Cardiogenic Shock Nursing Approach to Improve Patient’s Outcomes: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.95.12811Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock is undeniably a disorder that causes threats to life, and prompt resuscitation with revascularization of the coronary artery is the key to survival for patients with cardiogenic shock. Cardiogenic shock affects all organs of the body; therefore, this condition is best managed by the multidisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals, including the nursing professionals. Aim: This scoping review aims to analyze the approaches utilized by nurses to improve the clinical conditions of the patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock. Methodology: This scoping review was carried out by synthesizing the evidence from previously published studies. 10 studies were used to analyze the approaches utilized by nurses to improve the clinical conditions of the patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock. Results: Nurses have an essential role in providing holistic, comphensive care for patient with diagnosed with cardiogenic shock. Intergral nursing intervention has strongly improvement of patient outcome will be directed to restoration of organ perfusion, detecting clinical deterioration and provide psychological care to the patient. Conclusion: Maintaining mean arterial pressure is essential for end-organ perfusion. The key of nursing intervention are focus around provide oxygen therapy, appropriate fluids and therapy administration .Close patient monitoring and continous assessment play piovital role with cardiogenc shock patients because it provide evidence of effectiveness of treatment, detect and prevent deterioration of patient condition.
References
Al-Ganmi, A. H. A. (2014). Assessment of Nurses' Knowledge Concerning Cardiogenic Shock for Patients' in Cardiac Care Unit at Baghdad Hospitals. kufa Journal for Nursing sciences, 4(2), 215-222.
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
Asber, S. R., Shanahan, K. P., Lussier, L., Didomenico, D., Davis, M., Eaton, J., Esposito, M., & Kapur, N. K. (2020). Nursing Management of Patients Requiring Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. Critical care nurse, 40(1), e1-e11.
Dittman, B. K. (2019). Percutaneous biventricular mechanical heart support in cardiogenic shock: a nursing case report. Critical care nurse, 39(2), 15-28.
El Sibai, R., Bachir, R., & El Sayed, M. (2018). Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use: A Matched Cohort Study in Hospitals across the United States. BioMed research international, 2018.
Hajjar, L. A., & Teboul, J.-L. (2019). Mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock: state of the art. In Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2019 (pp. 167-182). Springer.
Hamed, H. M., Mohamed, M., Abd Elhamied, T., & Ahmed, N. A. (2020). Effect of Implementing Standardized Nursing Care on Outcomes of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock. Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal, 8(20.0), 33-43.
Kalmanovich, E., Audurier, Y., Akodad, M., Mourad, M., Battistella, P., Agullo, A., Gaudard, P., Colson, P., Rouviere, P., & Albat, B. (2018). Management of advanced heart failure: a review. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 16(11), 775-794.
Kosaraju, A., Pendela, V. S., & Hai, O. (2019). Cardiogenic shock. StatPearls [Internet].
Maeda, K., Takanashi, S., & Saiki, Y. (2018). Perioperative use of the intra-aortic balloon pump: where do we stand in 2018? Current opinion in cardiology, 33(6), 613-621.
Mohamed, A. B., Abd-Alziz, M. A., Ahmed, A. A. A., & Ahmed, N. A. (2020). Assessment of Nurses’ Knowledge and Practices Regarding Care For Patients with Cardiogenic Shock. Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal, 8(20.0), 55-63.
Mylotte, D., Morice, M.-C., Eltchaninoff, H., Garot, J., Louvard, Y., Lefèvre, T., & Garot, P. (2013). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 6(2), 115-125.
Nakagawa, S., Garan, A. R., Takeda, K., Takayama, H., Topkara, V. K., Yuzefpolskaya, M., Yuill, L., Lin, S. X., Colombo, P. C., & Naka, Y. (2019). Palliative care consultation in cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of palliative medicine, 22(4), 432-436.
O'Donovan, K. (2019). Management of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 2. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, 14(2), 80-85.
Rab, T., Ratanapo, S., Kern, K. B., Basir, M. B., McDaniel, M., Meraj, P., King, S. B., & O’Neill, W. (2018). Cardiac shock care centers: JACC review topic of the week. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(16), 1972-1980.
Rathod, K. S., Koganti, S., Iqbal, M. B., Jain, A. K., Kalra, S. S., Astroulakis, Z., Lim, P., Rakhit, R., Dalby, M. C., & Lockie, T. (2018). Contemporary trends in cardiogenic shock: Incidence, intra-aortic balloon pump utilisation and outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 7(1), 16-27.
Taib AL-Hayali, J. M., & AL-samady, A. A. A. (2018). Assessment of nurses knowledge and practices concerning cardiogenic shock. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 6(2), 98-110.
Warise, L. (2015). Understanding Cardiogenic Shock: A Nursing Approach to Improve Outcomes. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 34(2), 67-78.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Salha Hamad Alrefaei, Aisha Bishi Hassan, Fatimah Fayaa Assiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
