Efficacy, Safety, and Ergonomics of the EMS Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Review

Authors

  • Muhammad Ishfaq Specialty Doctor, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom
  • MS Floyd Consultant, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom
  • Praveen Gopi Specialty Doctor, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-0347
  • A Samsudin Consultant, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom
  • Kaylie Hughes Consultant, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom
  • John McCabe Consultant, Department of Urology, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Liverpool, L35 5DR, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.116.17817

Keywords:

Kidney stone, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy, EMS Swiss Lithoclast Trilogy®

Abstract

Purpose: The Swiss Lithoclast Trilogy® is a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technology used for kidney stone fragmentation. It has a trifecta effect, including mechanical fragmentation, ultrasound lithotripsy, and suction to remove stone fragments. Some comparative studies have reported a higher stone-free rate, increased safety and lower operative time, yet robust evidence remains inconclusive. We reviewed studies investigating clinical safety, efficacy, and ergonomics of PCNL for treating renal stones. Methods: We reviewed 11 studies investigating Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy for PCNL from 2017 until September 2024. eywords were used to search PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science databases for relevant studies. After applying eligibility criteria and excluding animal and laboratory studies, 11 studies were included in this systematic review. Data was extracted for efficacy, safety, and ergonomics and analyzed to synthesize the results. Results: Out of 11, 2 were retrospective cohorts and 09 were prospective studies. The Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy exhibited higher efficacy in stone fragmentation and clearance than traditional techniques. For mini PCNL, the stone fragmentation rate was reported up to 15.75 ± 20.81 mm3/sec. For supine PCNL, the stone fragmentation rate was 20.33 +/- 27.83mm3/sec. Lastly, Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy was associated with high ergonomic satisfaction, and no significant complications. Conclusions: EMS Swiss Lithoclast Trilogy® for PCNL exhibits efficacy and safety with variable ergonomics. However, limited data are available and further prospective and randomized trials comparing EMS Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy with equivalent technologies for PCNL are warranted to determine its role relating to the stone type and procedure.

References

Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. /3 2010 REVIEWS IN UROLOGY DISEASE STATE REVIEW. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2):86-96. doi:10.3909/riu0459

Patel SR, Nakada SY. The modern history and evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):153-157. doi:10.1089/END.2014.0287

Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257-259. doi:10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084

Lowe G, Knudsen BE. Ultrasonic, Pneumatic and Combination Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. https://home.liebertpub.com/end. 2009;23(10):1663-1668.

Li Y, Zeng F, Yang Z, Chen H. [Comparison of Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor and Swiss lithoclast master in ultrasonically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013;38(8):853-856. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7347.2013.08.016

Scotland KB, Kroczak T, Pace KT, Chew BH. Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1347-1351. doi:10.1007/S00345-017-2057-X/METRICS

SinghAbhishek, JairathAnkush, ChhabraJaspreet, et al. Laser with Suction as an Energy Source in Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Experience. https://home.liebertpub.com/vid. 2016;30(5). doi:10.1089/VID.2016.0007

Shah D, Patil A, Reddy N, et al. A clinical experience of thulium fibre laser in miniperc to dust with suction: a new horizon. World J Urol. 2021;39(7):2727-2732. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03458-8 TM

Patil A, Sharma R, Shah D, et al. A prospective comparative study of mini-PCNL using Trilogy or thulium fibre laser with suction. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):539-543. doi:10.1007/S00345-021-03881-5/METRICS

Cho CO, Yu JH, Sung LH, Chung JY, Noh CH. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using pneumatic lithotripsy (Lithoclast®) alone or in combination with ultrasonic lithotripsy. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(11):783-787. doi:10.4111/KJU.2010.51.11.783

Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips C, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy Recommended Citation. J Endourol. 2008; 22:285-289. doi:10.1089/end.2007.0009

Radfar MH, Basiri A, Nouralizadeh A, et al. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasonic Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(1):82-88. doi: 10.1016/J.EUF.2017.02.003

Gu Z, Qi J, Shen H, Liu J, Chen J. Percutaneous nephroscopic with holmium laser and ultrasound lithotripsy for complicated renal calculi. Lasers in Medical Science 2010 25:4. 2010;25(4):577-580. doi:10.1007/S10103-010-0769-X 12

Hong Y, Lin H, Yang Q, et al. Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Guy’s Stone Score Grade IV Kidney Stone. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):45-51. doi:10.1159/000509043

Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Chinenov D, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game? Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(2):229-234. doi:10.5173/ceju.2021.0133

Sabnis RB, Balaji SS, Sonawane PL, et al. EMS Lithoclast TrilogyTM: an effective single-probe dual-energy lithotripter for mini and standard PCNL. World Journal of Urology 2019 38:4. 2019;38(4):1043-1050.

Bader MJ, Eisel M, Strittmatter F, et al. Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices. World Journal of Urology 2020 39:2. 2020;39(2):563-569.

