Similarity Deviation of Diameter and Thickness Effects

Authors

  • Yehuda Partom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11599

Abstract

One way to characterize the similarity of detonations (in the sense of their reaction rate) is through size effect tests. Using cylinders (rods), they’re called diameter effect tests, and using slabs, they’re called thickness effect tests. From the steady state equations of motion of these configurations it follows that they scale as r(D)=h(D), where r=rod radius, h=slab thickness, and D=steady detonation velocity. But tests show deviations from such scaling. Here we propose an explanation to these deviations. The explanation is based on a previous work in which we show that a boundary layer of partial reaction usually forms when a detonation wave is grazing along a free boundary. We suggest and show via computer simulations that those scaling deviations are related to this partially reacted boundary layer effect.

References

S.I. Jackson and M. Short, Experimental measurement of the scaling of the diameter and thickness curves for ideal, and non-ideal explosives, 18th APS-SCCM and 24th AIRAPT conference, J. of Phys. Conference series 500 052020 (2014).

Y. Partom, On the partially reacted boundary layer in rate sticks, SCCM conference (2013).

Y. Partom, Understanding scaling deviations of diameter and thickness effects, ESHP, Beijing China, 25-28 Sept, (2016). th

Y. Partom, A Void Collapse Model for Shock Initiation, 7 Symposium on

Detonation, 506-522 (1981).

Y. Partom, Hydro-Reactive Computations with Temperature Dependent Reaction Rate, SCCM, 460-463 (2001). th

Y. Partom, A Threshold Criterion for Impact Ignition, 12 Symposium on Detonation, 831-834 (2002).

F. Ree, J. Viecelli and J. Glosili, Modeling the kinetics of carbon coagulation in explosives detonation, Chem. J. of Comp.-aided Materials Design (1998).

Downloads

Published

2022-01-23

How to Cite

Partom, Y. (2022). Similarity Deviation of Diameter and Thickness Effects. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11599

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>