Collapses without measurements

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11825

Keywords:

Transitions between Stationary States, Time Dependent Perturbation Theory, Quantum Measurements, Ambiguity and Incoherence of Orthodox Quantum Mechanics

Abstract

Abstract

In quantum mechanics the state vector evolves in a predictable and continuous way, according to the Schrödinger equation; only if a measurement takes place, the Schrödinger evolution is interrupted. Transitions between stationary states (transitions BSS) are accounted for time dependent perturbation theory (TDPT). It is often ignored that this theory requires measurements. As measurements demand either the intervention of an observer or the interaction between the quantum system with a measuring device, billions of observers and/or measuring devices would be necessary at every small corner of the universe where transitions BSS take place. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of their existence. We are thus led to conclude that transitions BSS are the result of causes different from the measurements required in TDPT. In the spontaneous projection approach, the version of quantum mechanics which we uphold, collapses to the stationary states result from the tendency of the system to jump to the eigenstates of the constants of the motion.

References

Dirac, P.A.M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin.

Jammer, M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Bell, M., Gottfried K., Veltman, M. (2001). John S. Bell on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Word Scientific, Singapore.

Bes, D.R. (2012). Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20556-9

Burgos, M.E. (2016). Success and Incoherence of Orthodox Quantum Mechanics, Journal of Modern Physics. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.712132

Heitler, W. (1984). The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 3rd ed. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

Messiah A. (1965). Quantum Mechanics. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Burgos, M. E. (2022). Collapses Without Measurements. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 550-555.

Burgos, M.E. (2018). Unravelling the Quantum Maze, Journal of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.98106

Burgos, M.E. (2020). Transitions between Stationary States and the Measurement Problem, In Bracken, P. (ed.) Quantum Mechanics. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91801

Ballentine, L.E. (1970). The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics. https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.42.358

Bohm, D.A. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables I, Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166

Bohm, D.A. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. II, Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.180

Bell, J.S. (1984). Beables for quantum field theory, CERN-TH. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812386540_0017

Sudbery. A. (2002). Diese Verdammte Quantenspringerei, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00003-1

Everett, H. (1957). "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454

Griffith, R.B. (1984). Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015734

Omnès, R. (1988). Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations, Journal of Statistical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014230

Zurek, W. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Reviews of Moderns Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715

Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini A., Weber, T. (1987). The puzzling entanglement of Schrödinger's wave function, Foundations of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882871

Burgos, M.E. (1998). Which Natural Processes Have the Special Status of Measurements?, Foundations of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018826910348

Burgos, M.E. (2008). Transitions to the Continuum: Three Different Approaches, Foundations of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9213-5

Burgos, M.E. (2015). The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics Revisited, In Pahlavani, M. (ed.) Selected Topics in Applications of Quantum Mechanics. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59209

Burgos, M.E. (2019). The contradiction between two versions of quantum theory could be decided by experiment, Journal of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2019.1010079

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Burgos, M. E. (2022). Collapses without measurements. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11825