Accreditation for Higher Institutions in the Underdeveloped and Developing Countries: A Call for Action

Authors

  • Riad Mohammed Abdelrahman School of Medical & Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Libyan International Medical University, Benghazi, Libya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-2739
  • Taha Hussein Musa School of Medical & Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Libyan International Medical University, Benghazi, Libya; School of Medicine, Darfur University College, Nyala, Sudan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-1943

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18665

Abstract

In this letter to the editor, the authors call for action to establish robust accreditation processes for higher education institutions in underdeveloped and developing countries. They note that accreditation is a key step in ensuring that institutions meet global standards and is reported to enhance the quality of healthcare and social care. The letter observes that private and public higher education has grown considerably in these countries, while the globalization of professions increases pressure on institutions to deliver internationally recognized qualifications. It identifies several problems: most of these countries are far from embracing accreditation as a process for quality assurance and improvement; governments that finance and manage most institutions also run the accreditation bodies, which is seen as a conflict of interest; and in many countries accreditation bodies are absent, non-functional or lack a useful online presence, while multiple agencies (Sudan) or a divergent mission (Syria) create confusion. Without proper accreditation, students may obtain degrees that lack global recognition, which harms their career prospects, particularly in fields such as healthcare, where the quality of education is directly tied to public well-being. The authors argue that limited resources, political instability and lack of funds should not be a reason for delay, and they urge governments, educational organizations and international stakeholders to work together on effective and continuous accreditation processes.

Abstract prepared by the editorial office from the full text of the article; the authors did not supply one.

References

W. Nicklin, C. Engel, and J. Stewart, “Accreditation in 2030.,” Int. J. Qual. Heal. care J. Int. Soc. Qual. Heal. Care,

UNESCO, Accreditation and the global higher education market. 5005.

D. Sims et al., “Medical education, reflections and perspectives from South Africa: a review,” BMC Med. Educ.,

D. Ahn, “Current trend of accreditation within medical education,” J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof., vol. 17, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3352/JEEHP.2020.17.30.

“MOHE.” Accessed: Mar. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mohe.gov.sd/

“Sudan Medical Council.” Accessed: Apr. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.smcsdn.com/

“Ministry of Higher Education and scientific research.” Accessed: Apr. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.mohe.gov.sy/mohe/

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Abdelrahman, R. M., & Musa, T. H. (2025). Accreditation for Higher Institutions in the Underdeveloped and Developing Countries: A Call for Action. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 12(02), 422–424. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1202.18665

Most read articles by the same author(s)