Sociology: Challenges and Reflections

Sandro Serpa
  • Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of the Azores, Portugal
Carlos Miguel Ferreira
  • Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences – CICS.NOVA; ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal
  • Keywords:
  • Pedagogical Component, Sociology Faces, Interdisciplinarity, Socialisation Processes
  • Abstract:
  • Sociology, the science that, in the analysis of the complexity of social reality, relates the social to the social (Durkheim). What is it, what is it for, how is it done, how is it taught, what does it mean to be a sociologist? These are some of the questions that are on the basis of this book, as a contribution to the analysis of some of the contemporary challenges Sociology faces. This work consists of a collection of some published articles that address subjects such as the issue of Sociology being a form of scientific knowledge that, building its object of analysis through the mobilisation of the theory of its body of knowledge, seeks to account for social reality, always reflecting critically on its activity. This book intends to articulate rigour with a pedagogical component, inasmuch that several of the chapters were underpinned by our activity as teachers.
  1. Ágoas, F. (2017). História das ideias, história das ciências humanas e Sociologia do conhecimento [History of ideas, history of human sciences and Sociology of knowledge]. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos,
  2. (2), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702017000200009
  3. Almeida, J. F. (Coord.) (1994). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
  4. Au, A. (2018). Sociology and science: The making of a social scientific method. The American Sociologist, 49(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-9348-y
  5. Bartolucci, J. (2017). La ciencia como problema sociológico [Science as a sociological problem].
  6. Sociológica, 32(92), 9-40.
  7. Berthelot, J. M. (1992). L’intelligence du social [The intelligence of the social]. Paris: PUF.
  8. Berthelot, J. M. (2000). Os novos desafios epistemológicos da Sociologia [The new epistemological challenges of Sociology]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 33, 111-131.
  9. Bilhim, J. A. F. (2005). Teoria organizacional. Estruturas e pessoas [Organisational theory. Structures and persons]. Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.
  10. Bögenhold, D. (2017). The order of social sciences: Sociology in dialogue with neighbouring disciplines.
  11. The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, XI(1), 27-52.
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2013). Elogio da Sociologia: Discurso de aceitação da Medalha de Ouro do CNRS [Praise of
  13. Sociology: Acceptance speech for the Gold Medal of the CNRS]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais,
  14. (83), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69092013000300002
  15. Butollo, F. (2017). Sociology as science and action. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 42(1), 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-017-0258-6
  16. Christoffersen, M. L., Almeida, W. O., & Lycurgo, T. (2009). Sociology of science: Are knowledge production and the quest for scientific status two divergent courses? História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 16(2), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702009000200012
  17. Condorelli, R. (2018). Cultural differentiation and social integration in complex modern societies.
  18. Reflections on cultural diversity management strategies from a sociological point of view. Sociology Mind, 8, 249-303. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2018.84019
  19. Correia, A. C. L. (2005). Na bancada do alquimista: As transformações curriculares dos ensinos primários e liceal em Portugal (1860-1960) [In the alchemist’s bench: The curricular transformations of elementary and high school teaching in Portugal (1860-1960)]. PhD Thesis in Educational Sciences (History of Education). Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa.
  20. Costa, A. F. (1992). Sociologia [Sociology]. Lisboa: Difusão Cultural.
  21. Dubar, C. (2006). Le pluralisme en Sociologie: Fondements, limites, enjeu [Pluralism in Sociology: Foundations, limits, stakes]. Socio-Logos, 1. Retrieved from http://socio-logos.revues.org/20 Elias, N. (2008). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Edições 70.
  22. Durkheim, E. (1993). As regras do método sociológico [The rules of sociological method] 5th ed. [1895] Lisboa: Editorial Presença.
  23. Estrada, A. R. (2016). Tensiones teóricas en torno al estudio de la ciencia. De la Sociología de la ciência al concepto de campo científico [Theoretical tensions around the study of science. From Sociology of science to the concept of scientific field]. Andamios, 13(31), 13-36.
  24. Ferguson, S. J. (2016). The center does hold: The sociological literacy framework. Teach. Sociol. 44, 163-
  25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16651478
  26. Ferreira, C. (2007). A medicalização dos sanatórios populares. Desafios e formas de um processo social [The medicalisation of popular sanatoria. Challenges and forms of a social process]. PhD Thesis in Sociology. Lisboa: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
  27. Ferreira, C., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies, 7(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030
  28. Garcia, F. J. C. (2016). Ciencia, revolución y nacimiento de la Sociología [Science, revolution and birth of
  29. Sociology]. Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 17(33), 163-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.22518/16578953.906
  30. Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018). The “vocation” redux: A post-Weberian perspective from the Sociology of knowledge. Current Sociology, 001139211875647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118756472 Hjelm, T. (2013). Empowering discourse: Discourse analysis as method and practice in the Sociology
  31. classroom. Teach. High. Educ., 18, 871-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.795940 Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  32. Jedlikowska, D. (2016). In searching for science understanding. Applying the Sociology of a science based approach. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 7(2), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20162.11.19
  33. Kurawa, S. S. (2012). Social order in Sociology: Its reality and elusiveness. Sociology Mind, 02(01), 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/sm.2012.21004
  34. Lyle, K. (2016). Shaping the future of Sociology: The challenge of interdisciplinarity beyond the Social Sciences. Sociology, 51(6), 1169-1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516653728
  35. Lellouche, S. (2009). As ciências sociais no tempo das redes [Social Sciences in the networks era]. In J.-F. Dortier (Dir.), Uma história das ciências humanas [An history of human sciences] (pp. 269-272). Lisboa: Edições Texto & Grafia.
  36. Machado Júnior, C., Souza, M. T. S., Parisotto, I. R. S., & Palmisano, A. (2016). A contribuição da Sociologia do conhecimento para os estudos de institucionalização e legitimação do conhecimento do campo científico [The contribution of Sociology of knowledge to the studies of knowledge institutionalisation and legitimation in the scientific field]. Organizações & Sociedade, 23(77), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230773
  37. Matas, J. A. V. (2018). Values and science: An analysis the ethics in the science. Sociology International
  38. Journal, 2(3), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00056
  39. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Miskolczi, P., & Király, G. (2016). Teaching society? Looking for new ways to teach Sociology in contemporary Hungary. Družboslovne Razprave, 32(83), 63-81.
