Introduction to Pragmatics: Study Guide

Annie A. Parmis, Sheena Mae P. Lubrio, Jade Barachiel D. Bantasan, Paula Nadrea M. Paquibulan
  • Visayas State University (VSU), Baybay City
  • Abstract:
  • Unit I presents terms related to pragmatics, fallacies, language functions, as well as referential and non-referential uses of language. Unit II focuses on deixis, anaphora, tautology, ambiguity, implicature, presupposition, and entailment.
  1. Bach, Kent (1999). The Myth of Conventional Implicature: Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4). 327-366. Doi:10.1023/A:1005466020243. S2CID 17992433.
  2. Bach, Kent (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In Birner, Betty J; Ward, Gregory, L. (eds.). Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. John Benjamins Publishing: pp.21-30. ISBN: 90-272-3090-0.
  3. Bains, Paul (2006). The Primary of Semiosis: An ontology of relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  4. Bassham, Gregoy (2004). Critical Thinking McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780072879599
  5. Beth, Evert Willem (1955). Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability.
  6. Besnier, Niko. (1990). Language and Affect. Annual Reviews, Inc.
  7. Birner, Betty (2012). Introduction to Pragmatics. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN-978-1405175838
  8. Black, Helen K., Santanello, Holly R., Rubinstein, Robert L. (September 2014). A Pragmatic belief system in family meaning-making after death. Death studies. 38 (8)..: 522-530.
  9.             Doi:10.1080.07481187.2013879754 PMID 24738858 S2CID 22332569
  10. Blackburn, Simon (1996). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. Implicature. ISBN 978-0-198735304.
  11. Blakemore, Diane (1989). Denial and Contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but. Linguistuc and Philosophy, 12: 15-37. Doi:1007/BF00627397 S2CID 62602518
  12. Blakemore, Diane (2000). Indicators and procedures: nevertheless and but. Journal of Linguistics 36(3). 463-486. Doi:10.10167/S0022226700008355.
  13. Braun, David (2016). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Indexicals The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. The Metaphysics Research lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University.
  14. Brown, R., Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity., IN: Sebeok, T.A. (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  15. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Bryman, A. Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, ISBN: 0-19-928498-9, Google Prints, p. 267-268.
  17. Bunnin, Nicholas; Yu, Jiyuan, eds. (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Blackwell. ISBN 979—1-4051-0679-5.
  18. Buring, Daniel (2005). Binding Theory. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-81280-1.
  19. Bush, George W., (2003) State of the Union Address, Janaury 28, 2003.
  20. Bushtaler, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen ed. (2012). Appendix: Glossary of specialist terms for research in quotation.: Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross disciplinary
  21. Busman, H., G. Trauth, and K. Kazzazi (1998). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Taylor and Francis.
  22. Calhaun, Lawrence G., Tedeschi, Richard G., eds. (2006). Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0-0805851960. OCLC 62078275
  23. Carlsen, Mary Baird (1988). Meaning-making: therapeutic processes in adult development. New York: W.W. Norton V& Co. ISBN 978-0393700497. OCLC 17108819.
  24. Caroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic’s Dictionary. John Wiley & Sons. P. 51 ISBN 0-471-27242-6.
  25. Caroll, Robert T. (2013).  Divine fallacy (argument from incredulity). The Skeptic’s Dictionary. Archived from the Original on 10 April 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  26. Carston, Robyn (1998). Implicature, Explicature and Truth-Theoretic Semantics. IN kempson, Ruth (ed). Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 155-282. ISBN: 978-0-521-34251-3.
  27. Carston, Robyn (2002). Thought and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-0631214885.
  28. Carbaugh, Donald (1990). Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact. LEA
  29. Chomsky, N. (1981/1993). Lectures on Government and binding: The Pisa Lectures. Mouton de Gruyter.
  30. Clark, Herbert J. (1996). “Using Language” Cambridge University Press.
  31. Clark, Jef; Clark, Theo (2005) Humbug! The Skeptic’s Field Guide to Spotting Fallacies in Thinking. Nifty Books. ISBN:0-646-44477-8. Retrieved 2016-10-04. Also available as an ebook. Archived 2016-03-06 at the Wayback Machine.
