Funding and Academic Performance in Universal Primary Education Schools in Aboke Subcounty Kole District, Uganda

Apio Sarah Okite
  • Gulu University, Uganda
  • Keywords:
  • Education Strategic, Academic Performance, Ethical Considerations, Syllabus Coverage
  • Abstract:
  • Study findings on the effects of education funding on student performance have been inconsistent. Some have indicated that it is how money is spent and not how much is available that determine academic outcomes. In Uganda, poor performance of Universal Primary Education (UPE) schools has partly been blamed on ineffectively utilization of UPE funds disbursed by government. This study aimed at establishing the relationship between funding and academic performance of such schools in Aboke sub-county, Kole District, northern Uganda. A cross-sectional study design was adopted where both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used. Six schools out of 13 and a total of 165 respondents were sampled purposively or randomly to constitute study samples. Questionnaire, interview and documentary review methods were used to collect primary and secondary data. Tool validity was ensured through pre-testing while reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha test of reliability. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) while content analysis was used for the qualitative data. A total of 85.7% agreed on the availability of instructional materials. The role of the SMC in academic performance was established as not being clear (48.7%) while on average, majority of the respondents (53.5%) supported the statements about PTA. The Pearson Correlation findings indicate positive strong and statistically significant relationships between the size of financial disbursement and academic performance; timing of disbursement and academic performance; accountability and academic performance; and between accountability and funding. The regression analysis indicated that the funds size, disbursement timing and funds utilization have a significant combined effect on academic performance of UPE schools. It was concluded that low level of funding leads to poor performance of schools and that the size of funding greatly affects the academic performance compared to the timing of disbursement. It was recommended that the Government should improve UPE funding so as to improve academic performance of UPE schools.
  1. Ablo, E. and Reinikka, R. (2012). Do Budgets Really Matter? Evidence from Public spending on Education and health in Uganda. Washington, D.C: World Bank Report.
  2. Ahamed, R. (2009). Corporate policy: Values and social responsibility. Journal of Management.
  3. Alexander, L. and Simmons, J. (2005). The Determinants of School Achievement in developin countries: the Educational production Function. Washington, D.C; IBRD staff. Working paper No.201, IBRD.
  4. Benson and O’Hallaran (2007). Tackling low educational achievement. York: The Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  5. Charles A. Dana, A Centre (2010). Resource allocation practices and student achievement (December 4th 2000 ed.): South west Education Development Laboratory Texas.
  6. Chaudhury and Hammer (2014) Provider Absence in Schools and Health Clinics: Northest Universities Development Consortium conference.
  7. Chimombo, J. P. G. (2005). ‘Quantity versus quality in education: Case studies in Malawi’. International Review of Education, 51, 155-172.
  8. David M. Van Slyke, (2013). Agency Theory and Beyond: Contracted Providers’ Motivations to properly used service monitoring tools, Journal of public Administration 19(20:207-227
  9. Evernest, G. (2010), Financial disclosure by accountable organizations of central governments, Journal of public sector accounting, 16(6), 505-501
  10. Ferrer (2009). Decentralization in Indonesia, International Journal for decision makers, Journal of public sector evaluation, 18(1)
  11. Frost, D and More A. (2010). Gaining competitive advantage through Competence Development. Journal of management development; Volume 02 issue1.
  12. Gauntam, M. (2009), Using models as tools in education and training, Wallingford UK, Pretence hall.
  13. Glewwe, Paul, Naumann Ilias, and Michael Kremer, (2014). “Teacher Incentives.”National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper 9671
  14. Hanson, G. (2010). The reason of rules; constitutional political economy, Cambridge University Evans Publishers
  15. Hanushek, E.A (2013). ‘The failure of input-based schooling policies’ The Economic Journal 113, 64-98.
  16. Hazel,(2010). The new public management; Improving research and policy dialogue, Journal of public management, PP 12
  17. Herman. T. (2010), Responsible regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate, Journal of Management Science, PP4
  18. J.C Munene, (2009). The management of Universal Primary Education in Uganda: Organization for social science research in Eastern and Southern Africa PP1-36
  19. Kaplan, N. (2010), Financial reporting in public sector focusing in value for money, Oxford University Press.
  20. Kasirye, I. (2009), Determinants of learning achievement in Uganda: Economic policy Research centre Makerere University.
  21. Kinyera, G.A.(2009). Teachers’ work experience and pupils’ schooling experiences determinants of achievement in primary schools Kampala: Uganda National Examination Board.
  22. Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES), (2008). Guidelines on policy, roles and Responsibilities of stakeholders in implementation of Universal Primary Education (UPE), Monitor Newspaper Publication Limited, a nation media group company, Kampala
  23. Mullins, R.(2010). Establishing value for money in public sector service delivery. Journal Of Management,PP12
  24. Mushemea Elijjah Dickens, (2003), Financial management of Education in Decentralized Setting: the case of Uganda.
  25. Okidi A. John and Guloba Madina 2006, Decentralization.
  26. Nannyonjo, H. (2007) Education inputs in Uganda. In Africa Human development Group (Vol.WP/98). Washington DC: World Bank
  27. Neter, S. (2010). Changes in the public sector. A review of recent alternative accounting Research, Journal of accounting, auditing and accountability PP3-11New Vision Newspaper, The new Vision printing and Publication Company limited, Kampala
  28. Nishimura, M., Yamano, T. and Saaoka, Y. (2008). ‘Impacts of the Universal Primary Education policy on Education Attainment and private Costs in rural Uganda in rural Uganda”. Journal of Education, 29,161-175.
  29. Nzabona, I. (2010). Accountability in public sector of Rwanda, paper presentation, Kigali.
  30. Peter.O. Ikoya, (2008). Centralization and Decentralization of school’s facilities Management in Nigeria: Journal of Educational Administration.
  31. Smith, P.C and Street, A. (2006). Analysis of secondary Education Efficiency. London: Spending on Education and Health in Uganda. Washington, D.C: World Bank
  32. Roudel, F(2010). Decentralization, enablement and local governance in low income Countries, Environment and planning, Journal of public sector, PP31
  33. The constitution of the Republic of Uganda (2005). The Education and Sports Annual performance report (ESAPR), Ministry of Education Sports 2008/2009
  34. The Local Government Act 1997, and Local Government’s Amendments Act, 1997.
  35.  
Funding and Academic Performance in Universal Primary Education Schools in Aboke Subcounty Kole District, Uganda
PDF
Published
  • April 1, 2021
Categories
Copyright
  • Copyright (c) 2021 ‪Apio Sarah Okite
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.