  41. Morrison, A. (2017). A sociologist teaches history: Some epistemological and pedagogical reflections. Educational Studies, 53(3), 233-246.
  42. Nunes, A. S. (2005). Questões preliminares sobre as ciências sociais (13rd ed.) [Preliminary issues about the social sciences]. Barcarena: Editorial Presença.
  43. Oglensky, B. (2016). Saving face in cyberspace: Transition to on-line teaching in a Sociology program. Sociology and Anthropology, 4(10), 915-921. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2016.041007
  44. Paiva, A. (2014). Pensamento sociológico. Uma introdução didática às teorias clássicas [Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories]. Lisboa: PACTOR – Edições de Ciências Sociais, Forenses e da Educação.
  45. Reed, I. A. (2016). Ethnography, theory, and Sociology as a human science: An interlocution. Ethnography, 18(1), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603519847745
  46. Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The importance of promoting digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(6), 90. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i6.2330 Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. (2018). Training models and practices in Sociology. Societies, 8(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030056
  47. Serpa, S., Ferreira, C. M., & Santos, A. I. (2017). Fostering interdisciplinarity: Implications for social sciences. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(12), 44. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i12.2775
  48. Sethuraju, N., Prew, P., Abdi, A., & Pipkins, M. (2013). The consequences of teaching critical Sociology on course evaluations. SAGE Open, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013496182
  49. Silva, A. S., & Pinto, J. M. (1986). Uma visão global sobre as ciências sociais [An overview of social sciences]. In A. S. Silva, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Metodologia das Ciências Sociais, 8th ed. [Methodology of Social Sciences] (pp. 9-27). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  50. Silva, A. S. (1986). A ruptura com o senso comum nas ciências sociais [The rupture with common sense in social sciences]. In A. S. Silva, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Metodologia das ciências sociais, 8th ed. [Methodology of Social Sciences] (pp. 29-53). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  51. Silva, A. S. (1994). Tempos cruzados. Um estudo interpretativo da cultura popular [Crossed times. An interpretative study of popular culture]. Porto: Afrontamento.
  52. Vieira, M. M. (2004). Converter incrédulos: A Sociologia na cidade das ciências duras [Converting skeptics: Sociology in the city of hard sciences]. In C. M. Gonçalves, E. Rodrigues, & N. Azevedo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research]. Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  53. Tang, J. (2017). How do we know? What intelligence analysis can learn from the Sociology of science.
  54. Intelligence and National Security, 32(5), 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2017.1311473
  55. Tanguy, L. (2012). A Sociologia: Ciência e ofício [Sociology: Science and craft]. Educação & Sociedade,
  56. (118), 33-46. Retrieved from http://www.cedes.unicamp.br
  57. Teplitskiy, M., Acuna, D., Elamrani-Raoult, A., Körding, K., & Evans, J. (2018). The Sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review. Research Policy, 47(9), 1825-1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.014
  58. Torres, F. (2016). Aproximaciones al conocimiento de lo social: Entre teoría social y Sociologia [Approaches to the knowledge of the social: Between social theory and Sociology]. Cinta de Moebio, 55, 106-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2016000100008
  59. Zougris, K. (2018). Communities of scholars: A conceptual scheme of knowledge production. Societies,
  60. (4), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8040118
  61. Zuckerman, H. (2018). The Sociology of science and the Garfield effect: Happy accidents, unanticipated developments and unexploited potentials. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3.
  62. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00020
  63. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). Sociology as scientific knowledge. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(3), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-20190035.
  64. Almeida, J. F. (1995). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
  65. Almeida, J. F., & Pinto, J. M. (1986). Da teoria à investigação empírica, problemas metodológicos [From theory to empirical research, methodological problems]. In A. S. Silva, & J. M. Pinto (Orgs.), Metodologia das ciências sociais [Methodology of social sciences] (8th ed.) (pp. 55-78). Porto: Edições Afrontamento. Au, A. (2017). Sociology and science: The making of a social scientific method. The American Sociologist, 49(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-9348-y
  66. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action [Practical reasons: On the action theory]. Paris: Seuil.
  67. Cherkaoui, M. (1990). Socialização [Socialisation]. In R. Boudon, P. Besnard, M. Cherkaoui, & B.-P. Lécuyer (Dirs.), Dicionário de Sociologia [Dictionary of Sociology] (p. 227). Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
  68. Costa, A. F. (1992). Sociologia – O que é? [Sociology – What is it?] Lisboa: Difusão Cultural.
  69. Durkheim, E. (1895/1998). As regras do método sociológico [The rules of the sociological method]. Lisboa:
  70. Editorial Presença.
  71. Elias, N. (2011). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Edições 70.
  72. Ferreira, C. M. (2007). A medicalização dos sanatórios populares. Desafios e formas de um processo social [The medicalisation of popular sanatoria. Challenges and forms of a social process]. Lisboa: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Ph.D. Thesis.
  73. Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2017). Essay challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies, 7(30), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030 Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  74. Lenoir, R. (1990). Objet sociologique et problème social [Sociological object and social problem]. In P. Champagne, R. Lenoir, D. Merllié, & L. Pinto, Initiation à la pratique sociologique [Initiation to sociological practice] (pp. 57-100). Paris: Dunod.
  75. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  76. Mora, M. A. (2015). Algunos problemas de fundamentación y justificación sociológica: Apuntes en el marco del debate teórico de la Sociología contemporánea [Some problems of sociological justification and foundation: Notes on the theoretical debate of contemporary Sociology]. Revista ABRA, 35(50). https://doi.org/10.15359/abra.35-50.1
  77. Mozzicafreddo, J. (1985). Liberalismo, política e democracia [Liberalism, politics and democracy]. Revista de Comunicação e Linguagens, 2, Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  78. Nunes, A. S. (2005). Questões preliminares sobre as ciências sociais [Preliminary issues on social sciences] (13rd ed.). Barcarena: Editorial Presença.
