Empirical Validation of “G-D’s Physics’” “UNCIARE Critical Prediction” Discards “Dark-Matter” as “Superfluous”!

Authors

  • Jehonathan Bentovish

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.111.13818

Abstract

Despite numerous experimental efforts to “detect” the presence of “Dark-Matter” (DM) over the past two decade (assumed to comprise up to 95% of all the mass in the universe), no direct experimental evidence of DM has been found to date. But, without the existence of “dark-matter” the accelerated rate of the universe’s expansion cannot be explained? Fortunately, a new alternative “G-D’s Physics” (previously termed: the “Computational Unified Field Theory”) was discovered that offers an alternative explanation for the accelerated expansion of the universe – while discarding “dark-matter” as “superfluous” (i.e., non-existent”). Based on direct empirical validation of two unique “Critical Predictions” of the “G-D’s Physics”, as more valid than the corresponding predictions of both General Relativity Theory (GRT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) the” G-D’s Physics” is accepted as the new satisfactory Physics Paradigm for 21st century Theoretical Physics; Specifically, empirical validation of the “G-D’s Physics” “Universe’s Non-Continuous Increase in its Accelerated Rate of Expansion (UNCIARE) “Critical Prediction” as evidenced by the “Astronomical-Cosmological Gap in the Universe’s Accelerated Rate of Expansion” (ACGUARE) negates the possibility of the existence of “dark-matter”. The (purely hypothetical) existence of DM is further negated based on the G-D’s Physics “Computational Duality Principle” Theoretical Postulate, which points at the G-D’s Physics singular higher-ordered “Universal Computational Principle” (UCP) that simultaneously computes every exhaustive spatial pixel in the universe at the incredible rate of “c2/h” = 1.36-50 (sec’)! The new G-D’s Physics Paradigm is also shown to resolve the apparent “theoretical inconsistency” between GRT & QM and completely unify between the four basic physical features of “space”,” time”, “energy” & “mass”, based on a newly discovered “Universal Computational Formula” (UCP).

References

Bentwich, J. (2012a) “Harmonizing Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory”. Theoretical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics, Intech (ISBN 979-953-307-377-3), Chapter 22, pp. 515-550. 247

Bentwich, J. (2012b) “Theoretical Validation of the Computational Unified Field Theory”. Theoretical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics, (ISBN 979-953-307-3773), Chapter 23, pp. 551-598.

Bentwich, J. (2013b). “The Theoretical Ramifications of the Computational Unified Field Theory”. Advances in Quantum Mechanics (ISBN 978-953-51-1089-7), Chapter 28, pp. 671-882.

Bentwich, J. (2015). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s PHYSICS): A Candidate 'Theory of Everything'. Selected Topics in Application of Quantum Mechanics (ISBN 978-953-51-2126-8) Chapter 6.

Bentwich, J. (2016) The ‘Computational Unified Field Theory’: A Paradigmatic Shift. Research & Reviews: Journal of Pure & Applied Physics.

Bentwich, J. (2017b) The Computational Unified Field Theory: Explaining the Universe from “Without”. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017c). The Computational Unified Field Theory: A New ‘A-Causal Computation’ Physics. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017d). The ‘Computational Unified Field Theory’ (G-D’s Physics) May Challenge the ‘Big-Bang Theory’. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017f). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics): Time "Reversal" May be Possible. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017g). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics) Transcends Relativity’s Speed of Light Constraint. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics, Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017h). The Computational Unified Field Theory’s New Physics: Transcending Space, Time and Causality. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017i). A “Supra-Spatial-Temporal Universal Consciousness Reality’. Research & Reviews: Journal of Pure & Applied Physics, Special Issue: The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics)- A Paradigmatic Shift in 21 Century Physics.

Bentwich, J. (2017j). A New Science: An Infinite Omniscient Dynamic-Equilibrium Universal Consciousness Reality. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017k). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics) Challenges Darwin’s ‘Natural Selection Principle’! SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017l). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics) Challenges the Second Law of Thermodynamics. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017m). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics): An Empirical & Mathematical Validation of the 'Computational Unified Field Theory'; SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2017n). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-Ds Physics) New Science; SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2018b). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics): What is "Time"? The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 18 (8-A), Special Issue. Bentovish, J. (2023). Empirical Validation of “G-D’s Physics’” “UNCIARE Critical Prediction” Discards “Dark-Matter” as “Superfluous”! European

Bentwich, J. (2018c). The Universal Consciousness Reality's Camouflage: The Physical Universe! The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 18 (8-A), Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2018d). The Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics) Epilogue: Can Human Consciousness Affect the Cosmos? The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 18 (8-A), Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2019c). A Call for Cosmologists & Experimental Physicists: Empirical Validation of the 'Computational Unified Field Theory' (G-D’s Physics) New Paradigm through "Time-Sensitive" Astronomical and Subatomic Measurements. The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 19 (6), Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2019d). The 'Computational Unified Field Theory' (G-D’s Physics): Redefining Mass, Gravity & the Physical Universe. The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 19 (6), Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2019d). Astronomical Validation of the Computational Unified Field Theory (G-D’s Physics) "Critical Prediction" & Resolution of the "Universe's Accelerated Expansion Rate Enigma" (UAERE).The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Vol. 19 (6), Special Issue.

