Acute Appendicitis Plus in Uterus Foreign Body: Clinical Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.101.13587Keywords:
Intrauterine device, migration, appendicitisAbstract
Introduction. Uterine perforation by an intrauterine device (IUD) is classified into primary and secondary, the first case occurs within the first month of its insertion and the second after this period. This migration may be due to spontaneous uterine contractions, bladder contractions, increased intestinal peristalsis, and movement of peritoneal fluid. Clinical case. A 28-year-old patient came to the emergency department with abdominal pain that had lasted 8 hours until admission, accompanied by anorexia and nausea. Physical examination, a painful abdomen in the right iliac fossa with a positive Mc Burney sign. Vital signs with a low-grade fever of 37oC, BP 80/50, rest normal. Laboratories: leukocytosis 14.1/103 uL, neutrophilia 89%, rest normal, pregnancy test negative. The patient admitted to the operating room, and an open appendectomy was performed, finding a perforated appendix at the appendicular base with a retroileocecal abscess, classifying it as grade IV appendicitis. It was incident; the finding of an IUD emerging from the uterus a segment of the copper T that involves the right Fallopian tube and the rest into the utero is reported. Discussion. Reversible and long-acting contraceptives are safe and effective in their application, they involve the risk of immediate, mediate, and late uterine perforation, so their incidence is 1-2 cases per 1000 insertions; in the first setting it may be due to inexperience of the doctor who applies it by applying excessive force at the time of application, and it will surely give alarm symptoms immediately depending on the site of the perforation. Conclusions. How can be seen in this report, appendicular surgeries led to the location of this translocate IUD that had perforated the uterus and was halfway to being completely expelled. This finding is rare, and two pathologies were successfully resolved in the same surgical time.
References
Mejía, López J, Sepúlveda N, Zavaleta T, Mazzaro M. Dispositivos intrauterinos penetrados y migrados: hallazgos en tomografía computarizada. Rev Colomb Radiol, 2011; 22(3):3263-71. 97 British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research (BJHMR)
Kaleem A, Zaman B, Hassan A, Nasir M. Transmigration an intrauterine device in to sigmoid colon. Surgical management. A case report. J Pakistan Med Assoc, 2018; 68(11):1716-18.
Abonia CH, Gómez MC, Mosquera JE, Torregroza MA, García D, Usubillaga F. Translocación de dispositivo intrauterino de cobre a vejiga y litiasis vesical secundaria. Reporte de caso clínico. Urol Colomb. 2020; 29:58-62.
Aghaways I, Angwer S, Ghareeb RH, Sabir F, Hussein F. Migration of an intrauterine device to the left inguinal region. The first reported case. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016; 28:68-70.
Hassan S, Ahmad A. Migrated intrauterine device presented as anterior abdominal wall abscess. J Surg Case Rep, 2019; 6:174.
Poveda-Ortiz OM, Pedraza M, Cabrera LF, Báez DK. Apendicitis aguda por migración de dispositivo intrauterino con obstrucción del apéndice cecal. Reporte de casos y revisión de la literatura. Ann Mediterr Surg. 2020; 3(2):3-7 doi 10.22307/2603.8706.2020.02.002.
Pérez-Alcázar KV, Pérez-López JC, Martínez-Hernández CM, Ibarra-Rovirosa EA, Aguilar-Chablé FL. Perforación uterina por dispositivo intrauterino (DIU). Tratamiento laparoscópico: reporte de caso clínico. Ginecol Obstet Méx. 2022; 90(7):616-22.
Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130:1173-5 doi: 10.1097/AOG02400
González MJJ, Cázares RTK, Nájera RIA, De La Cerda AJC. Perforación asintomática por DIU. Acta Med GA. 2022; 20(1): 88-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.35366/103564.
Weerasekera A, Wijesinghe P, Nugaduwa N. Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 8:81.
Bernuy PS, Rivera NMC, Salazar LC, Ramirez FC. Dispositivo intrauterino parcialmente migrado e incrustado en serosa del rectosigmoides tras 8 años de inserción. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2015; 80(5); 412-15.
Liu G, Li F, Huang G. Intrauterine device migrated into the bladder: two case reports and literature review. BMC Women´s Health. 2021; 21.301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01443-w.
Morland D, Mathelin C, Wattiez A, Namer IJ. Bone single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography disclosing chronic uterine perforation with intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of bladder: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2013; 7:154.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alejandro Lenin Villalobos Rodríguez, Guillermo Padrón Arredondo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.