Initial Experience with Robot-Assisted Hiatal Hernioplasty: A Case Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1301.19955Keywords:
Robotic Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Hiatal Hernia, Latin AmericaAbstract
Introduction: Hiatal hernia is a common pathology whose prevalence increases with age and obesity. Although laparoscopy has been the standard in its surgical treatment, the robotic approach has emerged as a promising alternative, offering greater precision, better ergonomics, and three-dimensional visualization. This study aims to present our initial experience with robot-assisted hiatal hernioplasty through a specific surgical technique and the analysis of a series of clinical cases operated with this approach. Clinical Cases: Four patients with symptomatic hiatal hernias refractory to medical treatment were operated on. All procedures were performed using Nissen-type fundoplication technique, utilizing three robotic arms. Surgical time ranged between 127 and 224 minutes, with no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients had good tolerance to the postoperative nutritional plan, adequate reflux control, and hospital discharge between 24 and 48 hours. No recurrences or symptoms were reported at one-month follow-up. Results: Patients who underwent minimally invasive and robotic surgery, despite not being exempt from complications, demonstrated benefits such as shorter hospital stay (48 hours), minimal bleeding, and efficient docking times. The use of three robotic arms reduced costs by 30%. Although meshes were not used for hiatal hernias, their potential benefits are recognized. Conclusion: Robot-assisted hiatal hernioplasty is a safe, reproducible technique with excellent postoperative results. Standardization of the procedure and training of the multidisciplinary team are fundamental to optimizing clinical outcomes. This approach represents an evolution in minimally invasive surgery and should be considered as a valid option in centers with experience in robotic surgery.
References
Richter JE, Rubenstein JH. Presentation and Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):267-276. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.045
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases: Official Journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2013;9(6):920-924. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.03.013
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy: SRA. 2012;34(4):291-299. doi:10.1007/s00276-011-0904-9
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases: Official Journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019;15(11):1949-1955. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.553 Scholar Publishing
Stein J, Connor S, Virgin G, Ong DE, Pereyra L. Anemia y deficiencia de hierro en afecciones gastrointestinales y hepáticas. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(35):7908-7925. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7908
Daly, S., Kumar, S.S., Collings, A.T. et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 38, 4765–4775 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11092-3
Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll‑Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ. ACG Clinical Guideline: Clinical Use of Esophageal pH Monitoring for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):27–56.
Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, et al.; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4409‑28.
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): SAGES; 2021
Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Mecanismos del esófago de Barrett (clínicos): disfunción del LOS, hernia hiatal, defectos peristálticos. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29(1):17-28. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2014.11.002
Andolfi C, Jalilvand A, Plana A, Fisichella PM. Tratamiento quirúrgico de las hernias paraesofágicas: una revisión. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(10):778-783. doi:10.1089/lap.2016.0332
Collet D, Luc G, Chiche L. Manejo de grandes hernias de hiato paraesofágicas. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(6):395-402. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.07.002
Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):226-238. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.007
Vasudevan V, Reusche R, Nelson E, Kaza S. Reparación robótica de hernia paraesofágica: una experiencia de un solo centro y una revisión sistemática. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):81-86. doi:10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x
Correa Restrepo, J. .; Morales Uribe, C. H. .; Toro Vásquez, J. P. Reparación laparoscópica De Hernia Hiatal Gigante: Técnica Quirúrgica Y Seguimiento clínico, endoscópico Y radiológico . Rev Colomb Cir 2020, 35, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.580
Karikis I, Pachos N, Mela E, Saliaris K, Kitsou E, Linardoutsos D, et al. Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes. Hernia. 2024;28:1559-1569. doi:10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5
Hosein S, Carlson T, Flores L, Armijo PR, Oleynikov D. Minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair is superior to open, even in the emergent setting: a large national database analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(2):423-428. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07404-y
Ma L, Luo H, Kou S, Gao Z, Bai D, Qin X, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2023;17:1879-1890. doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01636-5
Hafez J, Wrba F, Lenglinger J, Miholic J. Fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux and factors associated with the outcome 6 to 10 years after the operation: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors using the propensity score. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(8):1763. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9768-9
Hagen ME, Jung MK, Ris F, Morel P, Buchs NC. Early clinical experience with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in general surgery. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(3):347-353. doi:10.1007/s11701-016-0664-3
Müller-Stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, Stock C, Linke GR, Fritz F, et al. Use of mesh in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and risk-benefit analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139547. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139547
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Claudia Viviana Jaimes González, Andrés Hanssen, Gonzalo Andrés Domínguez Alvarado, Mariana Lucía López Rodríguez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.