  32. Cole, Peter., Morgan, Jerry L. eds. (1975). Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. Academic press. ISBN 978-0-12-785424-3.
  33. Cole, Peter, ed. (1978). Pragmatics. (Syntax and Semantics, 9). New York: Academic Press.
  34. Cooke, M. (1994). Language and Reason: A Study in HAbermas’s Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  35. Copi, Irving M.; Cohen. Carl (1990). Introduction to Logic (8th ed.). Macmillan: ISBN: 978-0-02-325035-4
  36. Corblin, F. (1996). Quantification et anaphore discursive: la reference aux comple-
  37. Crystal, D. (2008). Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.” 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  38. Curtis, Fallacy Fallacy
  39. Davis, Wayne (2019). Implicature Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  40. Decamp, D. (1972). Hypercorrection and Rule Generalization.
  41. Dunn, Cynthia.(2005) Pragmatic Functions of Humble Forms in Japanese Ceremonial Discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp.218-238.
  42. Duranti, Alessandro (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
  43. Dyregov, Kari Madeleine, Dieserud, Gudrun.,Hjelmeland, Heidi Marie.,  Straiton, Melanie., Rasmussen, Mette Lyberg., Knizek, Birthe Loa., Leenars, Antoon Adrian (September 2011). Meaning-making through psychological autopsy interviews: the value of participating in qualitative research for those bereaved by suicide. Death Studies 35 (8): 685-710. Doi:10.1080/07481187.2011.553310 PMID 24501818 S2CID 35042701.
  44. Earl R. Babbie, (2009). The Practice of Social Research, Cengage Learning. ISBN 0-495-59841-0, google Print. P.258
  45. Epting,  Franz R.., Neimeyer, Robert A., eds. (1984). Personal meaning of death: applications of personal construct theory to clinical practice. Series in death education, aging and health care. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Pub. Corp. ISBN 978-0891163633. OCLC 9557799.
  46. Fantozzi, Victoria B.( June 2012). Making meaning in student teaching. Action in Teacher Education 34(2): 146-158. Doi.10.1080/01626620.2012.677738. S2CID 144447650.
  47. Feinberg, Joel (2007). Psychological Egoism. In Shafer-Landau, Russ (ed.). Ethical Theory. An Anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies. Wiley-Blackwell. p.193. ISBN 978-0-4051-23320-3 Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved  2016.10.04.
  48. Filimonova, Elena (2005). Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 9789027293886 – via Google Books.
  49. Fischer, David Hackett (1970). Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. HarperCollins: ISBN 978-0-06-131545-9
  50. Flew, Anthony (1984). A Dictionary of Philosophy (Revised 2nd ed.). Macmillan ISBN 978-0-312-20923-0. Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2016-10-04.
  51. Foley, William (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An Introduction.. Blackwell Publishing.
  52. Foster, Stephen William (December 2013). What is the Question? Anthropology and Humanism 38 (2): 146-159. Doi:10.1111/anhu.12015.
  53. Frankie, Viktor E. (1962) [1946]. Man’s Search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0807014271. OCLC 68940601.
  54. Frawley, William (1992). Linguistic Semantics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  55. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2007).  An Introduction to Language. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  56. George, Geoff. (2017). Demonstrative and Indexicals. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved:  February 19, 2017.
  57. Gula, Robert J. (2002). Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language. Axios Press. ISBN: 978-0-9753662-6-4. Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2016-10-04.
  58. Greene, Mitchell (2020). Speech Acts. In Zalta, Edward (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philisophy. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
  59. Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. Cole et al. (pp. 41-58). Brill.