  79. Paiva, A. (2014). Pensamento sociológico. Uma introdução didática às teorias clássicas [Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories]. Lisboa: PACTOR: Edições de Ciências Sociais, Forenses e da Educação.
  80. Parra Saiani, P. (2017). Doing Sociology in the age of “evidence-based research”: Scientific epistemology versus political dominance. The American Sociologist, 49(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-
  81. -9
  82. Pires, R. P. (2012). O problema da ordem [The problem of order]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 69, 3145. http://dx.doi.org/10.7458/SPP201269785
  83. Santos, J. R. (1999). A propósito das noções de “problema social” e “problema sociológico” [On the notions of “social problem” and “sociological problem”]. In Homenagem ao Professor Augusto da Silva [Tribute to Professor Augusto da Silva] (pp. 417-441). Évora: Universidade de Évora, Departament of Sociology.
  84. Serpa, S. (2018). A reflection on Sociology of Education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(3), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i3.3013
  85. Silva, A. S. (1986). A ruptura com o senso comum nas ciências sociais [The rupture with common sense in social sciences]. In A. S. Silva, & J. M. Pinto (Orgs.), Metodologia das ciências sociais [Methodology of social sciences] (8th ed.) (pp. 29-53). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  86. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2018). Sociological problem and social problem: Contributions to a discussion. Sociology and Anthropology, 6(11), 840-844.
  87. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2018.061104.
  88. Akbar, M. (2016). Digital technology shaping teaching practices in higher education. Frontiers in ICT, 3, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2016.00001
  89. Alhija, F. N.-A. (2017). Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.006
  90. Almeida, A. N. (2009). Uma introdução: Sociologia, sociólogos e práticas profissionais. Percursos de construção da identidade no Portugal democrático [An introduction: Sociology, sociologists and professional practices. Paths of identity construction in the democratic Portugal]. In H. Carreiras, F. Freitas, & I. Valente (Eds.), Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist] (pp. 1-10). Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  91. Almeida, J. (Ed.) (1994). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta. Arends, R. I. (1995). Aprender a ensinar [Learning to teach]. Lisboa: McGraw-Hill.
  92. Associação Portuguesa de Sociologia (APS) [Portuguese Association of Sociology] (1992). Código deontológico [Code of ethics]. Retrieved from https://www.aps.pt/pt/codigo-deontologico
  93. Auken, P. V. (2011). Maybe it’s both of us: Engagement and learning. Teaching Sociology, 41, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12457959
  94. Bassey, M. O. (2017). Culturally responsive teaching: Implications for educational justice. Education
  95. Sciences, 6(4), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040035
  96. Berthelot, J. M. (1992). L’intelligence du social [The intelligence of the social]. Paris: PUF.
  97. Berthelot, J. M. (2000). Os novos desafios epistemológicos da Sociologia [The new epistemological challenges of Sociology]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 33, 111-131.
  98. Bívar, A. (1999). Nome, nomeado, seja feita a nossa vontade [Name, nominee, may our will be done]. In H. Carreiras, F. Freitas, & I. Valente (Eds.), Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist] (pp. 19-31). Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  99. Bryan, A. (2016). The Sociology classroom as a pedagogical site of discomfort: Difficult knowledge and the emotional dynamics of teaching and learning. Irish Journal of Sociology, 24, 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603516629463
  100. Carlin, A. P. (2010). The corpus status of literature in teaching Sociology: Novels as “sociological reconstruction”. The American Sociologist, 41(3), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9096-8 Carreira, H., Freitas, F., & Valente, I. (Eds.) (1999). Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  101. Carvalho Filho, J. L. (2014). O ensino de Sociologia como problema epistemológico e sociológico [The teaching of Sociology as an epistemological and sociological problem]. Educação & Realidade, 39(1), 5980.
  102. Costa, A. F. (1988). Cultura profissional dos sociólogos [Professional culture of sociologists]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 5, 107-124.
  103. Costa, A. F. (2004). Será a Sociologia profissionalizável? [Is Sociology possible to professionalise?]. In C. M. Gonçalves, E. Rodrigues, & N. Azevedo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research] (pp. 35-58). Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  104. Costa, A. F. (1992). Sociologia [Sociology]. Lisboa: Difusão Cultural.
  105. Dourado, I. P. (2016). Mediação didática no ensino superior – Inventividade, níveis de abstração e o uso da metáfora como recurso didático no ensino de Sociologia [Didactic mediation in higher Education – Inventiveness, levels of abstraction and the use of metaphor as didactic resource in the teaching of Sociology]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino Superior, 2, 34-45.
  106. Dubar, C. (2006). Le pluralisme en Sociologie: Fondements, limites, enjeu [Pluralism in Sociology: Foundations, limits, stakes]. Socio-Logos, 1. Retrieved from http://socio-logos.revues.org/20
  107. Egreja, C. (2016). O ensino da Sociologia em cursos superiores de outras áreas de formação: A perspetiva de docentes e diretores [The teaching of Sociology in higher education programmes in other educational areas: The perspective of faculty and directors]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 82, 125-143.
  108. Elias, N. (2017). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Edições 70.
  109. Elliot, A., & Turner, B. S. (2012). Debating “the social”: Towards a critique of sociological nostalgia. Societies, 2, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc2010014
  110. Espinosa, E. L., García, J. M., & Albero, C. T. (1994). La Sociología del conocimiento y de la ciencia [Sociology of knowledge and science]. Madrid Alianza Editorial.
  111. Esteves, A. J. (2004). Métodos, práticas pedagógicas e públicos da Sociologia: Um ponto de vista situado [Methods, pedagogical practices and public of Sociology: A situated point of view]. In C. M. Gonçalves, E. Rodrigues, & N. Azevedo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research] (pp. 61-77). Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  112. Ferguson, S. J. (2016). The center does hold: The sociological literacy framework. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16651478
  113. Flores, M. A., Simão, A. M. V., Albuquerque, T., Parente, C., Barros, A., & Flores, P. (2015). Melhorar as aprendizagens através da avaliação: O potencial dos métodos centrados nos alunos no contexto do ensino superior [Improving learning through assessment: The potential of student-centred methods in the context of higher education]. In Ministério da Educação e Ciência. Experiências de inovação didática no ensino superior [Ministry of Education and Science. Experiences of didactic innovation in higher education] (pp. 211-228). Lisboa: Governo de Portugal, Secretário de Estado do Ensino Superior.
