Ovarian Dysgerminoma in a Young Patient: Balancing Oncologic Safety and Fertility Preservation

Authors

  • Sena-Martins, S. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Picinini, S. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Nakata, T. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Nunes, I. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Nunes, B. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Cardeal, L. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Rizzi, L. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Felicio, R. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Sena, A. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Paiva, R. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Cunha, A. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Ribeiro, B. Maternity Hospital Amador Aguiar, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1305.12452

Keywords:

ovarian, DYSGERMINOMA, surgical oncology, gynecological

Abstract

Malignant ovarian tumors are traditionally classified into epithelial tumors, germ cell tumors, and sex cord-stromal tumors, with germ cell tumors accounting for approximately one -third of ovarian neoplasms (Berek & Hacker, 2015; Prat, 2014; Kurman et al., 2020). Germ cell tumors include dysgerminoma, yolk sac tumor, immature teratoma, and other less common histologic subtypes (Low et al., 2012; Talerman, 2007). Dysgerminomas represent nearly one -third of malignant germ cell tumors and predominantly affect young women under 30 years of age (Zaloudek & Norris, 1979; Mangili et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2020). Although rare — comprising 1–5% of all ovarian cancers —, they account for up to 30–40% of malignant germ cell neoplasms (Gershenson, 2007; Young, 2018). Their occurrence during reproductive years explains the occasional association with pregnancy, with incidence estimates ranging from 2.8 to 11 cases per 100,000 pregnancies (ACOG, 2016; ESUR, 2010). Clinically, dysgerminomas may present with pelvic pain, an abdominal mass, menstrual irregularities, or symptoms related to the compression of adjacent organs, although some patients remain asymptomatic until the tumor reaches a considerable size (Thomassin-Naggara et al., 2013; Ulbright, 2005). No consistent hereditary associations have been identified (McCluggage, 2006; WHO Editorial Board, 2020). Imaging plays a central role in initial evaluation, with transvaginal ultrasonography and Doppler as first-line modalities, typically revealing solid, multilobulated masses with heterogeneous echotexture and low-resistance vascular flow (ESUR, 2010; Thomassin-Naggara et al., 2013; Brown et al., 2014). MRI may further characterize tissue and disease extent, but a definitive diagnosis relies on histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and surgical staging (Ulbright, 2005; McCluggage, 2006; Kurman et al., 2014). Serum tumor markers such as LDH, AFP, and \beta-hCG assist in diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection (Gershenson, 2007; Park et al., 2017; Colombo et al., 2019). LDH elevation is particularly associated with dysgerminomas, while AFP and \beta-hCG elevations suggest mixed germ cell components (Kurman et al., 2014; Mangili et al., 2011). Additional markers such as inhibin and CA 125 may support differential diagnosis (Berek & Hacker, 2021; NCCN, 2023). For patients with high-risk features — bilateral tumors, capsular rupture, peritoneal metastases, or lymph node involvement — more extensive surgery may be required, including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (Brown et al., 2014; Mangili et al., 2011; De la Motte Rouge et al., 2008). Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of adjuvant treatment and is associated with excellent survival outcomes even in advanced disease (Williams et al., 1984; Ray-Coquard et al., 2018; Williams et al., 2017). Dysgerminomas exhibit marked chemosensitivity, contributing to five-year survival rates exceeding 90% in early-stage disease (Chan et al., 2008; Droz et al., 2013; Zalewski et al., 2018). Fertility-sparing surgery has demonstrated oncologic safety, with 10-year survival rates above 90% (Morice et al., 2003; Mangili et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2022). However, inadequate staging negatively impacts outcomes (De la Motte Rouge et al., 2008; Park et al., 2017; Alwazzan et al., 2018). This case illustrates the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in managing ovarian dysgerminoma in a young patient, emphasizing early diagnosis, adequate staging, multidisciplinary care, and individualized treatment planning (NCCN, 2024; ESMO–EURACAN, 2019; Gershenson, 2023).

References

BEREK, Jonathan S.; HACKER, Neville F. Berek & Hacker’s gynecologic oncology. 6. ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.

