Advanced Intermittent Auscultation (AIA)’ of Fetal Heart Rate in Labour – Launch of a Scientific, Reliable and Forward-Looking Training Module for Birth-Attendants, Combining Simplicity with Sound Bayesian Foundation and Modern Technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.111.16393

Keywords:

Intermittent auscultation, Electronic fetal monitoring, Fetal heart rate decelerations, Intrapartum fetal monitoring, Intrapartum fetal surveillance, late decelerations, early decelerations

Abstract

Intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring has very wide clinical application of vital importance. However, there are several different methods of Intermittent auscultation (IA) which continue to suffer from some shortcomings and even inaccuracies resulting in birth asphyxia. Clinical studies alone have not provided the epistemic perfection for IA or cardiotocography (CTG). However, integrating them with the understanding of fetal pathophysiology, practical experience and critical thinking during adverse event investigations provides functional knowledge required for reliable and efficient IA. The “Advanced Intermittent Auscultation (AIA)” regime and training module published in 2022, pragmatically uses the current knowledge-base retaining simplicity of IA while maximising the benefits of widely available affordable modern but simple technology, thus improving efficiency, reliability and accuracy of IA. In addition, AIA opens the possibility judging the FHR baseline variability in future, unfeasible with previous regimes. Many current IA regimes, by mistakenly insisting on actually counting the fetal heart tones, have failed to make progress and remain unsafe, and hence best abandoned. This article describes in detail the foundational concepts of “Advanced Intermittent Auscultation (AIA)”. It demonstrates the superiority of handheld Doppler monitors which should be preferentially used. Importantly, ‘auscultation’ should not mandate ‘actual counting’ by single or multiple-count methods, which is laborious and less accurate. The FHR displayed on the Doppler device has the same accuracy as that on the CTG. Simply observing this display (and modest attention to the tempo of heart sounds) constitutes the most reliable technique of inferring FHR periodic variations. The FHR display should be observed from the latter part of contraction to the beginning of the next contraction (or eventually a full contraction-relaxation cycle). AIA maintains the benefits of the simplicity of IA by avoiding unwarranted, impractical and unproven addition of parameters like FHR cycling or post-deceleration overshoots. The AIA regime is comprehensive, pragmatic, practical, non-laborious (facilitating more holistic care), more accurate / reliable and thus enhances patient safety. Hence, AIA should be adopted worldwide including by the national professional bodies in UK, Europe, Americas and Australasia.

References

Dyer C (2020) Nottingham trust must urgently improve “unsafe” maternity services, says CQC. BMJ 371: m4726. [Crossref]

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2019) National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Intrapartum care - Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Guideline No 190., London (UK): 2014, updated in 2019. [Cited 15 APRIL 2022]. Available from URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190

Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) (2007) Fetal health surveillance: Antepartum and intrapartum guideline. Clinical Practice Guideline No 197. [cited 10th April 2015]. Available from URL: http://sogc.org/guidelines/fetalhealth- surveillance-antepartum-and-intrapartumconsensus-guideline/

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist (2014) Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance Clinical Guideline – Third Edition; 2014. [cited 10th April 2022]. Available from URL: http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/college-statementsguidelines. Html

American College of Nurse-Midwives (2015) Intermittent auscultation for intrapartum fetal heart rate surveillance. J Midwifery Womens Health 60: 626-632. [Crossref]

Lewis D, Downe S, FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel (2015) FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Intermittent auscultation. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131: 9-12. [Crossref]

Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML, Cuthbert A (2017) Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006066. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3

Blix E, Maude R, Hals E, Kisa S, Karlsen E, et al. (2019) Intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring during labour: A systematic scoping review to identify methods, effects, and accuracy. PLoS ONE 14: e0219573. [Crossref]

Martis R, Emilia O, Nurdiati DS, Brown J (2017) Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD008680. [Crossref]

Al Wattar BH, Honess E, Bunnewell S, Welton NJ, Quenby S, et al. (2021) Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. CMAJ 193: E468-E477. [Crossref]

Bookstein FL (2014) What, Then, IS to Be Done? In: Bookstein FL, ed. Measuring and Reasoning –Numerical inferences in sciences. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 493-500.

Spiegelhalter D (2019) Answering questions and claiming discoveries. Learning from experience the Bayesian way. In: Spiegelhalter D. ed. The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data. 1st ed. Milton Keynes, UK: Penguin Random House UK. Pp. 253-339.

Bergstrom CT, West JD (2020) The susceptibility of science. In: Bergstrom CT, West JD.eds. Calling Bullshit- The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World. 1st ed. London, UK: Allen Lane, Penguin Random House UK. pp. 206-241.

Harford T (2020) How to make the World Add Up. Ten Rules for thinking differently about Numbers. The Bridge Street Press, London, UK. pp.226-251.

Pinker S (2021) Beliefs and evidence (Bayesian reasoning). In: Pinker S. ed. Rationality. 1st ed. Penguin Random House UK. pp. 149-171.

