Cervical Cancer: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Experience of the Mohamed VI Center for Cancer Treatment

Authors

  • G. Hatim Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • N. Tawfiq Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • H. Jouhadi Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • N. Benchakroun Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • Z. Bouchbika Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • M. Bourhafour Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • M. Belhouari Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • O. Bahri Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • M. Ait Alla
  • T. Chekrine Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca
  • S. Sahraoui Mohamed VI center for cancer treatment, Ibn Rochd UHC, Casablanca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18298

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is the second most common gynaecological cancer after breast cancer in low-middle income countries, particularly Morocco. Worldwide, cervical cancer is the 4th most frequently diagnosed cancer and the 4th leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Its pathogenesis is linked to HPV infection. Improved hygiene and living conditions, and the organization of FCV screening, could reduce the incidence and mortality of this neoplasm. HPV vaccination and screening remain the two mainstays of cervical cancer prevention. Aim of the study:  The aim of our work is to study the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and evolutionary profile of cervical cancer at the Mohamed VI Center for Cancer Treatment. Material and methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study, spread over a six-year period from December 31, 2016 to, January 1, 2010, including all patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and initially managed at the Mohamed VI Center for Cancer Treatment. Results: A total of 168 cases meeting the inclusion criteria were collected. The age group most affected was between 51 and 60. The age of onset of sexual activity was before 18 in 23.8% of cases. Multiparity was noted in 73.82% of cases. 48.8% of patients were using oral contraception. Repeated genital infections were found in 41.07% of patients, the majority of whom were inadequately treated and monitored. Genital bleeding was the main reason for consultation in 89.25% of cases. The mean tumor size was 5 cm, with extremes of 2 and 10 cm. Squamous cell carcinoma predominated with a percentage of 87.5%. Patients were classified according to F.I.G.O 2009 criteria, and stage IIB was most frequently found, with a percentage of 64.2% (108 patients). The most commonly used protocol was concomitant radio-chemotherapy (CRT) followed by brachytherapy in 51.2% of patients. Outcome was specified for 112 patients. It showed locoregional recurrence in 16 patients, lymph node metastases in 2 patients, 1 case of bone metastasis and 1 case of liver metastasis. In our study, estimates of overall survival, progression-free survival and relapse-free survival at 5 years were 71%, 63.2% and 78% respectively. Survival by F.I.G.O. stage was 86%, 78%, 56% and 9% respectively for stages I, II, III and IV. Conclusion: Cervical cancer remains a major public health problem, especially in low and middle income countries where it is a major cause of death. Major advances in diagnosis and treatment occurred in the management of cervical cancer but we still need to step up our screening efforts and extend them to the entire population in order to make impacting breakthroughs.

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

Tazi MA, Benjaafar N, Er-Raki A. Registre des cancers de Rabat. Résultats de l’année 2005. Ministère de la Santé du Maroc. 2009. Disponible sur: http://www.fmpusmba.ac.ma/pdf/Documents/cancer_registry_mor_rabat.pdf [consulté le 6 juin 2014].

Coibion C. Cancer du col utérin dans les pays industrialisés et ailleurs: quel bilan d’extension selon les moyens? Imagerie Femme. 2016;26:86–94.

Singh D, et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(2):e197–e206. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0.

Dursun P, Gultekin M, Ayhan A. The History of Radical Hysterectomy. J Lower Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(3):235–45. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e31820eb0.

Querleu D, Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR. 2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(11):3406–12. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-6031-z.

Guimarães YM, Godoy LR, Longatto-Filho A, Reis RD. Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Literature Review. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(3):575. doi:10.3390/cancers14030575.

Landoni F, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350(9077):535–40. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02250-2.

Kaneyasu Y, Fujiwara H, Nishimura T, et al. A multi-institutional survey of the quality of life after treatment for uterine cervical cancer: a comparison between radical radiotherapy and surgery in Japan. J Radiat Res. 2021;62(2):269–84. doi:10.1093/jrr/rraa107.