  60. Grice H. P. (1975). Logical and conversation (pdf). Cole & Morgan (1975). Reprinted in Grice (1989:22-40). Page numbers refer to the reprint.
  61. Grice, H. Paul (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-85270-9.
  62. Grosz, Barbara, J., Joshi, Aravind K., and Weinstein, Scott (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings, 21st Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. 44-50.
  63. Habermas, Jurgen (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
  64. Haet, Tamarah., Yuenger, Nancy, (2015). California Trial Objections. S8. Questions Is Compound”. Pp. 113-114.
  65. Hanks, William F. (1992). Rethinking Context: an introduction. In Goodwin Charles; Duranti, Alessandro(eds.). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 43-76. Retrieved  February, 19, 2017.
  66. Hazlett, A. (2010). The Myth of Factive Verbs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 80 (3): 497-522. Doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00338.
  67. Hill, Gerald N. (2002). The people’s law dictionary: taking the mystery out of legal language. New York, NY: MJF Books. ISBN: 9781567315530.
  68. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  69. Holtgaves, Thomas; Kraus (Brian (2018). Processing scalar implicatures in conversational contexts: An ERP Study. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 46: 93-108. Doi:10.1016/.j.neurolling.2017.12.008 S2CID: 53156540.
  70. Hornby, A. S. (2010). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (8th ed.) Oxford  [England]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0194799003. “sophist”
  71. Horn, Laurence R. (2004). Implicature. In Horn, Laurence. R.; Ward, Gregory (eds.). The Handbook  of Pragmatics. Wiley-Blackwell. Pp.2-28. Doi.10.1002/9780470756959.ch1. ISBN:978-0631225478.
  72. Hurley, Patrick J., (2007). A Concise Introduction to Logic (10th ed). Cengage. ISBN 978-0-495-50383-5. Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2015-10.04.
  73. Jensen, Arthur R. (1969).  Counter Response. Journal of Social Issues. 25(4): 219-222. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00632.x ISSN 1540-4560.
  74. Johnson, Ralph H., Blair, J. Anthony (1994).  Logical Self-Defense. IDEA: ISBN 978-0-1-932716-11-21, retrieved from 2016-10-04.
  75. Kadmon, Nirit (2001). Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and focus. Great Britain: Wiley-Blackwell, page 10.
  76. Kegan, Robert(1982). The evolving self. Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674272309. OCLC 7672087.
  77. Kibble, R. (1997). Complement anaphora and Dynamic binding. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII. Ed. A. Lawson, 258-275. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  78. Laurence, R. Horn and Gregory Ward. (2005). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell.
  79. Layman, C. Stepen C. (2003). The Power of Logic.p. 158.
  80. Lee, Benjamin (1997). Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage  and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham: Duke University Press. pp. 95-134.
  81. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
  82. Leon, Joseph (2011). Appeal to Probability. Logical and Critical Thinking. Archived from the original, on 27 September 2013.
  83. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0 521 29414 0.
  84. Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.
  85. Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren, Jef; Berruccelli-Papi, Marcella (eds.). The pragmatic Perspective. John Benjamins. Pp. 61-129. ISBN 978-0-1556190117.
  86. Levinson, Stephen (1989). A Review of Relevance. Journal of Linguistics. 25(2): 455-472.
  87. Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MITPress. ISBN: 978-026261304.
  88. Loftus, Elizabeth F., Zannie, Guido (1975). Eyewitness testimony.. The Influence of the wording of a questions. Bulletin of the psychonomic Society. 5 (1) 86-88. Doi: 10.3758.BF03336715.
  89. Lin, G. H. C., & Perkins, L. (2005). Cross-cultural discourse of giving and accepting gifts. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1-2, 103-12 (ERIC Collections in ED 503685 https://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED503685.pdf)
  90. Mackay, Michael M, Bluck, Susan (2010). Meaning-making in memories: A comparison of memories of death-related and low point life experiences. Death Studies: 34(8): 715-737. Doi:10.1080/07481181003761708 PMID 24482847  S2CID 31138533
  91. Mackay, Nigel (2003). Psychotherapy and the idea of meaning. Theory & Psychology. 13 (3): 359-386. Doi:10.1177/0959354303013003004
  92. Malmkjaer, K. Speech-Act Theory. In the Linguistics Encyclopedia, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.
