Assessment and Impact of Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning of Anatomy Among Clinical and Anatomy Students in Two Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.112.16776Keywords:
Anatomy education, technology-based, self-directed learning, NigeriaAbstract
Global lockdown occasioned by COVID-19 pandemic showed that students in Nigeria ought to have continued learning at home if digital technologies were adequately deployed. Impact of technology-based self-directed learning of anatomy on academic performance was evaluated in a 10-month longitudinal cross-sectional study among 268 volunteer preclinical and anatomy students of two universities in South East Nigeria. Validated electronic questionnaire was used to extract information on students’ demographics, knowledge, perceptions and use of technology-based self-directed learning of anatomy, as well as their average performance in most recent anatomy examinations. Anatomy and preclinical students’ ratio was 41.8:58.2 but females and age-group of 21-25 years contributed 63.1 and 52.2% of the participants, respectively. About 69.4% of the students used smart phones, 46.3% downloaded one or no anatomy software while 49.6% experienced 5-9 hours daily phone-screen-time. Significant association was found between knowledge of technology-based self-directed learning and performance in anatomy courses (χ²=8.239; p=0.044). Respective 5.2%, 28.7%, 61.2%, and 4.9% of the students never, rarely, sometimes, and often used technology-based self-directed learning of anatomy. Students with good knowledge of technology-based self-directed learning (Adjusted OR = 1.049, p=0.007) are 1.05 times more likely to progress from lower to higher performance level when use and perception of technology-based self-directed learning are constant. Faculties should develop anatomy software, as well as provide computerized classrooms and laboratories for enhanced technology-based self-directed learning of anatomy.
References
Wilson AB, Brown KM, Mish J, Miller CH, Klein BA, Taylor MA, Goodwin M, Boyle EK, Hoppe C, Lazarus MD. Breaking with Tradition: A Scoping Meta-Analysis Analyzing the Effects of Student-Centered Learning and Computer-Aided Instruction on Student Performance in Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2019;
Geng S, Law KMY, Niu B. Investigating Self-Directed Learning and Technology Readiness in Blending Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019; 16(17): 1-22.
Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. A Review of Anatomy Education During and After the COVID-19 pandemic: Revising Traditional and Modern Methods to Achieve Future Innovation. Clinical Anatomy. 2020;
Guimaraes B, Dourado L, Tsisar S, Diniz JM, Madeira MD, Ferreira MA. Rethinking Anatomy: How to Overcome Challenges of Medical Education’s Evolution. Acta Medica Portuguesa. 2017; 30(2): 134-140.
Guimaraes B, Firmino-Machado J, Tsisar S, Viana B, Pinto-Sousa M, Vieira-Marques P, Cruz-Correia R, Ferreira MA. The Role of Anatomy Computer-Assisted Learning on Spatial Abilities of Medical Students. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2019; 12(2), 138-153.
Nieder G, Nagy F. Analysis of Medical Students’ Use of Web-Based Resources for a Gross Anatomy and Embryology Course. Clinical Anatomy. 2002; 15(6): 409–418.
Benjamin HK, Royer DF. @AACAnatomy Twitter Account Goes Live: A Sustainable Social Media Model for Professional Societies. Clinical Anatomy. 2018; 31(4): 566-575.
Marsland MJ, Lazarus MD. Ask an Anatomist: Identifying Global Trends, Topics and Themes of Academic Anatomists Using Twitter. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2018; 11(3): 270-281.
Pickering JD, Bickerdike SR. Medical Student Use of Facebook to Support Preparation for Anatomy Assessments. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2016; 10(3): 205–214.
Raikos A, Waidyasekara P. How Useful is YouTube in Learning Heart Anatomy? Anatomical Sciences Education. 2014; 7(1): 12–18.
Hennessy CM, Kirkpatrick E, Smith CF, Border S. (2016). Social Media and Anatomy Education: Using Twitter to Enhance the Student Learning Experience in Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016; 9(6): 505–515.
Kucuk S, Kapakin S, Goktas Y. Learning Anatomy via Mobile Augmented Reality: Effects on Achievement and Cognitive Load. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016; 9(5): 411–421.
