G-D’s Physics”: On the True Nature, Elegance & Purpose of the Universe!

Authors

  • Jehonathan Bentovish

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.111.13877

Abstract

Twenty-first century Theoretical Physics has undergone a major “Paradigmatic-Shift” from the Old “Material-Causal” Paradigm of GRT & QM to the New “G-D’s Physics” Scientific Paradigm pointing at the existence of a singular higher-ordered “Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle” (UCP) that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe at the incredible rate of “c2/h” = 1.36-50 sec’(!), thereby producing an extremely rapid series of “Universal-Frames” (UF’s) of the whole physical universe at any “minimal time point”! Two unique “Critical Predictions” of this New “G-D’s Physics” Paradigm have been empirically validated as “more valid” than the corresponding predictions of both GRT & QM, thereby establishing it as the New Scientific Paradigm for 21st Century Physics! Indeed, this New “G-D’s Physics” Scientific Paradigm was shown successful not only in being able to unify between GRT & QM but also (for the first time in Physics) between the four basic physical features of “space”, “energy”, “mass” and “time” based on this singular higher UCP! Accordingly, “G-D’s Physics” postulation of the UCP’s “Ten Hierarchical Computational Dimensions” (THCD’s) that have “preplanned” the whole creation and development of the entire physical universe from “inanimate” matter through “animate”: plants, animals and human-beings – leading up to “Ultimate Perfected Geualh Goal State”, e.g., in which Humanity (and Science) recognize the singularity of this UCP and its “intrinsic-sublime” characteristics of “Morality”, “All-Goodness”, “Peace” and “Harmony” etc., thereby brining Humanity to its current (beginning of) this Ultimate Perfected Geulah State!

References

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2020b). An Urgent Need for "G-D’s Physics" New 21 Century Paradigm's Empirical Validation. Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics. Volume 3 (2), p. 59-65.

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021). "G-D’s Physics”: A New Scientific Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century. iUniverse. ISBN 9781532090370.

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021c). "G-D’s Physics": On the True Nature of “Dark-Energy” & "Dark-Matter". In World Journal of Pharmaceutical & Medical Research, Special Issue: "G-D’s Physics” New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications (In Press). st

Bentovish (Bentwich), J. (2021g). "G-D’s Physics" New 21 Century Paradigm: A Complete Integration of "Space" & "Energy", "Mass" & "Time"! In World Journal of Pharmaceutical & Medical Research, Special Issue: "G-D’s Physics” New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications (In Press).

Dahia, F.; Lemos, A.S. (2016). "Is the proton radius puzzle evidence of extra dimensions?". European Physical Journal. 76 (8): 435. arXiv:1509.08735. Bibcode:2016EPJC...76.435D. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4266-7. S2CID 118672005

Karr, J.; Hilico, L. (2012). "Why three-body physics does not solve the proton-radius puzzle". Physical Review Letters. 109 (10): 103401. arXiv:1205.0633. Bibcode:2012PhRvL.109j3401K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.103401. PMID 23005286. S2CID 12752418 261

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press. pp. 172. LCCN 62019621

Lestone, J.P. (4 October 2017). Muonic atom Lamb shift via simple means (Report). Los Alamos Report. Los Alamos National Laboratory. LA-UR-17-29148.

Liu Y, McKeen D, Miller GA (2016). "Electrophobic Scalar Boson and Muonic Puzzles". Physical Review Letters. 117 (10): 101801. arXiv:1605.04612. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.117j1801L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.101801. PMID 27636468. S2CID 20961

Onofrio, R. (2013). "Proton radius puzzle and quantum gravity at the Fermi scale". EPL. 104 (2): 20002. arXiv:1312.3469. Bibcode:2013EL....10420002O. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/104/20002. S2CID 119243594

Pohl R, Antognini A, Nez F, Amaro FD, Biraben F, et al. (July 2010). "The size of the proton" (PDF). Nature. 466 (7303): 213–216. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..213P. doi:10.1038/nature09250. PMID 20613837. S2CID 4424731.

Pohl R, et al. (2016a). "Laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium". Science. 353 (6300): 669–673. Bibcode:2016Sci... 353..669P. doi:10.1126/science. aaf2468. hdl:10316/80061. PMID 27516595. S2CID 206647315.

Pohl R, et al. (16 September 2016b) "Proton-radius puzzle deepens". CERN Courier. After our first study came out in 2010, I was afraid some veteran physicist would get in touch with us and point out our great blunder. But the years have passed, and so far nothing of the kind has happened.

Zyga, Lisa (November 26, 2013). "Proton radius puzzle may be solved by quantum gravity". Phys.org. Retrieved September 2,2016.

Riess A. G., Casertano S., Yuan W. et al (2018a). Is there any measurable redshift dependence on the SN Ia absolute magnitude? ApJ 861 126

Shajib A. J., Birrer S., Treu T. et al (2020). STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354. MNRAS 494 6072

Scolnic D., Rest A., Riess A. et al (2014). Systematic Uncertainties Associated with the Cosmological Analysis of the First PAN-STARRS1 Type 1a Supernova Sample. ApJ 795 45

Wong K. C., Suyu S. H., Chen G. C. F. et al (2020). H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late- Universe probes. MNRAS 498 1420

Bolton, J.S., Caputo, A., Liu, M. & Viel, M. (2022). Comparison of Low-Redshift Lyman-α Forest Observations to Hydrodynamical Simulations with Dark Photon Dark Matter. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.21110.

Moskowitz, C. (2021). Dark Matter's Last Stand. Scientific American 324, 4, 64-71 (April 2021) doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-64

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Bentovish, J. . (2023). G-D’s Physics”: On the True Nature, Elegance & Purpose of the Universe!. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(1), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.111.13877