A Fluid Dynamic Development Like None Other

Authors

  • Hubert M Quinn Department of Research and Development, The Wrangler Group LLC, 40 Nottinghill Road, Brighton, Ma.02135, USA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.112.14344

Keywords:

Packed Conduits, Empty Conduits, Laminar, Transitional, Turbulent

Abstract

For more than 100 years, much uncertainty has surrounded fluid flow characteristics, both in open pipes and packed conduits. Not the least amongst this uncertainty has been the physics of the viscous boundary layer, in the former, and the so-called “wall-effect”, in the latter. Indeed, no fluid flow model has ever been able to reconcile both packed and empty conduits within the same theoretical framework, until now. In this paper, we describe the Quinn Fluid Flow Model (QFFM), which was first published in 2019 and represents the first model to capture, seamlessly, the physics of both empty and packed conduits, including all elements of wall-effects. This is not the only distinguishing feature of the model, which also includes, again, for the first time, a theoretical description of the so-called “constants” within the pressure flow relationship in closed conduits. Consequently, this model enables fluid dynamic validation over the entire fluid flow regime from creeping flow, at low Reynolds number values, to fully turbulent, at high Reynolds number values. This unique feature is possible because, on the one hand, in empty conduits, extremely large Reynolds number values are achievable at reasonable pressure drops but, very low Reynolds number values are not, due to the pressure drops being prohibitively low. In packed conduits, on the other hand, very low Reynolds number values are achievable at reasonable pressure drops but, large Reynolds number values are not, due to the pressure drops being prohibitively high. Accordingly, the QFFM enables simultaneous validation, at high Reynolds number values in the former and, at low Reynolds number values in the latter. This characteristic, therefore, to validate over the entire fluid flow regime using the same underlying physical and mathematical framework, sets this fluid flow model apart from all others. In addition to highlighting the many features of the QFFM in this paper, we will also demonstrate a comprehensive validation over ten orders of magnitude of the Reynolds number using published classical studies, as well as home grown experiments. To our knowledge, no extant fluid flow model comes even close to this comprehensive description of the fluid dynamics of fluid flow, not only in closed conduits, but also, by extrapolation, in other applications outside of this very narrow field of study.

References

P. C. Carman, “Fluid flow through granular beds,” Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, vol. 15, pp. 155–166, 1937

S. Ergun, Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns, Chem. Eng. Progr. vol. 48, pp. 89-94, 1952

J.L.M. Poiseuille, Memoires des Savants Etrangers, Vol. IX pp. 435-544, (1846); BRILLOUIN, M. (1930) Jean Leonard Marie Poiseuille. Journal of Rheology, 1, 345.

H. Blasius (1908). "Grenzschichten in Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung". Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 56: 1–37

H. M. Quinn, Quinn’s Law of Fluid Dynamics; Pressure-driven Fluid Flow through Closed Conduits. Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, pp. 39-71. doi: 10.11648/j.fm.20190502.12

R. B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 190, 2002

B.J. Mckeon, C.J. Swanson, M.V. Zagarola, R.J. Donnelly and A. J. Smits. Friction factors for smooth pipe flow; J.Fluid Mech. (2004), vol. 511, pp.41-44. Cambridge University Press; DO1;10.1017/S0022112004009796.

B.J. Mckeon, M.V. Zagarola, and A. J. Smits. A new friction factor relationship for fully developed pipe flow; J.Fluid Mech. (2005), vol. 238, pp.429-443. Cambridge University Press; DO1;10.1017/S0022112005005501

C.J. Swanson, B. Julian, G. G. Ihas, and R. J. Donnelly. Pipe flow measurements over a wide range of Reynolds numbers using liquid helium and various gases. J. Fluid mech. (2002), vol. 461, pp.51-60. Cambridge University Press; DO1;10.1017/S0022112002008595

J. Nikuradze, NASA TT F-10, 359, Laws of Turbulent Flow in Smooth Pipes. Translated from “Gesetzmassigkeiten der turbulenten Stromung in glatten Rohren” VDI (Verein Deutsher Ingenieure)-Forschungsheft 356.

J. Nikuradze, NACA TM 1292, Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes, July/August 1933. Translation of “Stromungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren.” VDI-Forschungsheft 361. Beilage zu “ Forschung auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens” Ausgabe B Band 4, July/August 1933.

T. Buchwald, G. Schmandra, L. Schützenmeister, T. Fraszczak, T. Mütze, U. Peuker, Gaseous flow through coarse granular beds: The role of specific surface area. Powder Technology 366 (2020) 821–831

J. C. Giddings, Unified Separation Science, John Wiley & Sons (1991)

H. M. Quinn, Reconciliation of Packed Column Permeability Data-Part 1. The Teaching of Giddings Revisited, Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media-An International Journal 1 (1), (2010) 79-86 Quinn, H. M. (2023). A Fluid Dynamic Development Like None Other. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(2). 407-429.

P. Forchheimer, Wasserbewegung durch boden. Zeit. Ver. Deutsch. Ing 45, 1781–1788 (1901)

F. Gritti , D. S. Bell , G. Guiochona; Particle size distribution and column efficiency, An ongoing debate revived with 1.9 _m Titan-C18 particles; Journal of Chromatography A, 1355 (2014) 179–192

T. Farkas, G. Zhong, G. Guiochon, Validity of Darcy’s Law at Low Flow Rates in Liquid Chromatography Journal of Chromatography A, 849, (1999) 35-43

J. C. Giddings, Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1965

Downloads

Published

2023-04-05

How to Cite

Quinn, H. M. (2023). A Fluid Dynamic Development Like None Other. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(2), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.112.14344