Balogun GW. Using Electronic Tools and Resources to Meet the Challenges of Anatomy Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2019; 12(1): 97-104.
Raney MA. Dose- and Time-Dependent Benefits of iPad Technology in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2015; 9(4): 367–377.
Khalil MK, Abdel Meguid EM, Elkhider IA. Teaching of Anatomical Sciences: A Blended Learning Approach. Clinical Anatomy. 2018; 31(3): 323-329.
Koohestani HR, Arabshahi SK, Fata L, Ahmadi F. The Educational Effects of Mobile Learning on Students of Medical Sciences: A Systematic Review in Experimental Studies. Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism. 2018; 6(2): 58-69.
Attardi SM, Barbeau ML, Rogers KA. Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018; 11(6): 592-604.
Langfield T, Colthorpe K, Ainscough L. Online Instructional Anatomy Videos: Student Usage, Self-Efficacy, and Performance in Upper Limb Regional Anatomy Assessment. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018;
Greene SJ. The Use and Effectiveness of Interactive Progressive Drawing in Anatomy Education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018; 11(5), 445-460.
Pickering JD, Swinnerton BJ. (2019). Exploring the Dimensions of Medical Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Learning Resources and Assessing the Impact on Assessment Outcomes. 2019; Anatomical Sciences Education. 12(2): 117-128.
Zureick AH, Burk-Rafel J, Purkiss JA, Hortsch M. The Interrupted Learner: How Distractions during Live and Video Lectures Influence Learning Outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018; 11(4): 366-376.
Choi-Lundberg DL, Cuellar WA, Williams AM. Online Dissection Audio-Visual Resources for Human Anatomy: Undergraduate Medical Students’ Usage and Learning Outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016; 9(6): 545–554.
Ruzycki SM, Desy JR, Lachman N, Wolanskyj-Spinner AP. (2019). Medical Education for Millennials: How Anatomists Are Doing It Right. Clinical Anatomy. 2019; 32(1): 20-25.
Nagandla K, Sulaiha S, Nalliah S. Online Formative Assessments: Exploring their Educational Value. Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism. 2018; 6(2): 51-57.
Rao JN, Scott AJ. A Simple Method for the Analysis of Clustered Binary Data. Biometrics. 1992; 48(2): 577-585.
Artino AR, Jeffrey SL, Kent JD, Hunter G. Developing Questionnaires for Educational Research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher. 2014; 36(6): 463-474.
Bonate PL. Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs (1st ed.). London, UK: Chapman & Hall. 2000.
Lazarus I, Sookragh R, Satyapal KS. Tablet Technology in Medical Education in South Africa: A Mixed Method Study. British Medical Journal Open. 2017; 7(7): 1-10.
Zargaran A, Turk MA, Bhaskar J, Spiers HVM, Zargaran D. The Role of Technology in Anatomy Teaching: Striking the Right Balance. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2020; 11(1): 259-266.
Mustafa AG, Taha NR, Alshboul OA, Alsalem M, Malki MI. Using YouTube to Learn Anatomy: Perspective of Jordanian Medical Students. BioMed Research Internation. 2020; 5: 1-8.
Mars M, McLean M. Students’ Perceptions of a Multimedia Computer-Aided Instruction Resource in Histology. South African Medical Journal. 1996; 86(9): 1098–1102.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W. and Davis, T. J. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Instruction on Students’ Learning Outcomes in K-12 and Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Computers and Education. 2014; 70(1), 29-40.
Clunie L, Morris NP, Joynes VCT, Pickering JD. (2018). How Comprehensive Are Research Studies Investigating the Efficacy of Technology-Enhanced Learning Resources in Anatomy Education? A Systematic Review. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018; 11(3): 303-319.
Alhassan A, Majeed S. Perception of Ghanaian Medical Students of Cadaveric Dissection in a Problem-Based Learning Curriculum. Anatomy Research International. 2018; 8: 1-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ikpeze, Somadina Chiagozie, Ama, Ifeanyichukwu Maxwell, Anosike, Ifeanyi Uzochukwu, Nwovu, Friday Christian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
