Paramedics’ Perceptions of Training and Competence in Structured Documentation in the Finnish KEJO Electronic Patient Care Record

Authors

  • Jaakko Hihnala Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Emergency Medical Services, Oulu, Finland
  • Niko Sivula Centria University of Applied Sciences, Kokkola, Finland & Wellbeing Services County of Central Ostrobothnia, Kokkola, Finland
  • Petri Roivainen Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland
  • Mari Salminen-Tuomaala Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Seinäjoki, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1405.12326

Keywords:

emergency medical services, professional education, competence development, structured documentation, system implementation, user-centred development

Abstract

Structured electronic patient care records can support consistent documentation, information transfer and secondary data use, but implementation depends on users’ competence and system compatibility with clinical work. Evidence concerning education and competence development for structured documentation in prehospital emergency care remains limited. This secondary analysis examined paramedics’ education and development needs and whether assessments of KEJO training adequacy, timing and documentation competence differed by age, educational background or the electronic patient care record previously used. Data originated from an anonymous cross-sectional web survey conducted in one Finnish wellbeing services county in February–March 2024. Responses from 137 professionals (response rate 30.4%) were examined using descriptive statistics and non-parametric group comparisons, contextualised by previously reported findings and an expanded inductive analysis of free-text responses. Overall, 46.7% considered theoretical instruction sufficient, and the same proportion considered face-to-face training sufficient. Most respondents (83.9%) considered the training-to-implementation interval too long, while 54.7% assessed their documentation competence positively. After Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons, no statistically significant differences were detected across the background groups. Qualitative findings emphasised hands-on practice, authentic cases, simulation, refresher training, concise update materials and timely support. Respondents distinguished educational needs from problems requiring system development. The comparisons provided no evidence of systematic differences between the groups examined. Training should be coordinated with implementation and user-centred system development as a continuous process rather than a single pre-launch event.

References

[1] Strandås M, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Ingstad K, Sepp J, Linnik L, Vaismoradi M. An integrative systematic review of promoting patient safety within prehospital emergency medical services by paramedics: a role theory perspective. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2024;17:1385–1400. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S460194

[2] Dúason S, Ericsson C, Jónsdóttir HL, Viggen Andersen J, Lynge Andersen T. European paramedic curriculum—a call for unity in paramedic education on a European level. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2021;29(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00889-z

[3] Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön asetus ensihoitopalvelusta 585/2017 [Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Emergency Medical Services 585/2017]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2017. Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/lainsaadanto/2017/585

[4] Tanninen APJ, Kouvonen A, Nordquist H. Competence expected from advanced-level paramedics by emergency medical services managers in Finland: a modified Delphi study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2025;33:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01384-5

[5] Hagiwara MA, Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Seffel E, Axelsson C, Munters M, et al. Adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a trigger tool study. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2019;19:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0228-3

[6] Savisalo O, Jokiranta V, Ylitervo O, Siivonen N. Selvitys kirjaamisen kuormittavuudesta ja hyötykäytöstä hyvinvointialueiden kokemana [Report on documentation workload and utilisation as experienced by wellbeing services counties]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2025. Reports and Memorandums of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2025:38. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-6012-1

[7] Ebbers T, Kool RB, Smeele LE, Dirven R, den Besten CA, Karssemakers LHE, et al. The impact of structured and standardized documentation on documentation quality: a multicenter, retrospective study. Journal of Medical Systems. 2022;46(7):46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9

[8] Wurster F, Fütterer G, Beckmann M, Dittmer K, Jaschke J, Köberlein-Neu J, et al. The analyzation of change in documentation due to the introduction of electronic patient records in hospitals—a systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems. 2022;46(8):54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01840-0

[9] Moon Y, Choi MS, Kim SJ, Woo H. The association of workload during healthcare service disruption with the mental health of prehospital emergency medical service providers in Korea. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2025;60:103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103311

[10] Landman AB, Lee CH, Sasson C, Van Gelder CM, Curry LA. Prehospital electronic patient care report systems: early experiences from emergency medical services agency leaders. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032692

[11] Jensen FB, Ladefoged KT, Lindskou TA, Søvsø MB, Christensen EF, Teli M. Understanding the effect of electronic prehospital medical records in ambulances: a qualitative observational study in a prehospital setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(5):2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052330

[12] Porter A, Badshah A, Black S, Fitzpatrick D, Harris-Mayes R, Islam S, et al. Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2020;8(10):1–140. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08100

[13] Barrett JW, Eaton-Williams P, Mortimer CED, Land VFP, Williams J. A survey of ambulance clinicians’ perceptions of recording and communicating patient information electronically. British Paramedic Journal. 2021;6(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.1

[14] Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life. 2020;10(12):327. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327

[15] Finnegan H, Mountford N. 25 years of electronic health record implementation processes: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27:e60077. https://doi.org/10.2196/60077

[16] Baird S, Boak G. Leading change: introducing an electronic medical record system to a paramedic service. Leadership in Health Services. 2016;29(2):136–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-04-2015-0012

[17] Kjær J, Milling L, Wittrock D, Nielsen LB, Mikkelsen S. The data quality and applicability of a Danish prehospital electronic health record: a mixed-methods study. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0293577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293577

[18] Altuwaijri EA, Budgen D, Maxwell S. Factors impeding the effective utilisation of an electronic patient report form during handover from an ambulance to an emergency department. Health Informatics Journal. 2019;25(4):1705–1721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218797984

[19] Al Haliq S, Al Jumaan M. Digital future of emergency medical services: envisioning and usability of electronic patient care report system. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. 2022;2022:6012241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6012241

[20] Ilkka L, Räty T, editors. Kansallinen sähköinen ensihoitokertomus: tietosisältö sekä toiminnallinen ja vaatimusmäärittely [National electronic prehospital patient care record: information content and functional and requirement specifications]. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2017. Ohjaus 15/2017. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-915-6

[21] Kanta Services. Sähköinen ensihoitokertomus [Electronic prehospital patient care record] [Internet]. Kela; 2025 [updated 18 February 2025; cited 30 August 2026]. Available from: https://www.kanta.fi/ammattilaiset/sahkoinen-ensihoitokertomus

[22] Hihnala J, Sivula N. KEJO ensihoitokertomuksen rakenteinen kirjaaminen: ensihoitajien kokemus KEJO ensihoitokertomuksen toimivuudesta ja hyödyistä [Structured documentation in the KEJO electronic patient care record: paramedics’ experiences of its functionality and benefits] [master’s thesis]. Seinäjoki: Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences; 2024. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2024051411510

[23] Hihnala J, Sivula N, Roivainen P, Salminen-Tuomaala M. Paramedics’ experiences of structured documentation in the Finnish KEJO electronic patient care record: a qualitative survey study. European Journal of Applied Sciences. 2026;14(3):244–260. https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1403.6945

[24] Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2018.

[25] Bazeley P. Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417190

[26] Lampilinna V, editor. Kirjaamisopas: Ensihoito. Version 1.2. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2023. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023062865055

[27] O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires—a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2004;4:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25

[28] Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2004;6(3):e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34

[29] Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. 2nd revised ed. Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK; 2019. Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 3/2019. Available from: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf

[30] Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. The Finnish code of conduct for research integrity and procedures for handling alleged violations of research integrity in Finland 2023. Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK; 2023. Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 4/2023. Available from: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-11/RI_Guidelines_2023.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Hihnala, J., Sivula, N., Roivainen, P., & Salminen-Tuomaala, M. (2026). Paramedics’ Perceptions of Training and Competence in Structured Documentation in the Finnish KEJO Electronic Patient Care Record. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(05), 382–408. https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1405.12326

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>