Agent Orange and Vietnam Veterans: A Review

Authors

  • Alvin Lee Young A.L. Young Consulting, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming.
  • Lynda V. Alexander

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.113.16910

Abstract

Issue: Approximately 3 million Allied personnel from the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea served in the Republic of Vietnam from March 1965 through March 1973 in what became known as the Vietnam-American War. In March 1978, a widely distributed documentary “Agent Orange: Vietnams Deadly Fog”, generated fear and anger in Vietnam veterans of that War who became aware that the tactical herbicide Agent Orange, a defoliant, had been deployed in combat operations to improve visibility in enemy controlled jungle and infiltration routes, and around base perimeters. One of the herbicidal components of Agent Orange (2,4,5-T herbicide) contained the contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a highly toxic chemical associated with industrial accidents and an alleged teratogen in forestry programs where the herbicide was widely sprayed for brush control and conifer release. Following the release of the documentary, thousands of Allied Vietnam Veterans overwhelmed Veterans Administrations claiming Agent Orange and the associated dioxin were responsible for numerous diseases, birth defects, and long-term health issues.  Despite the passage of almost 50 years, science has not been able to answer the question of the health impacts of alleged environmental exposures to either the TCDD or the tactical herbicides on Vietnam veterans. Thus, at the heart of the issues the question remains, were Vietnam veterans ever exposed to Agent Orange and TCDD or was it the Vietnam experience that has impacted the long-term health of the Vietnam veteran? Background: From March 1965 through April 1971, the United States Air Force and the US Army Chemical Corps sprayed approximately 74.2 million liters of tactical herbicides on 1.7 million hectares of the inland forests, savannas, and grasslands of South Vietnam. Contained within the 74.2 million L was 43.3 million L of the tactical herbicide known as Agent Orange that was contaminated with 130 kg of TCDD. Numerous research studies have been conducted in Vietnam, all alleging that the TCDD from Agent Orange was responsible for health issues among the Vietnamese.  However, a careful assessment of the sources of TCDD in Vietnam indicated that significant quantities of TCDD were in the waterways and atmosphere due to the pollution from industries and open burning of municipal and industrial wastes, and not from Agent Orange. Human Studies: The deployment of in-country medical support in the War by the Allied Forces was instrumental in saving lives. What was unexpected was that more casualties died from insect-transmitted diseases and other health related issues than from enemy bullets and bombs. The more than 50 health studies of Vietnam veterans by the four Allied nations confirmed that with two exceptions (the Air Force Health Study of veterans from Operation RANCH HAND, and health studies of US Army Chemical Corps personnel) Vietnam veterans were never exposed to Agent Orange or TCDD. What the health studies did confirm was that the “Vietnam Experience” impacted the long-term health of the men and women who served in that war.  Policy Considerations: The Congress of the United States, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Vietnam veteran simply refuse to accept the reality that little or no exposure to the herbicides or TCDD ever occurred in Vietnam. Instead, the Government continues to expand the lists of diseases and locations through the Agent Orange Act of 1991, and the PACT Act of August 2022. We concur that all Vietnam veterans deserve the best possible health care US and Allied nations can provide, and the recognition they are entitled to for having served in Vietnam. Perhaps the governments would have been fairer with a program of “Vietnam Experience” benefits rather than Agent Orange benefits.

References

Office of Research & Development, VA Research on Vietnam Veterans. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC, Accessed 2020.

Young AL, Alexander LV. History and Assessment of the War Environment on the Subsequent Health of the Vietnam Veteran. Med Res Arch 2023; 11 (3):1-24.

Young AL. The Military Use of Tactical Herbicides. IN: Young AL. The History, Use, Disposition and Environmental Fate of Agent Orange. Chapter 3:57-119, Springer Science +Business Media, LLC, New York, NY, 2022.

Young AL, Young KL. Agent Orange Use in Vietnam and Alleged Health Impacts: A Review. Med Res Arch 2017; 5(10): 1-20.

Fox RP. Air Base Defense in the Republic of Vietnam, 1961-1973. Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force, Washington DC, 1979. 278p.

Young AL, Project RANCH HAND: The Men and the Mission. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 2:9-33. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58. Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Buckingham WA, Jr. OPERATION RANCH HAND: The Air Force and Herbicides in Southeast Asia 1961-1971. Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force, Washington DC, 1982. 253p.

Cecil, PF. HERBICIDAL WARFARE: The RANCH HAND Project in Vietnam. Praeger Special Studies, Praeger Scientific, New York, 1986, 288p.

Westing AH. Anti-plant Chemicals. IN: Westing AH. Ecological Consequences of the Second Indochina War. Chapter 3: 24-45, Stockholm Peace Research Institute. Almquist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden, 1976.