  114. Gonçalves, C. M., Rodrigues, E., & Azevedo, N. (Eds.) (2004). Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research]. In Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research]. Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  115. Greenwood, N. A. (2013). Toward publicly responsive Sociology curricula: The role of introductory sociology. Teaching Sociology, 41, 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X13485026
  116. Guerreiro, M. D. (1987). Questões pedagógicas no ensino da Sociologia [Pedagogical issues in the teaching of Sociology]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 3, 51-65.
  117. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2013). Challenging frameworks for understanding teaching practices in higher education: The end or the beginning? Qualitative Research in Education, 2, 65-91.
  118. Harley, K., & Natalier, K. (2013). Teaching Sociology – Reflections on the discipline. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 389-396.
  119. Haynes, A. (2017). In support of disciplinarity in teaching Sociology: Reflections from Ireland. Teaching Sociology, 45, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16664397
  120. Hedden, M. K., Worthy, R., Akins, E., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Paul, R. C. (2017). Teaching sustainability using an active learning constructivist approach: Discipline-specific case studies in higher education. Sustainability, 9(8), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081320
  121. Hill, A., Arford, T., Lubitow, A., & Smollin, L. M. (2012). “I’m ambivalent about it”: The dilemmas of PowerPoint. Teaching Sociology, 40, 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12444071
  122. Hjelm, T. (2013). Empowering discourse: Discourse analysis as method and practice in the Sociology classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 871-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.795940 International Sociology Association (ISA) (2001). Code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.isasociology.org/en/about-isa/code-of-ethics/
  123. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  124. Kapitulik, B. P. (2013). Teaching Sociology in community college: Balancing ideals with institutional constraints. The American Sociologist, 44(4), 366-377.
  125. Machado, F. L. (2004). Quatro princípios para o ensino da Sociologia [Four principles for the teaching of Sociology]. In C. M. Gonçalves, E. Rodrigues, & N. Azevedo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research] (pp. 115-120). Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  126. Mårtensson, K., & Roxå, T. (2016). Peer engagement for teaching and learning: Competence, autonomy and social solidarity in academic microcultures. Uniped, 39(2), 131-143.
  127. Massengill, R. P. (2001). Sociological writing as higher-level thinking: Assignments that cultivate the sociological imagination. Teaching Sociology, 39, 371-381.
  128. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  129. Ministério da Educação e Ciência (2015). Experiências de inovação didática no ensino superior [Experiences of didactic innovation in higher education]. Lisboa: Governo de Portugal, Secretário de Estado do Ensino Superior.
  130. Miskolczi, P., & Király, G. (2016). Teaching society? Looking for new ways to teach Sociology in contemporary Hungary. Družboslovne Razprave, 32, 83, 63-81.
  131. Moreira, G., Pinheiro, M. M., & Simões, A. R. (2015). Pensar e partilhar práticas de qualidade no ensino superior [Thinking and sharing quality practices in higher education]. In Ministério da Educação e Ciência, Experiências de inovação didática no ensino superior [Ministry of Education and Science. Experiences of didactic innovation in higher education] (pp. 97-116). Lisboa: Governo de Portugal, Secretário de Estado do Ensino Superior.
  132. Morrison, A. (2017). A sociologist teaches history: Some epistemological and pedagogical reflections. Educational Studies, 53(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1297301
  133. Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unravelling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85-100. Retrieved from http://iisit.org/Vol11/IISITv11p085-100Murray0507.pdf
  134. Neto, H. V. (2013). Principais estádios evolutivos da Sociologia em Portugal [Main evolutionary stages of Sociology in Portugal]. Sociologia, XXVI, 37-59.
  135. O’Sullivan, S. (2016). Teaching Sociology in an age of teaching ‘excellence’. Irish Journal of Sociology, 24, 34-53. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.0004
  136. Pastrana, L. M. (2009). Knowledge of learning styles. Obligatory starting point for teaching social science in general and the Sociology of education in particular. International Journal of Learning, 16, 155-167. Pedersen, D. E. (2010). Active and collaborative learning in an undergraduate sociological theory course. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10370119
  137. Purcell, D. (2013). Sociology, teaching, and reflective practice: Using writing to improve. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12460028
  138. Sadler, I. (2013). The role of self-confidence in learning to teach in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.760777 Salmon, G., & Wright, P. (2014). Transforming future teaching through ‘Carpe Diem’ learning design. Education Sciences, 4(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4010052
  139. Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The importance of promoting digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(6), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i6.2330 Sethuraju, N., Prew, P., Abdi, A., & Pipkins, M. (2013). The consequences of teaching critical Sociology on course evaluations. SAGE Open, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013496182
  140. Silva, A. S., & Pinto, J. M. (1986). Uma visão global sobre as ciências sociais [An overview of social sciences]. In A. S. Silva, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Metodologia das Ciências Sociais [Methodology of Social Sciences] (8th ed.) (pp. 9-27). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  141. Sparks, J. R., Katz, I. R., & Beile, P. M. (2016). Assessing digital information literacy in higher education: A review of existing frameworks and assessments with recommendations for next-generation assessment.
  142. Research Report No. RR-16-32. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  143. Trowler, P. R. (2005). A Sociology of teaching, learning and enhancement: Improving practices in higher education. Papers, 76, 13-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v76n0.969
  144. Vieira, M. M. (2004). Converter incrédulos: A Sociologia na cidade das ciências duras [Converting skeptics: Sociology in the city of hard sciences]. In C. M. Gonçalves, E. Rodrigues, N. Azevedo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting Sociologia no ensino superior: Conteúdos, práticas pedagógicas e investigação [Sociology in higher education: Contents, pedagogical practices and research]. Porto: School of Humanities of the University of Porto.