Resbeut MR, Alzieu C, Gonzague-Casabianca L, Badinand D, Bardou VJ, Cravello L, et al. Combined brachytherapy and surgery for early carcinoma of the uterine cervix: analysis of extent of surgery on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50(4):873–81.

Haie-Meder C, Chargari C, Rey A, Dumas I, Morice P, Magne N. DVH parameters and outcome for patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with preoperative MRI-based low dose rate brachytherapy followed by surgery. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93(2):316–21 51

Lamblin G, Rouffiac M, Mathevet P, Martin E, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Chabert P, et al. Chirurgie exclusive ou curiethérapie utérovaginale préopératoire pour cancer du col utérin de stade IB1 : profil des toxicités. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015;43(7-8):485–90.

Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Fischerova D, et al. Surgical treatment of “intermediate risk” lymph node negative cervical cancer patients without adjuvant radiotherapy—A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(3):438–43.

Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.

Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, et al. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(Suppl 4):72–83.

Escande A, Khettab M, Bockel S, et al. Interaction between the Number of Chemotherapy Cycles and Brachytherapy Dose/Volume Parameters in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1653. doi:10.3390/jcm9061653.

Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized Comparison of Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin Versus Hydroxyurea as an Adjunct to Radiation Therapy in Stage IIB-IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix With Negative Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes: A Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1339.

Claire V, et al. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5802–12.

Zhou Y, Rassy E, Coutte A, et al. Current Standards in the Management of Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Update on the Benefit of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Strategies. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(10):2449. doi:10.3390/cancers14102449.

Chargari C, Deutsch E, Blanchard P, et al. Brachytherapy: An overview for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):386–401. doi:10.3322/caac.21575.

Charra-Brunaud C, Harter V, Delannes M, et al. Impact of 3D image-based PDR brachytherapy on outcome of patients treated for cervix carcinoma in France: Results of the French STIC prospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103(3):305–13. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.03.005.

Chekrine T, et al. Patterns of practice survey for cervical cancer brachytherapy in Morocco. Brachytherapy. 2024;S1538-4721(24)00008-4. doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.01.004.

Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1548–55. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985.

Kenter G, Greggi S, Vergote I, et al. Results from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemoradiation for stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer, EORTC 55994. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(Suppl 15):5503.

McCormack M, Gallardo Rincón D, Eminowicz G, et al. LBA8 A randomised phase III trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: The GCIG INTERLACE trial. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:S1276.

Ma X, Fang J, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023;184:103953. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103953. 52 (2025). Cervical Cancer: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Experience of the Mohamed VI Center for Cancer Treatment. British

Mileshkin LR, Moore KN, Barnes EH, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer versus chemoradiotherapy alone (OUTBACK): An international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(4):468–82.

Monk BJ, Toita T, Wu X, et al. Durvalumab versus placebo with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (CALLA): A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(10):1334–48.

Lorusso D, Xiang Y, Hasegawa K, et al. LBA38 Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase III ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:1279–80.

Garcia-Duran C, et al. ATOMICC trial: a randomized, open-label, phase II trial of anti-PD1, dostarlimab, as maintenance therapy for patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(6):828–35.

Servayge J, Olthof EP, Mom CH, et al. Survival of Women with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer: Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy and Hyperthermia versus Chemoradiotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(3):635. doi:10.3390/cancers16030635.

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, et al. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature. 2017;543(7645):378–84. doi:10.1038/nature21386.

Musunuru HB, Pifer PM, Mohindra P, et al. Advances in management of locally advanced cervical cancer. Indian J Med Res. 2021;154(2):248–61.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Hatim, G., Tawfiq, N., Jouhadi, H., Benchakroun, N., Bouchbika, Z., Bourhafour, M., … Sahraoui, S. (2025). Cervical Cancer: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Experience of the Mohamed VI Center for Cancer Treatment. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 12(02), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18298