"Advanced Intermittent Auscultation (AIA)” of Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) in Labour: AIA Regime and Training Module. ResearchGate, 2022. DOI: 10.13140/ RG.2.2.31563.87841 211

MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers I (1985) The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152: 524-539. [Crossref]

Rosenberg K (2021) Intermittent auscultation reduces risk of emergency cesarean delivery. Am J Nurs 121: 59. [Crossref]

Smith V, Begley C, Newell J, Higgins S, Murphy DJ, et al. (2019) Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission - a multicentre randomized trial: the ADCAR trial. BJOG 126: 114-121. [Crossref]

Hersh S, Megregian M, Emeis C (2014) Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making. J Midwifery Womens Health 59: 344-349. [Crossref]

Kamala BA, Wangwe PJ, Dalen I, Mduma E, Perlman JM, et al. (2018) Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring using a handheld Doppler versus Pinard stethoscope: a randomized controlled study in Dar es Salaam. Int J Womens Health 10: 341-348. [Crossref]

Mdoe PF, Ersdal HL, Mduma ER, Perlman JM, Moshiro R, et al. (2018) Intermittent fetal heart rate monitoring using a fetoscope or hand-held Doppler in rural Tanzania: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18: 134.

Byaruhanga R, Bassani DG, Jagau A, Muwanguzi P, Montgomery AL, et al. (2015) Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 5: e006867. [Crossref]

Mahomed K, Nyoni R, Mulambo T, Kasule J, Jacobus E (1994) Randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. BMJ 308: 497-500. [Crossref]

Sholapurkar SL (2020) Intermittent auscultation (surveillance) of fetal heart rate in labor: a progressive evidence-backed approach with aim to improve methodology, reliability and safety. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 35: 2942-2948. [Crossref]

Harding C, Johnson D (2017) Intelligent intermittent auscultation. eFM. E-Learning for Healthcare. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London. [Cited 5 FEBRUARY 2022] Available from URL: https://portal.elfh.org.uk/LearningContent/ Launch/515455.

Intelligent Intermittent Auscultation: Improving safety for low-risk mothers and babies in labour by improving the knowledge, skills and confidence of midwives (2020) Oxford AHSN. Replay of webinar held on 9th October 2020. [Cited 1 MARCH 2022]. Available from URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZ7AR40IDM

Porter P, Muirhead F, Brisbane J, Schneider B, Choveaux J, et al. (2021) Accuracy, clinical utility, and usability of a wireless self-guided fetal heart rate monitor. Obstet Gynecol 137: 673-681. [Crossref]

Sholapurkar SL (2022) High-level human and animal experimental evidence validates the importance of classifying fetal heart rate decelerations into early (non-Hypoxemic) and late (Hypoxemic) types. Ann Obstet Gynecol 5: 1035.

Sholapurkar SL (2022) Birth attendants should ponder the broad consilient evidence of paramount importance and their own experience confirming that fetal head compression in labor causes benign decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 227: 119-121. [Crossref]

Sholapurkar SL (2019) Myths at the core of intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation- Risks of false ideology, Prospect theory and way forward. Clinical Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med 5: 1-9.

Marenus M (2020) Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. [Cited 5 MARCH 2022] Available from URL: https://www.simplypsychology.org/multiple-intelligences.html

Occam’s razor. Wikipedia. [Cited 24 APRIL 2022] Available from URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor.

Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, Akande V, Winter C, et al. (2006) Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG 113: 177-182. [Crossref]

Lowe V, Archer A. Intermittent (Intelligent) Auscultation in the Low-Risk Setting (2017) In: Chandraharan E. ed. Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 55-58.

Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA (2012) Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207: 206.e1-8.

Hamilton E, Warrick P, O'Keeffe D (2012) Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25: 648-453. [Crossref]

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2022) Fetal monitoring in labour NICE guideline. 14 December 2022, London (UK). [Cited 15 JANUARY 2022]. Available from URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng229

Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein C (2021) A Noisy System. In: Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein C. eds. Noise – A Flaw in Human judgement. 1st ed. London, UK, Harper Collins Publishers, London. pp. 23-33.

Each Baby Counts (EBC) final report says no reduction in brain damaged babies, stillbirths or early neonatal deaths. 22 March 2021. [Cited 5 June 2022] Available from URL: https://www.cerebralpalsylawyers.co.uk/site/news/each-baby-counts-finalreport-no-reduction-birth-injury

Sholapurkar SL, Capper T (2022) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369023874_Clinical_Practice_Advanced_Intermittent_Auscultation_AIA_of_fetal_heart_rate_in_labor_-Launch_of_a_scientific_and_forward-_looking_regime_and_training_module_for_birth-attendants_combining_simplicity_

Downloads

Published

2024-02-10

How to Cite

Sholapurkar, S. L., & Capper, T. (2024). Advanced Intermittent Auscultation (AIA)’ of Fetal Heart Rate in Labour – Launch of a Scientific, Reliable and Forward-Looking Training Module for Birth-Attendants, Combining Simplicity with Sound Bayesian Foundation and Modern Technology. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 11(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.111.16393