  145. Walder, A. M. (2017). Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
  146. Williams, L., Nixon, S., Hennessy, C., Mahon, E., & Adams, G. (2016). Inspiring to inspire: Developing teaching in higher education. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1154259
  147. This Book Chapter is a republication of Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies – Special Issue Training Models and
  148. Practices in Sociology, 7(4), 30, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030.
  149. Alexander, J. (1987). The centrality of the classics. In A. Giddens, & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today. pp 11-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  150. Alexander, J. C. (2019). What social sciences must learn from the humanities. Sociologia & Antropologia,
  151. (1), 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752019v912
  152. Bhambra, G. K., & Santos, B. S. (2017). Introduction: Global challenges for Sociology. Sociology, 51(1), 3-
  153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674665
  154. Centeno, M. A., Chase-Dunn, C., Chorev, N., Grell-Brisk, M., Inoue, H., Larcey, P., Reyes, V., & Surak, K. (2020). For a global social science. Global Perspectives, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.11649 Cockerham, W. C. (2014). Classical Sociology. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society, 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs575
  155. Dayé, C. (2018). A systematic view on the use of history for current debates in Sociology, and on the potential and problems of a historical epistemology of Sociology. The American Sociologist, 49(4), 520-
  156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9385-1
  157. Davis, D. J. (2019). Something old or something new?: Complexity theory and Sociology. Sociation, 18(1), 40-51.
  158. Dhakal, R. K. (2019). A dialogue on social inquiry: Expanding our understanding of sociological thinking. Social Inquiry: Journal of Social Science Research, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3126/sijssr.v1i1.26912 Ferreira, C., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies, 7(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030
  159. Fraga, E. (2019). ¿Qué es, cómo se hace y para qué sirve la teoría? Aportes desde la sociología y sus márgenes [What is it, how is it done, and what is theory for? Contributions from Sociology and its margins]. CS Journal, 28, 181-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.18046/recs.i28.2761
  160. Grimshaw, M. (2017). Digital society and capitalism. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0020-5
  161. Hernández Lara, J. (2018). Desacralizar la enseñanza de los clásicos de la Sociología [Desacralising the teaching of classics in Sociology]. Sociedad y Economía, 35, 198-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/sye.v0i35.7299
  162. Ignatow, G. (2020). Sociological theory in the digital age. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  163. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  164. Johnson, D. P. (2008). Contemporary sociological theory. An integrated multi-level approach. Dordrecht: Springer.
  165. Michalski, J. (2008). Scientific discovery in deep social space: Sociology without borders. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs4153
  166. Michetti, M. (2019). Périplos norte-atlânticos da Sociologia contemporânea: A Sociologia pragmática
  167. [North-Atlantic journeys of contemporary Sociology: The pragmatic Sociology]. Sociologies, 21(52), 298-
  168. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-88997
  169. Nadolu, B., & Nadolu, D. (2020). Homo interneticus – The sociological reality of mobile online being. Sustainability, 12(5), 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051800
  170. Narbut, N. P. (2019). Ten years of historical Sociology in Prague: A new perspective branch of Czech Sociology. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1167-174
  171. Paiva, A. (2014). Pensamento sociológico. Uma introdução didática às teorias clássicas [Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories]. Lisboa: Pactor.
  172. Pinto, T. (2018). “Should we forget the classics?” Contributos para uma reflexão sobre o papel das teorias clássicas no ensino da Sociologia [“Should we forget the classics?” Contributions to a reflection on the role of classical theories in the teaching of Sociology]. Lisboa: ISCTE.
  173. Pi Puig, A. P. (2019). Abordajes sobre el ambiente en la teoría sociológica: Diálogo entre formulaciones del Norte y cuestionamientos al desarrollo del Sur [Approaches to the environment in sociological theory:
  174. Dialogue between formulations from the North and questioning of the development of the South]. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 42(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v42n1.73220
  175. Reinprecht, C., Walch, N., & Šubrt, J. (2019). Mapping the history of Sociology: Places, positioning, dominance and marginality in an emerging discipline. Historická Sociologie, 1, 11-27.
  176. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2019.2
  177. Ritzer, G. (1992). Sociological theory. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
  178. Savić, D.(2015). Weber’s methodological conception today. Defendologija, 1(36). http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/DEFEN1501005S
  179. Serpa, S. (2017). Book review: Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(7), 19-21. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i7.2444 Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. (2018a). Training models and practices in Sociology. Societies, 8(3), 56.
  180. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030056
  181. Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. (2018b). Sociological problem and social problem: Contributions to a discussion. Sociology and Anthropology, 6(11), 840-844. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2018.061104
  182. Social Science Journal (2020). Bernard Lahire, Doctor Honoris Causa. Clivages. Social Science Journal, 12, 18-21. https://doi.org/10.25009/clivajes-rcs.v0i12.2589
  183. Susen, S., & Turner, B. S. (2011). Tradition and innovation in classical Sociology: Tenth anniversary report of JCS. Journal of Classical Sociology, 11(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X10391451 Venegas, M., Martín-Lagos, M. L., Romão, A., & Baptista, L. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue. Connecting sociological research with social problems and public policies: Implications for Southern
  184. European societies. Revista Española de Sociología, 29(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.22325/10.22325/fes/res.2020.01
  185. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2020). Mobilization of the classics in
  186. Sociology. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(3), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-20200043.