  93. Mary, Haas (1969). Exclusive and inclusive. A look at early usage. International Journal of American Linguistics 35:1-6.
  94. Matthews (2010). Language Contact and Chinese. in Hickey, ed., The Handbook of Language Contact, p. 760.
  95. McCarthy, T. (1984). Reason and the  Rationalization of Society. Theory of Communicative Action. 1.
  96. McDonald, Simon (2009). Appeal to probability. Toolkit for Thinking. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015.
  97. McEnery T. (2000). Corpus-based and computational approaches to discourse anaphora. John Benjamins.
  98. Mey, Jacob L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell (2nd ed.)
  99. Meyerhoff, Miria, (2013). Routledge Sociolinguistics Glossary. Introducing Sociolinguistics, 2nd edition. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 2013-05-12.
  100.  Mezirow, Jack (2009). An overview of transformative learning. in ILleris, Knud (ed.). Contemporary theories of learning: learning theorists – in their own words. London; New York: Routledge. pp. v90-105. ISBN 978-0-4154343439. OCLC 213446282
  101. Merriam, Sharan B., Heuer, Barbara (1996). Meaning-making, adult learning and development: a model with implications for practice. International Journal  of Lifelong Education. 15 (4): 243-255. Doi.10.1080/0260137960150402.
  102. Mortimer, Eduardo Fleury., Scott, Philip H., (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead; Philadelphia: Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335212088. OCLC 53193913.
  103. Nash, Robert J.,  Murray, Michele, C. (2010). Helping College Students find purpose: the campus guide to meaning-making. Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 9780470408148. OCLC 42831779.
  104. Neimeyer, Robert A., Rasin, Jonathan D., eds. (2000).Construction of disorder: meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy. Washington , DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN: 978-1667986290.
  105. Neimeyer, Robert A., ed (2001). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association: ISBN: 978-1557987426. OCLC 44712952.
  106. Nouwen, R. (2003). Complement anaphora and interpretation”. Journal of Semantics, 20, 73-113.
  107. Nordquist, Richard (2021). Tautology (Grammar, Rhetoric,  and Logic). Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/tautology-grammar-rhetoric-and-logic-1692528
  108. Nordquist, Richard (2020, August 28). Conversational Implicature Definition and Examples. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/conversational-implicature-speech-acts-1689922
  109. Nordquist, Richard (2020, August 27). Speech Acts in Linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/sppech-act-linguistics-1692119.
  110. Novac, Joseph . (April 1993) Human Contrsuctivism. A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology. 6(2): 167-193. Doi:10.1080.0v8036039308404338.
  111. Nowen, Rick, Brasoveanu, Adrian, van Eijc, Jan, Visser Albert (2016). Dynamic Semantics. In Zalta, Edward (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  112. Nuccetelli, Susana (editor), Philosophy of Language: The Central Topics.” Gary Seay (Series Editor). Rowman, & Littlefield Publishers, December 24, 2007
  113. Ochs, Elinor (1990). Indexicality and Socialization. In J. Stigler, R. Shweder& G. Herdt (eds.) Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  114. Ochs, Elinot and Shieffelin, Banbi. Language has a heart. Text 9: 7-25.
  115. Pagin, Peter (2016). Assertion. In Zalta Edward(ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia in Philosophy. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
  116. Park, Crystal L. (2010). Making Sense of the meaning Literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life event. Psychological Bulletin. 136 (2): 257-301- doi: 10.1037/10018301 PMID 20192563.
  117. Park, R., Leonard, David P., Goldberg, Steven H., (2011). Evidence Law: A Student’s guide to the Law of Evidence as applied in American Trials. Pp. 80-81.