Cecil PF, Sr., Young AL. Operation FLYSWATTER: A War Within A War. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2008; 15(1): 3-7. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.113.16910. 15

Boyne WJ. RANCH HAND. Air Force Mag 2000; 83(8):8p.

Young AL. Update on History and Science of the Major Components of Agent Orange. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 3:35-46. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Young AL. Update on Picloram and Agent White. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 4:47-60. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Young AL. Update on Cacodylic Acid, the Major Component of Agent Blue. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 5:61-81. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Olson KR, Cihacek L. Agent Blue Spraying in the Mekong Delta during the Vietnam War: Fate of Arsenic Based Herbicide Weapon Used to Destroy Rice Crops and Mangrove Forests. Open Journal of Soil Science 2022; 12L: 253-294.

HHS News. Press Release - Announcement of the first meeting of the expanded Agent Orange Working Group, August 24, 1981. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1981.

Young AL, Cecil PF, Sr. Agent Orange Exposure and Attributed Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans. Mil Med 2011: 176; 29-34.

IOM. Veterans and Agent Orange: Health Effects of Herbicides Used in Vietnam. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 1994, (including updates through 2018).

EPA. Exposure and Human Health Assessment of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, and Related Compounds. EPA’s Reanalysis of Key Issues Related to Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments, National Center for Environmental Assessment. Cincinnati, Ohio, 2012.

ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 1998.

Young AL. The Environmental Fate of the TCDD Associated with Agent Orange. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 7:93-108. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Young AL, Van Houten WJ, Andrews WB. 2nd Agent Orange and Dioxin Remediation Workshop, Hanoi, Viet Nam, 18-20 June 2007. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2008; 15:113-118.

Young AL, Giesy JP, Jones PD, Newton M. Environmental Fate, and Bioavailability of Agent Orange and Its Associated Dioxin During the Vietnam War. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2004: 11(6): 359-370.

Arthur MF, Frea JI. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: Aspects of Its important Properties and Its Potential Biodegradation in Soils. J Environ Qual 1989; 18:1-11.

Crosby DG, Moilanen KW Wong A.S. Environmental Generation and Degradation of Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans. Environ Health Perspect 1973; (5): 259-256.

Brodsky ES, et al. The Current Level of Dioxin Pollution in the Area of Large-Scale Spraying of Agent Orange. Doklady Biol Sci 2009; 429:526-530.

Schecter A, et al. Recent Dioxin Contamination from Agent Orange in residents of a Southern Vietnam City.

Mai TT. Letters to the Editor. RE: Food as a Source of Dioxin Exposure in the Residents of Bien Hoa City, Vietnam. JOEM 2004; 46 (5):415-416.

Bui, HN et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Paper Mill Wastewater: A Case Study in Viet Nam. Water Sci Technol, 2022; 85 (5):1522-1537.

Baughman RW, Meselson MS. An Analytical Method for Detection of TCDD (Dioxin): Levels of TCDD in Samples from Vietnam. EHP 1973; 5: 117-135.

Baughman RW. Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the Environment. High Resolution Mass Spectrometry at the Picogram Level. PhD Thesis in Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Xerox Microfilm #75-22-930, December 1974.

Piazza P, et al. PCDD/Fs in Sediments of Central Vietnam Coastal Lagoons: in Search of TCDD. Mar Pollut Bull 2010; 60 (12): 2303-2310.

Young AL. A Review of Public Health in Vietnam: 50 Years after Agent Orange was sprayed. Health Educ Public Health 2019; 2 (2):170-180.

EPA. Exposure and human health assessment of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. National Academy of Sciences Review Draft. EPA/600/P-00/001Cb, 2003. Available online.

UNEP. State of the Environment in Vietnam. United Nations Environment Programme Report 2003. Available online.

Pham BQ, Nguyen VS, Dang DN. Environmental Pollution in Vietnam: Analytical Estimation and Environmental Priorities. Trends Anal Chem 1995; 14:383-388.

Rappe C, et al. Sources and Relative Importance of PCDD and PCDF Emissions. Waste Manage Res 1987; 225-

Muto H, Takizawa Y. Dioxins in Cigarette Smoke. Arch Environ Health 1989; 44 (3): 171-174.

Kobayashi S et al. A role for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the dioxin TCDD in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2008; 47 (9): 1317-1322.

Schecter A, et al. Food as a Source of Dioxin Exposure in the Residents of Bien Hoa City, Vietnam. JOEM 2003; 45(8): 781-788.

Banout J, et al. Agent Orange Footprint Still Visible in Rural Areas of Central Vietnam. J Environ Public Health 2014;1-10.