  187. Abrutyn, S., & Mueller, A. S. (2014). Reconsidering Durkheim’s assessment of Tarde: Formalizing a Tardian theory of imitation, contagion, and suicide suggestion. Sociological Forum, 29(3), 698-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12110
  188. Alexander, J. C. (1987). The centrality of the classics. In A. Giddens, & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 11-57). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  189. Barry, A., & Thrift, N. (2007). Gabriel Tarde: Imitation, invention and economy. Economy and Society, 36(4), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701589497
  190. Borch, C. (2005). Urban imitations. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405053722
  191. Costa, A. F. (1992). Sociologia [Sociology]. Lisboa: Difusão Cultural.
  192. Cruz, M. B. (1995). Karl Marx – Friedrich Engels. In M. B. Cruz (Ed.), Teorias sociológicas. Os fundadores e os clássicos [Sociological theories. The founders and the classics]. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. Latour, B. (2012). Otra ciencia social es posible [Another social science is possible]. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 23, 194-199. In Vallejos Izquierdo, A. F. (2012). El debate entre Gabriel
  193. Tarde y Émile Durkheim. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.23.2012.834
  194. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  195. Kashima, Y., Laham, S. M., Dix, J., Levis, B., Wong, D., & Wheeler, M. (2015). Social transmission of cultural practices and implicit attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.005
  196. Kinnunen, J. (1996). Gabriel Tarde as a founding father of innovation diffusion research. Acta Sociologica, 39(4), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939603900404
  197. Marsden, P. (2000). Forefathers of memetics: Gabriel Tarde and the Laws of Imitation. Journal of Memetics – Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 4. Retrieved from http://cfpm.org/jomemit/2000/vol4/marsden_p.html
  198. Ramos, M. L. (2014). Tarde. In A. Paiva (Ed.), Pensamento sociológico. Uma introdução didática às teorias clássicas. [Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories] (pp. 193-218). Lisboa: PACTOR – Edições de Ciências Sociais, Forenses e da Educação.
  199. Tarde, G. (1903). The Laws of Imitation. Read Books Ltd. Kindle Edition. Translation from the original Les Lois de l’Imitation de 1890 (Kindle version). New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  200. Teixeira, R. H. (2015). Interfaces da natureza e da sociedade na obra de Gabriel Tarde [Interfaces of nature and society in Gabriel Tarde’s work]. Philósophos – Revista de Filosofia, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v20i1.33482
  201. Vallejos Izquierdo, A. F. (2012). El debate entre Gabriel Tarde y Émile Durkheim. Empiria. Revista de
  202. Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, (23). https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.23.2012.834
  203. This Book Chapter is a republication of Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Imitation in socialization processes. A perspective about Gabriel Tarde. In M. Mokrys, & S. Badura, Proceedings of the 6th Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference (HASSACC-2018) (pp. 24-27), 6, 1, Section 2.7 – Social Sciences – Past, Nowadays and Future, Slovakia. The-Science.com, and Publishing Society, September 2430. EDIS – Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina. ISBN: 978-80-554-1494-2; cdISSN: 1339-522X; eISSN: 2453-6075. https://doi.org/10.18638/hassacc.2018.
  204. Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online (n.d.). What is b-on? Retrieved from https://www.bon.pt/en/whaton.pt/en/what-is-b-on/
  205. Boateng, W. (2013). A sociological overview of knowledge management in macro level health care decision-making. Journal of Sociological Research. 44(2), 1355-146146. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v4i2.3165
  206. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The Sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1818(3-4), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
  207. Ferreira, C. M. (2007). A medicalização dos sanatórios populares. Desafios e formas de um processo social [The medicalisation of popular sanatoria. Challenges and forms of a social process]. PhD thesis in Sociology, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
  208. Ferreira, C., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies, 77(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030
  209. Fine, G. A. (2012). Group culture and the interaction order: Local Sociology on the meso-level. Annual
  210. Review of Sociology, 38(1), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-socsoc-071811071811145518145518
  211. Giddens, A. (1997). Sociologia [Sociology]. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  212. Hartmann, E. (2017). Violence: Constructing an emerging field of Sociology. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 11, 9.
  213. Ibáñez, J. E. R. (1997). De Liliput a Brobdingnag: Nota sobre las relaciones micro-macro en Sociología [From Liliput to Brobdingnag: Note on micro-macro relationships in Sociology]. Revista Española de
  214. Investigaciones Sociológicas, 80, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183921
  215. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  216. Kurawa, S. S. (2012). Social order in Sociology: Its reality and elusiveness. Sociology Mind, 22(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2012.21004
  217. Morais, J. V., & Ratton Jr., J. L. (2005). Gilberto Freyre e a articulação dos níveis micro e macro na Sociologia [Gilberto Freyre and the articulation of micro and macro levels in Sociology]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 2020(58), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092005000200006
  218. Pires, R. P. P. (2012a). O problema da ordem [The problem of order]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 69. https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP20126978 5
  219. Pires, R. P. (2012b). O problema da integração [The problem of integration]. Sociologia, Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade da Universidade do Porto, XXIV, 55-87.
  220. Pires, R. (2014). Modelo teórico de análise sociológica [Theoretical model of sociological analysis]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 74. https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP2014743199
  221. Pires, R. P. (2015). Modos de explicação [Explanation modes]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 78, 125141. https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP2015786687
  222. Pyhtinen, O. (2017). Matters of scale: Sociology in and for a complex world. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 54(3), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12151 Rocher, G. (1989). Sociologia geral. A acção social (Vol I) [General Sociology. Social action (Vol I)]. Lisboa: Editorial Presença.
  223. Sallum Jr., B. (2005). O futuro das Ciências Sociais. A Sociologia em questão [The future of Social Sciences. Sociology in question]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 48, 19-26.
  224. Sell, C. E. (2016). Max Weber e o átomo da sociologia: Um individualismo metodológico moderado? [Max Weber and the atom of Sociology: A moderate methodological individualism?]. Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 16(2), 323-347. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2016.2.221677289.2016.2.22167 Serpa, S. (2017). Book review: Pensamento sociológico. Uma introdução introdução didática às teorias clássicas [Sociological thought. A didactic introduction to classical theories]. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 55(7), 19-21. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i7.2444
  225. Serpa, S. (2018). A reflection on Sociology of Education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 66(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i3.3013
  226. Serpa, S. N. (2016). Organization as an analytical level for investigation organizational culture. The Social Sciences, 1111(13), 3257-3263.
  227. Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2018). Sociological problem and social problem: Contributions to a discussion. Sociology and Anthropology, 66(11), 840-844. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2018.061104
  228. Serpa, S., & Sá, M. J. (2019). Exploring Sociology of Education in the promotion of sustainability literacy in higher education. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 55(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.51.101.116
  229. Wiley, N. (1988). The micro-macro problem in social theory. Sociological Theory, 66(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.2307/202119
  230. Zald, M. N. (1991). Sociology as a discipline: Quasi-science and quasi-humanities. The American Sociologist, 22(3-4), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691895
  231. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). Micro, meso and macro levels of social analysis. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(3), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i3.4223.