  118. Patey, Douglas lane (1986). Johnson Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again. Journal of the History of Ideas. 47(1). 139-145. Doi:10.2307/2709600. JSTOR 2709600
  119. Perry, William G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, ISBN: 978-0030813269.OCLC 76870
  120. Peter, H. Russell (2008). Two Cheers for Minority Government: The Evolution of Canadian Parliamentary Democracy. P. 167.
  121.             BE a Freelance Writer. Surayud Chulanont. Global Media. ISBN: 82-89940-33-3 ISBN 978-81-89940-33-1
  122.             Gotcha! Can’t  Politicians Handle Tough Questions?
  123.             With Malice Toward All? Patricia Moy, Michael Pfau. P.43
  124. Pierce, C. S. (1897). [c]. On Signs. MS [R]. 798
  125. Pinker, Steven (2007). The Stuff of thought: language as a window into human nature, penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-670-06327-7 pp.6-9
  126. Pirie, Madsen (2006). How to Win Every Argument. The Use and Abuse of logic: Continuum International publishing Group. ISBN 0-8264-9006-0.
  127. Postman, Neil, Weingartner, Charles (1969). Meaning Making. Teaching a subversive Activity, New York: Delarcorte Press. Pp.82-97 OCLC 4259
  128. Potts, Christopher (2005). Conventional Implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University press.
  129. Ranjit Kumar, Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners, SAGE, 2005, ISBN: 1-4129-1194-X Google Print, p. 136-137.
  130. Rehm, Marsha L. (1999). Vocation as meaning making narrative: Implications for vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education Research. 24 (3): 145-59.
  131. Relative privation. Archived from the original on 2019-11-05. Retrieved  2019-12-30 via Logically Fallacious.
  132. Robinson, Douglas (2006). Introducting Performative Pragmatics. London and New York: Routledge.
  133. Rosen, Hugh, Kuehlwein, Kevin T., eds. (1996). Constructing realities: meaning-making perspectives for psychotherapists. Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0787901950. OCLC 32969007
  134. Salmani, Nodoushan, M.A. (2006). Greetings forms in English and Persian: A sociopragmatic perspective. International Journal of Language, Culture, and Society, 17, online.
  135. Salmani, Nodoushan, M. A. (2008). Which  view of indirect reports do Persian data corroborate? International Review of Pragmatics, 10(1), 76-100.
  136. Sanford, A., L. Moxey and K. Patterson (1994). Psychological studies of quantifiers. Journal of Semantics 11, 153-170.
  137. Sauerland, U. (2007). Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics Pelgrave.
  138. Schmolz, H. 2015. Anaphora Resolution and Text Retrieval. A Linguistic Analysis Hypertexts. De Gruyter.
  139. Sedivy, Julie and Carlson, Grey N. (2011). Sold in Language: How Advertisers Talk to You and What This Says About You, Wiley-Blackwell pp. 104-105.
  140. Sesardic, Neven (2015-10-13). Making Sense of Heritability (1 ed.) Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487378. ISBN 978-0-521-82818-5.
  141. Sifianou, Maria (1999). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford University Press.
  142. Simon, Horst J., (2005). Only you? Philological Investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second person plural (PDF). In Filimonova, Elena (ed.). Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2011-06-09 Retrieved 2010-08-02.
  143. Silverstein, Michael. (1976). Shifters, Linguistic Categories and Cultural Description in Meaning and Anthropology. Albuqueque: University of New Mexico Press. pp. 11-v55. Retrieved  February 13, 2017.
  144. Sperber, Dan., Wlson, Deidre., (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0631198789.
  145. Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (2005).  Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handboo of Contemporary, Philosophy. OUP, Oxford, 468-501.