Nishijo M. et al. Dioxin Congener Patterns in Breast Milk Samples from Areas Sprayed with Herbicide during the Vietnam War 40 Years after the War Ended. Toxics 2022; 10: 323-341.

Young AL, Newton M. Long Overlooked Historical Information on Agent Orange and TCDD Following Massive Applications of 2,4,5-T-Containing Herbicides, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2004; 11(4): 209-221.

Young AL. Health Studies of Allied Vietnam Veterans. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 9:127-169. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Neal S. Vietnam Studies: Medical Support of US Army in Vietnam, 1965-1970. Department of the Army, Washington DC, 1991. 212p. 17

Herman JK: Navy Medicine in Vietnam: Passage to Freedom to the Fall of Saigon. Naval History & Heritage Command, Washington Navy Yard, Washington DC, 2010. 60p.

Camp NM. US Army Psychiatry in the Vietnam War: New Challenges in Extended Counterinsurgency Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, US Army Medical Department Center & School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 2015. 558p.

Young AL. Failure of Science and Common Sense. IN: Young AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 13:239-259; Section 13.2 Exposure Assessment for Agent Orange in Vietnam. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Stellman JM, et al. A Geographic Information System for Characterizing Exposure to Agent Orange and Other Herbicides in Vietnam. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111 (3): 321-328.

Young AL, Cecil, PF Sr, Guilmartin JF Jr. Assessing Possible Exposures of Ground Troops to Agent Orange During the Vietnam War: The Use of Contemporary Military Records. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2004; 11(6): 349-358.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Serum 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Levels in US Army Vietnam-Era Veterans. JAMA 1988; 260(9): 1249-1254.

Kang HK, et al. Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Adipose Tissue of US Vietnam Veterans and Controls. Am J Public Health 1991; 81(3): 344-349.

Kim JS, et al. A Study on the Correlation Between Categorization of Individual Exposure Levels to Agent Orange and Serum Dioxin Levels Among Korean Vietnam Veterans. Korean J Prev Med 2001; 34(1): 80-88.

Catlin Boehmer TK, et al. Post Service Mortality in Vietnam Veterans: a 30-Year Follow-up. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1908-1916.

CDC. The Association of Selected Cancers with Service in the US Military in Vietnam. I. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2473-2483.

CDC. The Association of Selected Cancers with Service in the US Military in Vietnam. II. Soft Tissue and Other Sarcomas. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2485-2492.

CDC. The Association of Selected Cancers with Service in the US Military in Vietnam. III. Hodgkin’s Disease (HD), Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Cancers, and Primary Liver Cancers. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2495-

CDC. Health Status of Vietnam Veterans. Volume I. Vietnam Experience Study. Center for Disease Control and Prevention/Public Health Service/US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1989.

Young AL, Flicker MR, Kang HK, Shepard BM. Health Surveillance of Vietnam Veterans Claiming Agent Orange Exposure. IN: Keith LH, Rappe C, Choudhary G (eds). Chlorinated Dioxins & Dibenzofurans in the Total Environment. Volume II, Chapter 14 Butterworth Publishers, London, pp167-179.

Chamie K, et al. Agent Orange Exposure, Vietnam Veterans, and the Risk of Prostate Cancer. Am Cancer Soc 2008; 113(6): 1-7.

Buffler PA, Ginevan ME, Mandel JS, Watkins DK. The Air Force Health Study: An Epidemiologic Retrospective. Ann Epidemiol 2011; 21: 673-689.

Wilson E, Horsley K, van der Hoek R. Cancer Incidence in Australian Vietnam Veterans. Organohalogen Compds 2004; 66: 3677-3682. 18

McBride D, Cox B. Broughton J, Tong D. The Mortality and Cancer Experience of New Zealand Vietnam War Veterans: a Cohort Study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003397.

Yi S-W. Cancer Incidence in Korean Vietnam Veterans During 1992-2003: The Korean Veterans Study. J Prev Med Public Health 2013; 46(6): 309-318.

Young AL. Health Studies of Vietnamese Veterans and Civilians. IN: Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 10:171-194. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

NIEHS. United States-Vietnamese Scientific Conference on Human Health and Environmental Effects of Agent Orange/Dioxin. Held in Hanoi, Vietnam, 3-6 March 2002. National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 2002.

IOM. Reproductive Health Effects and Effects on Descendants. IN: Veterans and Agent Orange: Update No. 11, Chapter 8: 365-432. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2018.

Young AL. The Media and Agent Orange. IN: Young, AL. Agent Orange: The Failure of Science, Policy, and Common Sense. Chapter 12: 223-237. Studies in History and Philosophy, Vol 58, Springer Nature, Switzerland. 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

Young, A. L., & Alexander, L. V. (2024). Agent Orange and Vietnam Veterans: A Review. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 11(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.113.16910