O’Connor CJ, Hogan D, Yap LC, Lyons L, Hennessey DB. An ex-vivo assessment of a new single probe triple modality (Trilogy) lithotripter. World J Urol. 2022;40(10):2561-2566. doi:10.1007/S00345-022-04127-8/FIGURES/3

Nottingham CU, Large T, Cobb K, et al. Initial Clinical Experience with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. https://home.liebertpub.com/end. 2020;34(2):151-155.

Thakare N, Tanase F, Saeb-Parsy K, et al. Efficacy and safety of the EMS Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for PCNL: results of the European multicentre prospective study on behalf of European Section of UroTechnology. World J Urol. 2021;39(11):4247-4253. doi:10.1007/S00345-021-03710-9/TABLES/2

Carlos EC, Wollin DA, Winship BB, et al. In Vitro Comparison of a Novel Single Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripter to Current Devices. https://home.liebertpub.com/end. 2018;32(6):534-540.

Mendeley Reference Manager | Mendeley. Accessed February 20, 2024. https://www.mendeley.com/reference-management/reference-manager

Gao M, Zhu Z, Liu M, Chen J, Chen H, Zeng F. Enhanced recovery after surgery in EMS lithotripsy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study. Published online 2022. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1804553/v1

Timm B, Farag M, Davis NF, et al. Stone clearance times with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of a 1.5 mm ballistic/ultrasonic mini-probe vs. laser. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2020;15(1): E17-21. doi:10.5489/cuaj.6513

Large T, Nottingham C, Brinkman E, et al. Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Novel Intracorporeal Lithotripters: ShockPulse-SE vs Trilogy Trial. J Endourol. 2021;35(9):1326-1332.

Cauni VM, Tanase F, Mihai B, et al. Single-Center Experience with Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for Kidney Stones. Diagnostics. 2023;13(8). doi:10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS13081372

Chen J, Zhou X, Chen Z, et al. Multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy assisted by LithoClast master in one session for staghorn calculi: report of 117 cases. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(2):165-169.

Bozkurt O, Sen V, Irer B, et al. Nation-wide analysis of the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on daily urology practice in Turkey. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(4): e13735. doi:10.1111/IJCP.13735 13

Lee C, Masani A, Whitehurst L, Watson G, Mackie S. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the primary definitive management of ureteric stones. J Clin Urol. Published online April 23, 2022. doi: 10.1177/20514158221090044/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_20514158221090044-FIG4.JPEG

Bikram Thapa B, Niranjan V. Mini PCNL Over Standard PCNL: What Makes it Better? Published online 2020. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1701225

De Stefano V, Castellani D, Somani BK, et al. Suction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, Development, and Outcomes from Experimental and Clinical studies. Results from a Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus. Published online July 11, 2023. doi: 10.1016/J.EUF.2023.06.010

Mohammadinejad P, Ferrero A, Bartlett DJ, et al. Automated radiomic analysis of CT images to predict likelihood of spontaneous passage of symptomatic renal stones. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28(4):781-788. doi:10.1007/S10140-021-01915-4/FIGURES/5

Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery. 2019; 66:62-71. doi: 10.1016/J.IJSU.2019.04.016

Lattarulo M, Tsaturyan A, Adamou C, et al. Comparative Evaluation between One Ultrasonic and Two Single-Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripters: In Vitro and in Vivo Experiment in a Porcine Model. J Endourol. 2021;35(8):1229-1235. doi:10.1089/end.2020.1143

Sharifiaghdas F KA. Evaluating percutaneous nephrolithotomy-induced kidney damage by measuring urinary concentrations of β2-microglobulin - PubMed. Accessed February 29, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22090045/

Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, Kurien A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Prospective comparative study of Miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):896-900. doi:10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010. 09936.X

Manzo B, Lozada E, Alarcon P, et al. MP26-18 HOLMIUM VERSUS TRILOGY IN KIDNEY STONES GUY´ S 1-2 (TRIHOLMIUM) PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS. Journal of Urology. 2023;209(Supplement 4). doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003254.18

Ramon Berguer. The Application of Ergonomics to the General Surgeons’ Working Environment. Rev Environ Health. 1997;12(2):99-106. doi:10.1515/REVEH.1997.12.2.99

Ejaz M, Saulat S, Qadri SSU, Ayub A. Comparison of Outcomes of Pneumatic Ballistic Lithotripsy, Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, and Combined Electromagnetic with Ultrasonic Lithotripsy during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Oct. 20];73(6):1725-8.

Kindler, R., Venkat, A., Arias-Villela, N. L., Meeks, W., Galen, E., Abbott, J. E. ., Dunne, M. M., Davalos, J. G., & Rosen, D. C. (2024). Introduction of 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter in miniature percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Description of technique and case outcomes. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8714

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Ishfaq, M., Floyd, M., Gopi, P., Samsudin, A., Hughes, K., & McCabe, J. (2024). Efficacy, Safety, and Ergonomics of the EMS Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Review. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 11(06), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.116.17817