  146. Stalnaker, Robert (1978). Assertion. In Cole P. (ed.). Syntax and Semantics, Vol. IX: Pragmatics. Academic Press.
  147. Stein, Catherine H., Abrahan, Kristen M., Bonar Erin E., McAuliffe, Christine E., Fogo, Wendy R., Faigin, David A., Raiya Hisham Abu., Potokar, Danielle, N., (2009). Making meaning from personal loss: religious, benefit finding, and goal-oriented attributions. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 14(2). 83-100. Doi:10.1080/15325020802173819 S2CID 145124262
  148. Straker, David.. Conjuction Fallacy Changingminds.orh. Archived from the original of 2011-08-13. Retrieved 2011-02-01.
  149. Strand, Paul S., Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne., Barnes-Holmes, Dermot (2003). Educating the whole child: Implication of behaviorism  as a science of meaning. Journal of Behavioral Education. 12(2): 105-117. Doi:10.1023/A:1023833619332. JSTOR 41824299.
  150. Terry, J. Fadem (2008). The Art of Asking: Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers. FT Press, 2008 ISBN 0-13-71442405 Google print, p. 188.
  151.             Response bvias Archieved 2010-02-13 at the Wayback Machine, supersurvey, Ipathia Inc,.
  152. Thibault, Paul J., (2003). Contextualization and social meaning-making practices. In Eerdmans, Susan; Prevignano, Carlol Thibault, Paul j. (eds). Language and interaction: discussions with John J, Gumppersz. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 41-62. ISBN 978-9027225948. OCLCV 50280030.
  153. Thomas, Jenny (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman.
  154. Thomas, Margaret (2011). Fifty key Thinkers on Language and Linguistics. Routhledge. P. 280 ISBN 978-0-415-37302-9. Retrieved 2013-05-12.
  155. Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at work. John Benjamins.
  156. Turkel, Bruce (2016).  All About Them: Grow Your Business by Focusing  on others. Da Capo Press. ISBNL 9780738219202 – via Google Books.
  157. VanderMey, Randall et al (2011). Comp, p.183. excerpt: Bare assertion. The most basic way to distort an issue is to deny that it exists. This fallacy claims, That’s just how it is.
  158. Verschueren, Jef (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York: Arnold Publishers.
  159. Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostrman, Jan Blommaert, eds. (1995). Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  160. Von Fintel, Kai (1999). NPI-Licensing, Strawson-Entailment, and Context Dependency. Journal of Semantics (16): 97-148.
  161. Walton, D. (1996). A Pragmatic Synthesis. In: Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity. Applied Logic Seried vol. 1. Springer, Dordrecht.
  162. Walton, Douglas, N. (1999). The Fallacy of many questions; on the notions of complexity, loadedness and unfair entrapment in interrogative theory. (PDF) Argumentation. 13 (4): 379-383. Doi:10.1023/A1007727929716 S2CID 141v720470. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2018-12-21. Retrieved  2020-04-25.
  163. Walton, Douglas (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-511-40878-6.
  164. Wadhaugh, Ronald (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Blacwell.
  165. Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin and Don D, Jackson  (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.
  166. Webster, Jeffrey Dean, Deng, Xiaolei Charlie (May 2015). Paths from Trauma to intrapersonal strength: worldview, posstraumatic growth and wisdom. Journal of Loss and Trauma 20 (3): 253-266. Doi: 10.1080/15325024.2014.932207. S2CID 145464421.
  167. Wickman, Pre-Olof (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: learning and meaning-making as situated  talk and action: Teaching and learning in science series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 978-0805855036. OCLC 58563560
  168.  Wierzbicka, Anna (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  169. Whitney, William Dwight (1906). Ipse dixit. The Century dictionary and cyclopedia, pp. 379-380; Westbrook, Robert B. John Dewey and American Democracy. P. 359 Archived 2020-12-04 at the  Wayback Machine.
  170. Whitley, M. Stanley (2002). Spanish-English Contrasts: A Course in Spanish linguistics. Georgetown Universitypress. P. 358. ISBN 978-0-87840-381-3. Retrieved 12 May 2013.
