Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform to Raw Magnetic Resonance Signals to Differentiate Tissue Features

Authors

  • C. A. Martínez-Hernandez Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, TECNM/Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • J. M. Rodríguez-Lelis Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, TECNM/Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • Oscar Domínguez Pérez Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, TECNM/Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • J. A. Rodríguez-Ramírez Centro de Investigación en Ingenieía y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • Irving Lecona Licona Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, TECNM/Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • P. O. Joaquin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18387

Keywords:

Raw, resonance magnetic signal, mechanical properties, passband filter, tissue

Abstract

It is quite useful to diagnose different health conditions such as cancer, osteolysis, amongst others, by the use of images for clinical practice or research. The study and to interpret, anatomical areas of interest has always been a core subject of imaging systems. Technological development in this area has produce had focuses on enhance temporal and spatial resolutions. Although a lot of research has been done to improve images characteristics, the final diagnostic relies on the judgment and experience of the medical specialist since there is not a numerical relationship to the mechanical properties of the human tissues.  Based on the former, this work is aimed to develop a procedure to identify the characteristics of tissue and relate them to mechanical properties as an aid to medical diagnosis. Here, the continuous wavelet transform is applied as a passband filter tool to raw magnetic resonance signals. A relation between frequency content and tissues present in the image was identified. From here,it was found that tissue regions exhibiting higher stiffness and toughness emit signals with low frequency, while tissues with lower stiffness and toughness emit signals with high frequency. The method proposed allows to extract information that can help to generate parameters for classification, detection and mechanical properties of human tissue, for the tissue disease diagnosis.

References

Paul C Lauterbur et al. Image formation by induced local inter- actions: Examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature, 242(5394):190–191, 1973.

G Harding, J Kosanetzky, and U Neitzel. X-ray diffraction computed tomography. Medical physics, 14(4):515–

Keh-Yang Lee, Jeffrey N Masi, Christian A Sell, Robert Schier, Thomas M Link, Lynne S Steinbach, et al. Computer-aided quantifica- tion of focal cartilage lesions using mri: accuracy and initial arthroscopic comparison. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 13(8):728–737, 2005.

Thorsten M Buzug. Computed tomography: from photon statistics to modern cone-beam CT. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

Robert Lewis Holmes. Living tissues: an introduction to functional histology. Elsevier, 2013.

Francis A Duck. Physical properties of tissues: a comprehensive reference book. Academic press, 2013.

Jeffry S Nyman, Qingwen Ni, Daniel P Nicolella, and Xiaodu Wang. Measurements of mobile and bound water by nuclear magnetic reso- nance correlate with mechanical properties of bone. Bone, 42(1):193–199, 2008.

R Adam Horch, Daniel F Gochberg, Jeffry S Nyman, and Mark D Does. Non-invasive predictors of human cortical bone mechanical properties: T2-discriminated 1h nmr compared with high resolution x-ray. PloS one, 6(1), 2011

K Epperson, AM Sawyer, M Lustig, M Alley, M Uecker, P Virtue, et al. Creation of fully sampled mr data repository for compressed sensing of the knee. In SMRT Conf., Salt Lake City, UT, 2013.

Curtis P Langlotz, Bibb Allen, Bradley J Erickson, Jayashree Kalpathy- Cramer, Keith Bigelow, Tessa S Cook, et al. A roadmap for foundational research on artificial intelligence in medical imaging: From the 2018 nih/rsna/acr/the academy workshop. Radiology, page 190613, 2019.

Dag Stranneby. Digital signal processing and applications. Elsevier, 2004.

John Sadowsky. Investigation of signal characteristics using the contin- uous wavelet transform. johns hopkins apl technical digest, 17(3):258– 269, 1996.

Lei Nie, Shouguo Wu, Xiangqin Lin, Longzhen Zheng, and Lei Rui. Ap- proximate derivative calculated by using continuous wavelet transform. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 42(2):274–283, 2002.

Paul S Addison, James Walker, and Rodrigo C Guido. Time–frequency analysis of biosignals. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine, 28(5):14–29, 2009.

Hannu Olkkonen. Discrete Wavelet Transforms: Biomedical Applica- tions. BoD–Books on Demand, 2011.Paul S Addison. The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: intro- ductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance. CRC press, 2017.

Yoon Young Kim and Eung-Hun Kim. Effectiveness of the continuous wavelet transform in the analysis of some dispersive elastic waves. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1):86–94, 2001.

Qiao SUN and Ying Tang. Singularity analysis using continuous wavelet transform for bearing fault diagnosis. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 16(6):1025–1041, 2002.

J Kilby and H Gholam Hosseini. Extracting effective features of semg using continuous wavelet transform. In 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 1704–1707. IEEE, 2006.

Alexander J Casson, David C Yates, Shyam Patel, and Esther Rodriguez- Villegas. An analogue bandpass filter realisation of the continuous wavelet transform. In 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 1850–1854. IEEE, 2007.

Alberto Del Guerra. Ionizing radiation detectors for medical imaging. World Scientific, 2004 25

Vadim Kuperman. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and applications. Academic Press, 2000.

Donald W McRobbie, Elizabeth A Moore, and Martin J Graves. MRI from Picture to Proton. Cambridge university press, 2017.

Souheil J Inati, Joseph D Naegele, Nicholas R Zwart, Vinai Roopchans- ingh, Martin J Lizak, David C Hansen, et al. Ismrm raw data format: a proposed standard for mri raw datasets. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 77(1):411–421, 2017.

Peter Fratzl. Collagen: structure and mechanics, an introduction. Collagen: structure and mechanics, pages 1–13, 2008.

R Adam Horch, John C Gore, and Mark D Does. Origins of the ultrashort-t2 1h nmr signals in myelinated nerve: a direct measure of myelin content? Magnetic resonance in medicine, 66(1):24–31, 2011.

W Nitz. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. In Clinical MR Imaging, pages 1–52. Springer, 2006.

Steven W Smith et al. The scientist and engineer’s guide to digital signal processing. 1997.

Alexander Grossmann and Jean Morlet. Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 15(4):723–736, 1984.

The HDF Group. Hierarchical Data Format, version 5, 1997-NNNN. https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Martínez-Hernandez, C. A., Rodríguez-Lelis, J. M., Pérez, O. D., Rodríguez-Ramírez, J. A., Licona, I. L., & Joaquin, P. O. (2025). Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform to Raw Magnetic Resonance Signals to Differentiate Tissue Features. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 12(02), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18387