Dynamic Response of Ductile Materials from Split Hopkinson Tension Bar Tests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.116.15700Abstract
We use a SHTB (= Split Hopkinson Tension Bar) system to test the response of aluminum 6061-T651 samples under dynamic tension, and to calibrate a strength model for them. Interpretation of SHTB tests cannot be done with the so-called classical analysis, because: 1) the samples are long (relative to compression samples) and are not in dynamic equilibrium; 2) a neck is usually formed towards the end of the test; and 3) the strain to failure is quite high (around 50%). We therefore interpret the tests (calibrating from them a strength model and validating it), using computer simulations of the entire test system. Our entire system simulations are able to reproduce with good fidelity: 1) the response of the SHTB gauges on the two bars; 2) the time evolution, shape and location of the neck; and 3) the strain to failure measured after the test.
References
Kolsky H (1949), An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading, Proc Phys Soc B 62:676-700.
Bertholf LD, Karnes CH (1975) Two-dimensional analysis of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar system, J Mech Phys Solids 23:1-19.
Lindholm US, Bessey RL, Smith GV (1971) Effect of Strain Rate on Yield Strength, Tensile Strength, and Elongation of Three Aluminum Alloys, J Mater 6:119-133.
Nicholas T (1981) Tensile Testing of Materials at High Rates of Strain, Exp Mech 62:177-185.
Staab GH, Gilat A (1991) A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain rate testing, Exp Mech 313:232-235.
Nemat-Nasser S, Isaacs JB, Starrett JE (1991) Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments, Proc R Soc Lond A 435:371-391.
Rodríguez J, Navarro C, Sánchez-Gálvez V (1994) Numerical assessment of the dynamic tension test using the Split Hopkinson Bar, J Test Eval 22:335-342.
Gilat A, Schmidt TE, Walker AL (2009) Full Field Strain Measurement in Compression and Tensile Split Hopkinson Bar Experiments, Exp Mech 49:291-302.
Besnard G, Hild F, Lagrange JM, Martinuzzi P, Roux S (2012) Analysis of necking in high-speed experiments by stereo correlation, Int J Impact Eng 49:179-191.
Rajendran AM, Bless SJ (1986) Determination of tensile flow stress beyond necking at very high strain rate, Exp Mech 26:319-323.
Bridgman PW (1994) The stress distribution at the neck of a tension specimen, Trans ASM 32:553-574.
Rotbaum Y, Rittel D (2014) Is there an optimal gauge length for dynamic tensile specimens? Exp Mech 54:1205-1214.
Mirone G (2013) The dynamic effect of necking in Hopkinson bar tension tests, Mech Mater 58:84-96.
von Karman T, Duwez P (1950) The Propagation of Plastic Deformation in Solids, J Appl Phys 21:987-994.
Osovski S, Rittel D, Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Zaera R (2013) Dynamic tensile necking: influence of specimen geometry and boundary conditions, Mech Mater 62:1-13.
Rittel D, Rotbaum Y, Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Sory D, Zaera R (2014) Dynamic necking of notched tensile bars: an experimental study, Exp Mech 54:1099-1109.
Vaz-Romero A, Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Arias A (2015) The deterministic nature of the fracture location in the dynamic tensile testing of steel sheets, Int J Impact Eng 86:318-335.
Gerlach R, Kettenbeil C, Petrinic N (2012), A new split Hopkinson tensile bar design, Int J Impact Eng 50:63-67.
Avinadav C, Ashuach Y, Kreif R (2011) Interferometry-based Kolsky bar Apparatus, Rev Sci Instrum 82 073908.
Firstenberg O, Ashuach Y, Partom Y (2006) A simple model for dynamic shear failure of stainless steel, Proc th 8 Int Conf Mech Phys Behavior Mater Under Dynamic Loading, Dijon, France, J Phys IV 134:191-196.
Lovinger Z, Ashuach Y, Firstenberg O (2009) Measuring dynamic strength at low plastic strains using a hatshaped specimen, Proc 9th Int Conf Mech Phys Behavior Mater Under Dynamic Loading, Brussels, Belgium, DYMAT 1649-1655.
Lovinger Z, Rikanati A, Rosenberg Z, Rittel D (2011) Electro-magnetic collapse of thick-walled cylinders to investigate spontaneous shear localization, Int J Impact Eng 38:918-929.
Wilkins ML (1964), Calculation of elastic-plastic flow, In: Alder B, Fernbach S, Rotenberg M (Eds) Methods in computational physics, vol. 3, Academic Press pp 211-263.
Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983), A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, Proc 7th Int Symp Ballist, The Hague, Netherlands.
Glema A, Łodygowsky T, Perzyna P (2000) Interaction of deformation waves and localization phenomena in inelastic solids, Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 183:123-140.
Partom, Y, Lindenfeld A (2017) 20th Shock compression of condensed matter Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. 1979, 070023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yehuda Partom, A. Lindenfeld
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
