and the importance of innovation in research: Lessons for the anesthesiology community. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 2024; 18(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_662_23
Goyanes M, Domínguez-Díaz A, Jordá B, de-Marcos L. Gender gap in citations, h-index, and representation: Examining the highly cited authors across continents and disciplines in Google Scholar. PLoS One. 2025;20(11):e0334690. Published 2025 Nov 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334690 133
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giulio Tarro, Giovanni De Giorgio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
