Revisiting the Atomic Shapes, the Strait and Kurve
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.106.13409Abstract
This article revisits the atomic Shapes proposed in the author's earlier Shapes study, which holds that alphabetic written language is built from small underlying building blocks that are also found in the world of objects. Earlier work proposed a binary classification of two atomic Shapes, the Strait and the Kurve, inspired by binary distinctions in linguistics, such as Saussure's dyadic sign, and in other fields such as computing. Drawing on experience with MA and doctoral candidates, colleague linguists and adult language learners, the author now proposes a three-way distinction: the Strait, the Kurve (the C-like Shape) and the Joint (the V-like Shape, previously called a structured Kurve). The binary distinction is retained only in general terms. The article also revises the earlier position that diagonal lines are not Straits, arguing that a Strait may be positioned vertically, horizontally or diagonally, because positioning, like size, is a secondary element that does not create a different Shape. Examples of redundancy in written language, where the same form is treated as different symbols depending on its position, illustrate the approach. The author concludes that the Shapes project remains interdisciplinary and observes that teaching adults the three atomic Shapes underlying all letters first is easier than directly teaching the many different letters of the alphabet.
Abstract prepared by the editorial office from the full text of the article; the authors did not supply one.
References
Awuku, A. S. (2011). The Strait and the Kurve: The Building Blocks of Language Representation. In Particip’Action Vol.3 – N°2, p. 151. Juil. 2011. Université de Lomé, Togo.
Awuku, A. S. (2020). Categorizing With Shapes: Capturing Commonalities in Meaning Representation, an Ongoing Research Project. In International Journal of Management and Applied Science, ISSN: 2394-7926. Volume-6, Issue-1, Jan.-2020.
Awuku, A. S. (2021). R Shape & R Objects-Images Represented in the World: [R, Я, ʁ, ᴚ]. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(6). 42-53.
Awuku, A. S. (2022). C Shape: An Inventory of C and C Images-Objects Represented in the World; An Ongoing Study on Shapes. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(4). 326-339.
Gleason, J. B. & Ratner, N. B. eds, (1998). Psycholinguistics, second edition. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Jacobson, R. (1939). Observations sur le classement phonologique des consonnes (observations on the phonological classification of consonants). Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Phonetics Sciences. 34-41
Ladefoged, P. (1993). A course in Phonetics, third edition. Florida: Harcourt Brace Publishers.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley. O‘Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., Aronoff,
M. (1989). Contemporary Linguistics, an Introduction. New. York: St. Martins Press.
Pullum, G. K. & Ladusaw, W. A. (1986). Phonetic Symbol Guide. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Saussure, F. de. (1996 [1916]). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. (Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959). 24. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell
Publishers Limited. (1996). Phonology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Limited.
Trubetskoy, N. (1939). Principles of Phonology (English translation, Baltaxe 1969). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Urban, G. (2003). Semiotics. In William J. Frawley, ed. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, second edition, 4. 27-29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ameyo S. Awuku

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.