A Comparative Study of Topiramate and Botulinum Toxin in Reducing Migraine Disability in Patients with Chronic Migraine

Authors

  • Erick-Eduardo Solís-Tun Department of Internal Medicine, Clínica Hospital Mérida, ISSSTE, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Yucátan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatan, México
  • Steven-Andrés Piña-Ballantyne General Medicine, Universidad Anáhuac Mayab, Mérida, Mexico
  • Jorge Arceo-Novelo Neurology Department, Clínica-Hospital Mérida, Mérida, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.116.17999

Keywords:

Chronic migraine, topiramate, botulinum toxin, treatment-resistant, incobotulinum toxin A

Abstract

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly debilitating neurological condition that requires effective treatment. Topiramate and botulinum toxin are widely used for management and prevention. However, comparative data on treatment escalation in patients with treatment-resistant CM and incobotulinum toxin A (inco-BTX-A, Xeomin®) remain limited. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is a valuable tool for objectively quantifying the impact of migraines on daily functioning. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of topiramate and inco-BTX-A in terms of their effectiveness in reducing disability associated with treatment-resistant CMs. Methods: This comparative, observational study evaluated the effectiveness of topiramate and botulinum toxin in reducing MIDAS scores in patients with CM who had previously failed initial treatments. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (topiramate to inco-BTX-A), group 2 (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/NSADIs to topiramate), and group 3 (NSAIDs to inco-BTX-A). Data collection included demographic features and MIDAS scores before and after treatment. Results: A total of 96 patients were included, with a predominance of female patients (85.41%). Group 1(n=39) showed a significant reduction in MIDAS scores 4.1 ± 2.88, t-statistic = 8.89 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between Group 2 (n=39) and Group 3 (n=18), with a p-value of 0.0545. Conclusions: Topiramate and inco-BTX-A effectively reduced MIDAS scores in patients with CM, particularly in those with treatment resistance. While groups 2 and 3 showed similar outcomes, inco-BTX-A demonstrated a more significant effect in group 1, suggesting its potential as an effective treatment for treatment-resistant CM.

References

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202

Lipton RB, Munjal S, Alam A, et al. Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) Study: Baseline Study Methods, Treatment Patterns, and Gender Differences. Headache. 2018 Oct;58(9):1408-1426. doi: 10.1111/head.13407

Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: Epidemiology, Burden, and Comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019 Nov;37(4):631-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.06.001

Mistry H, Naghdi S, Brown A, et al. Preventive drug treatments for adults with chronic migraine: a systematic review with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(63):1-329. doi: 10.3310/AYWA5297

Pearl NZ, Babin CP, Catalano NT, et al. Narrative Review of Topiramate: Clinical Uses and Pharmacological Considerations. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep;40(9):3626-3638. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02586-y

Baraldi C, Lo Castro F, Ornello R, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA: Still the Present for Chronic Migraine. Toxins (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;15(1):59. doi: 10.3390/toxins15010059

Ion I, Renard D, Le Floch A, et al. Monocentric Prospective Study into the Sustained Effect of Incobotulinumtoxin A (XEOMIN®) Botulinum Toxin in Chronic Refractory Migraine. Toxins. 2018; 10(6):221. doi: 10.3390/toxins10060221

Jost WH, Blümel J, Grafe S. Botulinum neurotoxin type A free of complexing proteins (XEOMIN®) in focal dystonia. Drugs. 2007;67(5):669–683. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00003

Frevert J. Xeomin® is free from complexing proteins. Toxicon. 2009;54(5):697–701. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.03.010

Dressler D, Mander GJ, Flink K. Equivalent potency of Xeomin® and Botox®. Mov Disord. 2008;23(Suppl 1):S20–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.04.029

Frevert J, Dressler D. Complexing proteins in botulinum toxin type A drugs: a help or a hindrance? Biologics. 2010;4:325–332. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S14902 250

Park J, Lee MS, Harrison A. Profile of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) for the treatment of blepharospasm. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:725-732. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S13978

Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S20-8. doi:10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20

Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, et al. Insights into the functional anatomy behind the PREEMPT injection paradigm: guidance on achieving optimal outcomes. Headache. 2017 May;57(5):766-777. doi: 10.1111/head.13074

Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010, 50:921-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x

Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the 56-week PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2011 Sep;51(9):1358-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01990.x

Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: A systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(5):599-609. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01941.x

Kępczyńska K, Domitrz I. Botulinum Toxin-A Current Place in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine and Other Primary Headaches. Toxins (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;14(9):619. doi: 10.3390/toxins14090619

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Solís-Tun, E.-E., Piña-Ballantyne, S.-A., & Arceo-Novelo, J. (2024). A Comparative Study of Topiramate and Botulinum Toxin in Reducing Migraine Disability in Patients with Chronic Migraine. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 11(06), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.116.17999