Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival in Females after Single, Multiple, and Total Arterial Grafting

Authors

  • Tharun Rajasekar Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, United Kingdom
  • Nandor Marczin Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Sunil K. Bhudia Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Shahzad G. Raja Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1304.12097

Keywords:

Arterial grafting strategy, coronary artery bypass grafting, deep sternal wound infection, female, long-term survival

Abstract

Objective: Arterial grafting strategies in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may influence outcomes, particularly in female patients, who remain underrepresented in cardiovascular research. This study aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes and long-term survival in females undergoing single arterial grafting (SAG), multiple arterial grafting (MAG), and total arterial grafting (TAG). Methods: A retrospective cohort of 2,093 female patients undergoing CABG was stratified into SAG (n=1,507), MAG (n=307), and TAG (n=279). Baseline demographics, procedural characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Long-term survival was assessed using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression, accounting for age, comorbidities, and extent of coronary artery disease. Results: TAG and MAG patients were significantly younger than SAG patients (p<0.001). TAG patients had fewer prior myocardial infarctions (p=0.003) and lower diabetes prevalence (p=0.003). Deep sternal wound infection was more frequent in TAG (7.2%) compared to SAG (2.6%, p=0.003). Thirty-day mortality and other short-term complications did not differ significantly across groups. Weighted Cox regression revealed no significant difference in long-term survival between grafting strategies (MAG HR=1.193, p=0.213; TAG HR=0.952, p=0.729). Age and prior cardiac surgery were independent predictors of mortality. The proportional hazards assumption was met (global test p=0.378), and Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed comparable survival across groups (Wald χ²=0.56, p=0.755). Conclusion: In female patients undergoing CABG, TAG was associated with higher wound infection rates but did not confer a survival advantage over SAG or MAG. These findings support individualized arterial grafting strategies based on patient risk profiles and surgical judgment.

References

Doenst T, Thiele H, Haasenritter J, Wahlers T, Massberg S, Haverich A. The Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease—Current Status Six Decades After the First Bypass Operation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022;119:716-723. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0277.

Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Gaudino M, Zamvar V, Bochenek A, Buxton B, Choong C, Clark S, Deja M, Desai J, Hasan R, Jasinski M, O'Keefe P, Moraes F, Pepper J, Seevanayagam S, Sudarshan C, Trivedi U, Wos S, Puskas J, Flather M; Arterial Revascularization Trial Investigators. Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783. .

Gaudino M, Bairey Merz CN, Sandner S, Creber RM, Ballman KV, O'Brien SM, Harik L, Perezgrovas-Olaria R, Mehran R, Safford MM, Fremes SE. Randomized Comparison of the Outcome of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts trial (ROMA):Women-a trial dedicated to women to improve coronary bypass outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;167:1316-1321.

Gaudino M, Chadow D, Rahouma M, Soletti GJ, Sandner S, Perezgrovas-Olaria R, Audisio K, Cancelli G, Bratton BA, Fremes S, Kurlansky P, Girardi L, Habib RH. Operative Outcomes of Women Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the US, 2011 to 2020. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:494-502. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8156.

Gaudino M, Di Mauro M, Fremes SE, Di Franco A. Representation of Women in Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e020513. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020513.

Sandner S, Redfors B, An KR, Harik L, Heise R, Di Franco A, Fremes SE, Hare DL, Kulik A, Lamy A, Peper J, Ruel M, Ten Berg JM, Willemsen LM, Zhao Q, Zhu Y, Wojdyla DM, Bhatt DL, Alexander JH, Gaudino M. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Failure in Women: Incidence and Clinical Implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.046.

Tam DY, Rocha RV, Fang J, Ouzounian M, Chikwe J, Lawton J, Ko DT, Austin PC, Gaudino M, Fremes SE. Multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting is associated with greater survival in women. Heart. 2021;107:888-894. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317737.

Drevets PD, Lee R. Commentary: Multiple arterial grafting seems promising, but where is the proof of a long-term survival benefit in women? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;165:1102-1103. Scholar Publishing

Rubens FD, Wells GA, Coutinho T, Eddeen AB, Sun LY. Sex differences after coronary artery bypass grafting with a second arterial conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163:686-695.e10.

Ren J, Bowyer A, Tian DH, Royse C, El-Ansary D, Royse A. Multiple arterial vs. single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: sex-related differences in outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:2536-2544. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae294.

Aboul-Hassan SS, Hirnle G, Perek B, Jemielity M, Hirnle T, Brykczynski M, Deja M, Rogowski J, Cisowski M, Krejca M, Anisimowicz L, Widenka K, Gerber W, Pacholewicz J, Bugajski P, Stepinski P, Maruszewski BJ, Cichon R, Hrapkowicz T; KROK Investigators. Single versus multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in men and women: results from Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures. Int J Surg. 2024;110:2234-2242. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001133.

Gaudino M, Samadashvili Z, Hameed I, Chikwe J, Girardi LN, Hannan EL. Differences in Longterm Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts and the Association With Sex. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:401-409. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6585.

Robinson NB, Lia H, Rahouma M, Audisio K, Soletti G Jr, Demetres M, Leonard JR, Fremes SE, Girardi LN, Gaudino M. Coronary artery bypass with single versus multiple arterial grafts in women: A meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;165:1093-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.07.047.

Briscoe JB, Lawton JS. Improving coronary artery bypass grafting in women: Difficulties and outcomes. J Updates Cardiovasc Med. 2025;13:8–16. doi:10.32596/jucvm.galenos.2025.2024.17.77.

Elhassan H, Amjad R, Palaniappan U, Loubani M, Rose D. The negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of sternal wound infection: Can we reduce infection rate after the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19:87. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02589-y.

Changal K, Masroor S, Elzanaty A, Patel M, Mir T, Khan S, Nazir S, Soni R, Oostra C, Khuder S, Eltahawy E. Meta-Analysis Comparing Multiple Arterial Grafts Versus Single Arterial Graft for Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2020;130:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.012.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Rajasekar, T., Marczin, N., Bhudia, S. K., & Raja, S. G. (2026). Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival in Females after Single, Multiple, and Total Arterial Grafting. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 13(04), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1304.12097

Most read articles by the same author(s)