  171. Wilson, Deirdre, Sperber, Dan (1981). Werth, Paul (ed). On Grice’s Theory of Conversation. Conversation and Discourse. Croom Helm. Pp. 155-178. ISBN: 9780709927174.
  172. Wilson, Deirdre., Sperber, Dan (2002). Relevance Theory.UCL Psychology and Language Sciences. Retrieved 22 bJanaury 2019.
  173. Yildirim, Savas & Kilicaslan, Yilmaz & ERman Aykac, R. (204). A Computational Model for Anaphora Resolution in Turkish via Centering Theory: an Initial Approach: 124-128.
  174. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.worldcat.org>title>oclc
  175. Yule, George (1996). Pragmatics (Oxford Introductions to Language Study). Oxford University Press.
  176. https://www.encyclopedia.com Entailment, Presupposition, and Implicature
  177. https://downlkoad.atlants-press.com Presupposition and Entailment Yuanli Fan – Atlantis Press
  178. https://examples.yourdictionary.com Example of Tautology: Meaning and Common Forms
  179. http://www.sjsu.edu Love is a Fallacy by Max Shulman
  180. https://www. Northiowa.org Love is a Fallacy North Iowa Community School
  181. https://ecampusontario.pressnbooks.pub 10.5 Pragmatics and the Cooperative Principle
  182. http://web.mit.edu Situated Inference versus Conversational Implicature
  183. https://repo.iain.tulungagung.ac.id Chapter I Introduction
  184. https://www.ello.uos.de Pragmatics
  185. https://psychology.fandom.com Pragmatics/Psychology Wiki/Fandom
  186. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com Browse In Pragmatics, Linguistics – Oxford Handbooks Online
  187. http://blake.ppls.ed.ac.uk Presupposition – The University of Edinburgh
  188. http://blake.ppls.ed.ac.uk  Truth conditions & Entailment
  189. https://iask.net entailments, presuppositions an implicatures: A semantico
  190. https://en.m.wikipedia.org Presupposition – Wikipedia
  191. http:/www.sfu.ca Some Terminology and Issue with Presuppositions
  192. https://askinglot.com What is Implicature semantics?
  193. https://www.funtrivia.comAmbigous Word Quiz/Language Use/ 10 Questions
  194. https://www.proprofs.com What do you think you know about ambiguity and Vagueness in Cognitive
  195. https://www.sporcle.com All ambiguous Trivia Quizzes and Games – Sporcle
  196. https://en.m.wikipedia.org Pragmatics
  197. https://study.com What is Pragmatics? Definition & Examples – Video & Lesson
  198. https://en.m.wikipedia.org Implicature – Wikipedia
  199. https://www.sciencedirect.com Implicature – An Overview/ Science Direct Topics
  200. https://sebac.org.br Importance of pragmatics in linguistics – Sebac
  201. https://www.proprofs.com Pragmatics (Linguistics) Knowledge Quiz! – Proprofs
  202. https://www.amazon.com Pragmatics (Cambridge  Textbooks in Linguistics) Kindle edition
  203. https://www.thoughtco.com Conversational Implicature Definition and Examples
  204. https://ielanguages.com What is Pragmatics? – Introduction to Linguistics
  205. https://www.uni-due.de Linguistic Glossary – Uni-Due
  206. https://www.worldcat.org Citation Styles for “An Introduction to Language”
  207. https://www.funtrivia.com Can you Spot the Fallacy? Trivia Quiz/Humanities/10 Questionns
  208. https://www.funtrivia.com Find the Fallacies:  Fallacies of Relevance Quiz – Fun Trivia
  209. https://www.proprofs.com The Fallacy Game! Interesting Trivia Questions Quiz – Proprofs
  210. https://www.frankieroberto.com A toothbrush is a toothbrush – Frankie Roberto
  211. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp Contextualizing tautologies : from radical pragmatics
  212. https://ultius.com Entailment/Linguistics/Glossary/Ultius
  213. https://www.britannica.com language/definition, types, characteristics, development
  214. https://philpapers.org Presupposition – Bibliography Phil Papers
  215. https://pediaa.com Difference Between Semantics  and Pragmatics
  216. https://libguides.reed.edu Semiotics & Pragmatics – Linguistics
  217. https://www.proprofs.com The Fallacy Game! Interesting Trivia Question Quiz – Proprofs
  218. https://www.sporcle.com All Fallacy Trivia Quizzes and Game
  219. https://www.cousehero.com L4 Can you spot the fallacy?
