Paramedics’ Experiences of Structured Documentation in the Finnish KEJO Electronic Patient Care Record: A Qualitative Survey Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1403.6945Keywords:
emergency medical services, electronic patient care record, KEJO, structured documentation, usability, user experiencesAbstract
Structured documentation in electronic patient care records is intended to improve the consistency, retrievability and continuity of clinical information. In emergency medical services, however, documentation is performed in mobile, time-critical and clinically complex environments, which places specific demands on system usability and workflow compatibility. This study describes paramedics’ experiences of structured documentation in the KEJO electronic patient care record, the national electronic patient care record used in Finnish emergency medical services. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional survey with a qualitative emphasis. Data were collected in spring 2024 using an anonymous Webropol questionnaire distributed to paramedics working in operational field duties within Oulu University Hospital Emergency Medical Services in Finland. A total of 137 paramedics responded. This article focuses on open-ended responses, which were analysed using inductive content analysis. The findings show that structured documentation in the KEJO electronic patient care record was experienced as challenging particularly because of usability problems, fragmented documentation views, technical slowness and limitations in structured data fields. Respondents described the documentation process as slow, illogical and insufficiently flexible for prehospital care. These challenges were perceived to increase workload, reduce the clarity of documented information and make it more difficult to record clinically relevant details. Shortcomings were also identified in the timing, content and practical implementation of user training. The findings suggest that the further development of the KEJO electronic patient care record should prioritise user-centred design, workflow compatibility, technical reliability and case-based training to better support information continuity, paramedic workflow and patient safety.
References
Mykkänen M, Miettinen M, Saranto K. Structures for recording patient care data – nursing discharge summary. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare. 2018;10(2–3):251–263. https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.68899
Ebbers T, Kool RB, Smeele LE, Dirven R, den Besten CA, Karssemakers LHE, et al. The impact of structured and standardized documentation on documentation quality: a multicenter, retrospective study. Journal of Medical Systems. 2022;46(7):46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9
Ericsson CR, Lindström V, Rudman A, Nordquist H. Paramedics’ perceptions of job demands and resources in Finnish emergency medical services: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22:1469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08856-9
Afshari A, Borzou SR, Shamsaei F, Mohammadi E, Tapak L. Perceived occupational stressors among emergency medical service providers: a qualitative study. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2021;21:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00430-6
Donnelly E. Work-related stress and posttraumatic stress in emergency medical services. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2012;16(1):76–85. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2011.621044
Porter A, Badshah A, Black S, Fitzpatrick D, Harris-Mayes R, Islam S, et al. Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2020;8(10):1–140. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08100
Barrett JW, Eaton-Williams P, Mortimer CED, Land VFP, Williams J. A survey of ambulance clinicians’ perceptions of recording and communicating patient information electronically. British Paramedic Journal. 2021;6(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.1 Scholar Publishing
Ilkka L, Räty T, editors. Kansallinen sähköinen ensihoitokertomus: tietosisältö sekä toiminnallinen ja vaatimusmäärittely. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos; 2017. Ohjaus 15/2017. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-915-6
Lampilinna V, editor. Kirjaamisopas: ensihoito. Version 1.2. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos; 2023. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-408-170-2
National Emergency Medical Services Information System. What is NEMSIS? [Internet]. NEMSIS; n.d. Available from: https://nemsis.org/what-is-nemsis
Ehlers J, Fisher B, Peterson S, Dai M, Larkin A, Bradt L, et al. Description of the 2020 NEMSIS Public-Release Research Dataset. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;27(4):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2022.2079779
Zheng K, Ratwani RM, Adler-Milstein J. Studying workflow and workarounds in EHR-supported work to improve health system performance. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2020;172(11 Suppl):S116–S122. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0871
Jensen FB, Ladefoged KT, Lindskou TA, Søvsø MB, Christensen EF, Teli M. Understanding the effect of electronic prehospital medical records in ambulances: a qualitative observational study in a prehospital setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(5):2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052330
Howe JL, Adams KT, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM. Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1276–1278. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1171
O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2004;4:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25
Mokkink LB, Herbelet S, Tuinman PR, Terwee CB. Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument – a COSMIN perspective. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2025;185:111879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111879
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2004;6(3):e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK; 2019. Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 3/2019. Available from: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. The Finnish code of conduct for research integrity and procedures for handling alleged violations of research integrity in Finland. Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK; 2023. Available from: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-11/RI_Guidelines_2023.pdf
Landman AB, Lee CH, Sasson C, Van Gelder CM, Curry LA. Prehospital electronic patient care report systems: early experiences from emergency medical services agency leaders. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032692
Garza A. National survey on EMS ePCR usability. National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians; 2017. Available from: https://www.naemt.org/docs/default-source/emsdata/ems-epcr-usability-survey-16.pdf Scholar Publishing
Al Haliq S, Al Jumaan M. Digital future of emergency medical services: envisioning and usability of electronic patient care report system. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. 2022;2022:6012241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6012241
Baird S, Boak G. Leading change: introducing an electronic medical record system to a paramedic service. Leadership in Health Services. 2016;29(2):136–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-04-2015-0012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 European Journal of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