Bentwich, J. (2019e) Urgent Call for Empirical Validation of the Computational Unified Field Theory’s (G-D’s Physics) New 21st Century ‘A-Causal Computation’ (ACC) Paradigm. Acta Scientific Applied Physics, Volume 1(1).

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2020b). An Urgent Need for "G-D’s Physics" New 21 Century Paradigm's Empirical Validation. Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics. Volume 3 (2), p. 59-65.

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021). "G-D’s Physics”: A New Scientific Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century. iUniverse. ISBN 9781532090370.

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021c). "G-D’s Physics": On the True Nature of “Dark-Energy” & "Dark-Matter". In World Journal of Pharmaceutical & Medical Research, Special Issue: "G-D’s Physics” New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications (In Press).

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021g). "G-D’s Physics" New 21 Century Paradigm: A Complete Integration of "Space" & "Energy", "Mass" & "Time"! In World Journal of Pharmaceutical & Medical Research, Special Issue: "G-D’s Physics” New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications (In Press).

Dahia, F.; Lemos, A.S. (2016). "Is the proton radius puzzle evidence of extra dimensions?". European Physical Journal. 76 (8): 435. arXiv:1509.08735. Bibcode:2016EPJC...76..435D. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4266-7. S2CID 118672005

Karr, J.; Hilico, L. (2012). "Why three-body physics does not solve the proton-radius puzzle". Physical Review Letters. 109 (10): 103401. arXiv:1205.0633. Bibcode:2012PhRvL.109j3401K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.103401. PMID 23005286. S2CID 12752418

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press. pp. 172. LCCN 62019621

Lestone, J.P. (4 October 2017). Muonic atom Lamb shift via simple means (Report). Los Alamos Report. Los Alamos National Laboratory. LA-UR-17-29148.

Liu Y, McKeen D, Miller GA (2016). "Electrophobic Scalar Boson and Muonic Puzzles". Physical Review Letters. 117 (10): 101801. arXiv:1605.04612. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.117j1801L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.101801. PMID 27636468. S2CID 20961 249

Onofrio, R. (2013). "Proton radius puzzle and quantum gravity at the Fermi scale". EPL. 104 (2): 20002. arXiv:1312.3469. Bibcode:2013EL....10420002O. doi:10.1209/0295 5075/104/20002. S2CID 119243594

Pohl R, Antognini A, Nez F, Amaro FD, Biraben F, et al. (July 2010). "The size of the proton" (PDF). Nature. 466 (7303): 213–216. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..213P. doi:10.1038/nature09250. PMID 20613837. S2CID 4424731.

Pohl R, et al. (2016a). "Laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium". Science. 353 (6300): 669–673. Bibcode:2016Sci...353..669P. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2468. hdl:10316/80061. PMID 27516595. S2 CID 206647315.

Pohl R, et al. (16 September 2016b) "Proton-radius puzzle deepens". CERN Courier. After our first study came out in 2010, I was afraid some veteran physicist would get in touch with us and point out our great blunder. But the years have passed, and so far nothing of the kind has happened.

Zyga, Lisa (November 26, 2013). "Proton radius puzzle may be solved by quantum gravity". Phys.org. Retrieved September 2,2016.

Riess A. G., Casertano S., Yuan W. et al (2018a). Is there any measurable redshift dependence on the SN Ia absolute magnitude? ApJ 861 126

Shajib A. J., Birrer S., Treu T. et al (2020). STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354. MNRAS 494 6072

Scolnic D., Rest A., Riess A. et al (2014). Systematic Uncertainties Associated with the Cosmological Analysis of the First PAN-STARRS1 Type 1a Supernova Sample. ApJ 795 45

Wong K. C., Suyu S. H., Chen G. C. F. et al (2020). H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late- Universe probes. MNRAS 498 1420

Bolton, J.S., Caputo, A., Liu, M. & Viel, M. (2022). Comparison of Low-Redshift Lyman-α Forest Observations to Hydrodynamical Simulations with Dark Photon Dark Matter. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.21110.

Moskowitz, C. (2021). Dark Matter's Last Stand. Scientific American 324, 4, 64-71 (April 2021) doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-64

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Bentovish, J. . (2023). Empirical Validation of “G-D’s Physics’” “UNCIARE Critical Prediction” Discards “Dark-Matter” as “Superfluous”!. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(1), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.111.13818