Mesh Repaire of Inguinal Hernia- A Novel Approach Through Superficial Inguinal Ring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1301.20050Abstract
Background : Mesh repair of inguinal hernia is the standard procedure with recurrence rate 0.5%. An oblaique inguinal incision of4-5 cm. is used for the open mesh repair. This needs inguinal canal to be opened after incising the external oblique aponeurosis. Recurrence and chronic pain are the usual complications. Instead of the classical incision a mini incision approach through superficial inguinal ring was contemplated. Methods: The study group comprised of 86 male patients with inguinal hernia during the period 2012-2016. Data regarding patient demographics, type of anesthesia given, operation performed and complications were recoded. The operation was carried under spinal or epidural anesthesia. The superficial inguinal ring was palpated and a transverse incision of 1.5 cms. was made over it. Retractors were applied and a space was created to facilitate lifting of cord stucters. The indirect sac was dissected, ligated and excised. The direct sac was pushed inside. The mesh was sutured to the inguinal ligament by interrupted proline sutres and the other side to the conjoint tendon by retracting the wound. The patients were followed up in the post-operative period. Results: There were 86 men with age range of 22- 65 years ( mean 38.5). On examination, 65 patients had indirecet hernia and 20 had direct inguinal hernia. They were operated under spinal anesthesia and 11 under epidural anesthesia. None of the patients were operated under general, local or regional anesthesia. The incision size at superficial ring and measured at the end of the operation was1.4cm, (range1.2 -2cm). By retracting the margins of the external ring upwards by retractors the spermatic cord could be lifted up easily after lifting up from floor of inguinal canal, the indirect sac could be identified, transfixation, ligation and excision of sac was done without difficulty. In direct inguinal hernia, the sac was not opened and was inverted with non absorbable suture (3-0 silk.). The mesh could be easily passed underneath the external oblique, spread and sutured. 3- sutures could be applied by retracting the external oblique. The mean operation time was 42 minutes (range40-52 minutes).There was no post-operative hematoma or scrotal edema in any of the patients. One patient had wound infection, which was treated by dressings. The mean hospital stay was 4.4 days(range 4-6.5 days).Pain in the post-operative period was 1-2 as per visual analogue scale... There was no hematoma or scrotal edema in any of the patients. During the men follow up period of 48 moths(range 12-60 months),there was no recurrence and patient had chronic pain. Conclusion: Open mesh repair of inguinal hernia with a mini incision over the superficial inguinal ring with retraction, gives adequate exposure to place the mesh and repair the hernia.:
References
Hernia Surge Group: International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 2018;22:1-
McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A, Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785]
Amid PK. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World Journal of Surgery 2005;28:1046–51.
Köckerling F, Simons M.P. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visc.Med 2018,34:145-150
Srinivas NM,Devaprashant M,Lichehtenstein mesh hernioplasty: the extreme refinementin hernia surgery. International sugery Journal 2018,5:87-91
Stoppa RE, Petit J, Henry X. Unsutured Dacron prosthesis in groin hernias. Int Surg. 1975; 60: 411–419.
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989; 157: 188–193.
Popp LW. Endoscopic patch repair of inguinal hernia in a female patient. Surg Endosc. 1990; 4: 10–12.
Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Duncan TD. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: A review of 900 cases. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10: 255–232.
Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. The Lichtenstein repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:1025–1046.
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open "Tension-Free" repair of inguinal hernias; The Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg. 1996; 162: 447–453.
Goldstein HS. Selecting the right mesh. Hernia. 1999; 3: 23–26.
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia. Ann Surg. 1996; 223: 249–252.
Capozzi JA, Berkenfield JA, Cheaty JK. Repair of inguinal hernia in the adult with proline mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988;167:124–128.
Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. A survey of non-expert surgeons using the open tensionfree mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias. Int Surg. 1995; 80: 35–3.
Aroori S, Spencer RA. Chronic pain after hernia surgery-an informed consent issue. Ulster Med J 2007; 76: 136-140.
Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM et al. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 122-126.
Staal E, Nienhuijs SW, Keemers-Geels ME et al. The impact of pain on daily activities following open mesh inguinal hernia repair. Hernia2008, 12: 153-157.
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanell G et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 2011; 15: 239-249.
Lourenço A, da Costa RS. The ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair technique: initial clinical experience of 693 patients, in two institutions. Hernia. 2013; 17: 357-364.
Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO et al Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg. 2010; 34: 3059-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Subrahmanyam, V.V. Spandana, S. Rajkumar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.