  220. https://tautology.fandom.com Pragmatics/Tautology
  221. https://files.eric.ed.gov Boys are Boys: A Contrastive Study of Nominal Tautology Between L1
  222. https://www.differencebetween.com Difference Between entailment and Presupposition/Compare
  223. https://www.sciencedirect.com Presupposition – An Overview
  224. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr Vagueness, Presupposition and truth – value judgements.
  225. https://literary.devices.net Definition and Examples of Tautology in Literature
  226. http://www.ello.uos.de Tautologies: Add.meaning – ELLO
  227. https://benjamins.com Tautology as presumptive meaning
  228. https://wals.info/chapter/39 World Atlas of Language Structures 39: Inclusive/Exclusive  Distinction in Independent Pronouns
  229. https://wals.info/chapter/40: Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction in Verbal Inflection
  230. https://www.thoughtco.com Tautology (Grammar, Rhetoric and Logic)
  231. http://www.ccsenet.org Pragmatic Functions of Presupposition in Advertising
  232. https://www.differencebetween.com Difference Between Entailment and Presupposition
  233. https://examples.yourdictionary.com Examples of Fallacies in Everyday Life
  234. https://tautology.fandom.com Pragmatics
  235. https://benjamins.com Tautology as presumptive meaning
  236. https://examples.yourdictionary.com Examples of Euphemism: 80+ Common Phrases
  237. https://en.m.wikipedia.org Speech Act
  238. https://www.thoughtco.com Speech Acts in Linguistics
  239. https://www.thoughtco.com Speech Act Theory: Definition and Examples
  240. https://en.m.wikipedia.org leading Question
  241. https://www.formpl.us Leading Questions: Definitions, Types, and Examples
  242. http://grammar.ucsd.edu Leading Questions
  243. https://mobiecultists.com What Is directive speech act example?
  244. https://www.wtamu.edu Speech Act Theory
  245. http://www.scun.edu Locution. Illocution and Perlocution
  246. https://www.ipsos.com Ipsos Encyclopedia
  247. https://knowledge.mbalifecycle.com What Is double-barreled question?
  248. https://methods.sagepub.com Double-Barreled Question
  249. https://pragmatics.indiana.edu Pragmatics & Discourse at IU: Indiana University Bloomington
  250. https://moviecultists.com In linguistic what is presupposition?
  251. Https://excellence-in-literature.com Figure of Speech: Schemes and Tropes
  252. https://www.funtrivia.com Can you spot the fallacy?
  253. https://funtrivia.com Find the Fallacies
  254. https://www.proprofs.com The Fallacy Game
  255. https://www.lexico.com Trope Meaning & Definition for UK English
  256. https://examples.yourdictionary.com  Examples of Tropes and their meaning
  257. https://www.oxfordlearners.dictionaries.com
  258. https://www.proprofs.com Pragmatics
  259. https://www.proprofs.com 17 Linguistics Quizzes Online, Trivia, Questions & Answers
  260. https://agileforall.com 20 Common Logical Fallacies
  261. https://www.coursehero.com Unit 11 Course Hero
  262. https://www.ultius.com Entailment/Linguistics
EB-278 Title
PDF
Published
  • April 15, 2022
Categories
Copyright
  • Copyright (c) 2022 ‪A. Parmis, P. Lubrio, D. Bantasan, M. Paquibulan
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.