  232. Aili, C., & Nilsson, L.-E. (2018). Backstage accounting in preschool: Analysing dealing with complaints as “rehearsing away” professional knowledge. Ethnography and Education, 13(2), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1318080
  233. Andersson, C. (2017). The front and backstage: Pupils’ information activities in secondary school.
  234. Information Research, 22(1), CoLIS paper 1604. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/221/colis/colis1604.html
  235. Brownlie, J., & Shaw, F. (2018). Empathy rituals: Small conversations about emotional distress on Twitter. Sociology, Onine First, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518767075
  236. Bullock, K. (2018). (Re)presenting “order” online: The construction of police presentational strategies on social media. Policing and Society, 28(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1177529 Burns, T., Roszkowska, E., Machado Des Johansson, N., & Corte, U. (2018). Paradigm shift in Game Theory: Sociological re-conceptualization of human agency, social structure, and agents’ cognitive-normative frameworks and action determination modalities. Social Sciences, 7(3), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030040
  237. Bute, M. (2016). A backstage sociologist: Autoethnography and a populist vision. The American Sociologist, 47(4), 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-016-9307-z
  238. Cain, C. L. (2012). Integrating dark humor and compassion. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(6), 668-694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241612458122
  239. Chen, H. (2018). College-aged young consumers’ perceptions of social media marketing: The story of Instagram. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 39(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2017.1372321
  240. Chen, Y. M., & Wang, M. Y. (2018). Applying dramaturgy theory in computer maintenance services. Services Marketing Quarterly, 39(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2017.1398027
  241. Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2016). The frontstage and backstage of corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3375-4
  242. Galindo, J. (2015). Erving Goffman y el orden de la interacción [Erving Goffman and the interaction order].
  243. Acta Sociológica, 66, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2014.11.002
  244. Giddens, A. (1997). Sociologia [Sociology]. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  245. Gilmore, D. M. (2014). Goffman’s front stage and backstage behaviors in online education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 187-190. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.13.19
  246. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  247. Goffman, E. (1988). Estigma. Notas sobre a manipulação da identidade deteriorada [Stigma. Notes on manipulating the deteriorated identity]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara.
  248. Goffman, E. (1993). A apresentação do eu na vida de todos os dias [The presentation of the self in everyday life]. Lisboa: Relógio d’Água.
  249. Goffman, E. (1999). Os momentos e os seus homens [The moments and their men]. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água. Goffman, E. (2007). Manicômios, prisões e conventos [Asylums, prisons and convents]. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva.
  250. Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2017). The local TV station as an organizational self: Promoting corporate image via Instagram. International Journal on Media Management, 19(4),282-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1383255
  251. Halldorsson, V., Thorlindsson, T., & Katovich, M. A. (2017). Teamwork in sport: A sociological analysis. Sport in Society, 20(9), 1281-1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1284798
  252. Hanusch, F. (2017). Political journalists’ corporate and personal identities on Twitter profile pages: A comparative analysis in four Westminster democracies. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1488-1505.
  253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698479
  254. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  255. Leaver, T., & Highfield, T. (2018). Visualising the ends of identity: Pre-birth and post-death on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1259343 Leigh, J. (2017). Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self: Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 612-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.016
  256. Lizardo, O., & Collett, J. L. (2013). Embarrassment and social organization: A multiple identities model. Social Forces, 92(1), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot078
  257. Lyons, A. (2018). Multimodal expression in written digital discourse: The case of kineticons. Journal of Pragmatics, 131, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.001
  258. McMahon, J., McGannon, K. R., & Zehntner, C. (2017). Slim to win: An ethnodrama of three elite swimmers’ “presentationof self” in relation to a dominant cultural ideology. Sociology of Sport Journal, 34(2), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2015-0166
  259. Mueller, F. (2018). Taking Goffman seriously: Developing strategy-as-practice. Critical Perspectives on
  260. Accounting, 53, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.009
  261. Pires, R. P. (2012). O problema da ordem [The issue of order]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 69, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.7458/spp201269785
  262. Plummer, K. (2000). Symbolic interactionism in the twentieth century. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory (2nd ed.) (pp. 193-222). Massachusstts and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  263. Portillo, S., Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., & Nelson, M. (2013). Front-stage stars and backstage producers: The role of judges in problem-solving courts. Victims & Offenders, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.685220
  264. Qi, J., Monod, E., Fang, B., & Deng, S. (2018). Theories of social media: Philosophical foundations. Engineering, 4(1), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.02.009
  265. Richey, M., Gonibeed, A., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2018). The perils and promises of self-disclosure on social media. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9806-7
  266. Salvini, L., Souza, J. de, & Marchi Júnior, W. (2015). Entre fachadas, bastidores e estigmas: Uma análise sociológica do futebol feminino a partir da teoria da ação social de Erving Goffman [Between frontage, backstage and stigmata: A sociological analysis of women’s football based on Erving Goffman’s social action theory]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 29(4), 559-569.
  267. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-55092015000400559
  268. Serpa, S. (2014). O contributo do conceito de instituição total para uma leitura empírica de um contexto educativo [The contribution of the concept of total institution to an empirical reading of an educational context]. Atas do VIII Congresso Português de Sociologia [Proceedings of the VIII Portuguese Congress of
  269. Sociology]. Lisbon: Portuguese Sociology Association. Retrieved from http://www.aps.pt/viii_congresso/VIII_ACTAS/VIII_COM0101.pdf
  270. Thornborrow, J., & Haarman, L. (2012). Backstage activities as frontstage news. European Journal of Communication,27(4), 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112459529
  271. Vigmo, S., & Lantz-Andersson, A. (2014). Language in the wild – Living the carnival in social media. Social Sciences, 3(4), 871-892. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3040871
  272. Walsh, M. J., & Baker, S. A. (2017). The selfie and the transformation of the public-private distinction.
  273. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1185-1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1220969
  274. Werner, A., & Malterud, K. (2016). Children of parents with alcohol problems performing normality: A qualitative interview study about unmet needs for professional support. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30673
  275. Wilkinson, C. (2017). Going “backstage”: Observant participation in research with young people. Children’s Geographies, 15(5), 614-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2017.1290924
  276. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2018). Goffman’s Backstage Revisited: Conceptual Relevance in Contemporary Social Interactions. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(10), 74-80. https://doi:10.11114/ijsss.v6i10.3659.