PRAT, Jaime (Ed.). WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4. ed. Lyon: IARC, 2014. (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, v. 6).

KURMAN, Robert J. et al. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 5. ed. Lyon: IARC, 2020.

LOW, Jennifer J. H. et al. Ovarian germ cell tumours. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, London, v. 26, n. 3, p. 347–355, 2012.

MANGILI, Giorgia et al. Germ cell tumors of the ovary. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam, v. 125, p. 1–12, 2018.

ZALOUDEK, Christopher; NORRIS, H. J. Dysgerminoma of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 67 cases. Cancer, New York, v. 44, n. 2, p. 819–828, 1979.

WILLIAMS, Steven D. et al. Treatment of ovarian germ cell tumors with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP). Journal of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, v. 2, n. 6, p. 689–695, 1984.

MORICE, Philippe et al. Fertility results after conservative treatment of ovarian malignant germ cell tumors. Human Reproduction, Oxford, v. 18, n. 12, p. 2646–2652, 2003.

NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (NCCN). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: ovarian cancer including fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer. Version current. Plymouth Meeting, PA: NCCN, 2024.

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ONCOLOGIA CLÍNICA. Diretrizes de tratamentos oncológicos recomendados pela Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica: Ovário: tumores germinativos. 2022. 19 p. Disponível em: https://app.sboc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/file-46.pdf. Acesso em: 1 fev. 2024.

COLOMBO, Nicoletta et al. ESMO–EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology, Oxford, v. 30, n. 5, p. 672–705, 2019.

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female Genital Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2020.

BEREK JS, HACKER NF. Berek & Hacker's Gynecologic Oncology. 7th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2021.

SMITH HO et al. Ovarian germ cell tumors: epidemiology and clinical behavior. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2020.

ACOG. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 174. Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016.

ESUR guidelines for ovarian/adnexal masses: an imaging approach. European Radiology. 2010;20(1):25–35.

THOMASSIN-NAGGARA I et al. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013

TALERMAN A. Germ cell tumors of the ovary. Gynecologic Oncology. 2007.

KURMAN RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. IARC; 2014.

GERSHENSON DM. Management of ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2007.

PARK JY et al. Prognostic factors and outcomes of ovarian germ cell tumors. Annals of Oncology. 2017.

MCCLUGGAGE WG. Immunohistochemistry in the distinction between ovarian germ cell tumors and other neoplasms. Histopathology. 2006.

YOUNG RH. Ovarian germ cell tumors: a review. Modern Pathology. 2018.

ULBRIGHT TM. Germ cell tumors of the gonads: a selective review. Modern Pathology. 2005.

NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology – Ovarian Cancer. 2023.

RAY-COQUARD I et al. Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology. 2018.

WILLIAMS SD et al. Treatment of germ cell tumors with BEP regimen. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017.

BROWN J et al. Surgical management of ovarian germ cell tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014.

DU BOIS A et al. Ovarian germ cell tumors: Evolving management strategies. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2020.

MANGILI G et al. Treatment and outcome of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011.

DE LA MOTTE ROUGE T et al. Prognostic factors in ovarian germ cell tumors. European Journal of Cancer. 2008.

DROZ JP et al. Ovarian germ cell tumors: ESMO Clinical Recommendations. Annals of Oncology. 2013.

CHAN JK et al. Prognostic factors and survival in ovarian germ cell tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008.

ZALEWSKI K et al. Treatment outcomes of ovarian germ cell tumors. Oncology Letters. 2018

ZHANG X et al. Oncology and reproductive outcomes of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. 2022.

ALWAZZAN AB et al. Pattern of care and survival outcomes in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors, 2018.

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE. PDQ Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors Treatment. 2023.

GERSHENSON DM. Ovarian germ cell tumors: recent advances. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Sena-Martins, S., Picinini, S., Nakata, T., Nunes, I., Nunes, B., Cardeal, L., … Ribeiro, B. (2026). Ovarian Dysgerminoma in a Young Patient: Balancing Oncologic Safety and Fertility Preservation. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 13(05), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1305.12452