  277. Ágoas, F. (2013). Narrativas em perspetiva sobre a história da Sociologia em Portugal [Narratives in perspective on the history of Sociology in Portugal]. Análise Social, 206, xlviii (1st.), 221-256.
  278. Alaoui, Y., & Abakouy, M. (2017). L‘identité: De la Sociologie aux sciences sociales [Identity: From Sociology to social sciences]. Barataria. Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales, 22. https://doi.org/10.20932/barataria.v0i22.310
  279. Almeida, A. N. (1999). Uma introdução. Sociologia, sociólogos e práticas profissionais. Percursos de construção da identidade no Portugal democrático [An introduction. Sociology, sociologists and professional practices. Paths of identity construction in democratic Portugal]. In H. Carreiras, F. Freitas, & I. Valente, I. (Eds,). Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist] (pp. 1-10). Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  280. Almeida, J. F. de (1994). Introdução à Sociologia [Introduction to Sociology]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta. Bögenhold, D. (2017). The order of social sciences: Sociology in dialogue with neighbouring disciplines. The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, XI(1), 27-52.
  281. Burawoy, M. (2007). For public Sociology. In A. Abbot et al. (Eds.), Public Sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics & the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 23-64). California, USA: University of California Press.
  282. Butollo, F. (2017). Sociology as science and action. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 42(1), 91-94. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s11614-017-0258-6
  283. Capucha, L. M. A. (1999). O sociólogo na avaliação de projectos, programas e políticas sociais [The sociologist in the evaluation of social projects, programs and policies]. In H. Carreiras, F. Freitas, & I.
  284. Valente, I. (Eds.), Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist] (pp. 165-173). Oeiras: Celta Editora. Caria, T. H., César, F., & Biltes, R. (2012). A profissionalização da Sociologia e o uso dualístico das ciências sociais [The professionalisation of Sciology and the dualistic use of Social Sciences]. Configurações, 9, 15-
  285. https://doi.org/10.4000/configuracoes.1083
  286. Carreiras, H., Freitas, F., & Valente, I. (Eds.) (1999). Profissão sociólogo [Profession sociologist]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  287. Carvalho, T., Correia, T., & Serra, H. (2018). Professions under suspicion: What role for professional ethics and commitment in contemporary societies? Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 88, 9-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7458/SPP20188814795
  288. Castelo, L. P. (2015). Construções identitárias dos sociólogos portugueses: Uma proposta de modelo analítico [Identity constructions of Portuguese sociologists: A proposal for an analytical model]. Sociologia On Line, 9, 133-160.
  289. Costa, A. F. (1988). Cultura profissional dos sociólogos [Professional culture of sociologists]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 5, 107-124.
  290. Cuin, C.-H., & Gresle, F. (1995). História da Sociologia [History of Sociology]. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
  291. Dubar, C. (1997). A socialização. Construção das identidades sociais e profissionais [Socialisation. Construction of social and professional identities]. Porto: Porto Editora.
  292. Egreja, C. (2016). O ensino da Sociologia em cursos superiores de outras áreas de formação: A perspetiva de docentes e diretores [The teaching of Sociology in higher education programmes in other areas of training: The perspective of teachers and directors]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.7458/SPP2016827449
  293. Ferreira, C., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the teaching of Sociology in higher education. Contributions to a discussion. Societies, 7(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030
  294. Gonçalves, C. M. (2007). Análise sociológica das profissões: Principais eixos de desenvolvimento [Sociological analysis of professions: Main axes of development]. Sociologia, Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 17, 177-223.
  295. Gresle, F. (1990). Profissão [Profession]. In R. Boudon, P. Besnard, M. Cherkaoui, & B.-P. Lécuyer (Dirs.), Dicionário de Sociologia [Dictionary of Sociology] (pp. 197-198). Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
  296. Hanemaayer, A. (2019). Symposium itroduction: Challenges for theorizing in the profession of Sociology.
  297. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 56(1), 118-119. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/cars.12233
  298. Javeau, C. (1998). Lições de Sociologia [Lessons of Sociology]. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
  299. Pinto, J. M. (2013). Da Sociologia como profissão à Sociologia crítica. Entrevista com José Madureira Pinto por Renato Miguel do Carmo e Virgílio Borges Pereira [From Sociology as a profession to critical Sociology. Interview with José Madureira Pinto conducted by Renato Miguel do Carmo and Virgílio Borges Pereira]. Análise Social, 208, xlviii (3.º), 685-720.
  300. Neto, H. V. (2013). Principais estádios evolutivos da Sociologia em Portugal [Main evolutionary stages of Sociology in Portugal]. Sociologia, Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, XXVI, 37-59. Sallum Jr., B. (2005). O futuro das ciências sociais. A sociologia em questão [The future of the social sciences. Sociology in question]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 48, 19-26.
  301. Serpa, S. (2018). Ideal type in sociological research. Sociology International Journal, 2(5), 398-399. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00075
  302. Veloso, L., Freire, J., Oliveira, L., & Lopes, N. (2012). Questões deontológicas e de metodologia de investigação em Sociologia: O caso do interesse público e das profissões [Deontological and research methodology issues in Sociology: The case of the public interest and professions]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7458/SPP201269788
  303. Zanatta, M. S. (2011). As teias da identidade: Contribuições para a discussão do conceito de identidade na teoria sociológica [The webs of identity: Contributions to the discussion of the concept of identity in the sociological theory], Perspectiva Erechim, 35(132), 41-54.
    304. This Book Chapter is a republication of Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). The sociologist’s professional identity: Contributions to its analysis. IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, V(14), 632-637. https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.591431
Sociology: Challenges and Reflections
PDF
Published
  • May 01, 2016
Categories
Copyright
  • Copyright (c) 2020 Sandro Serpa
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.