Influence of Successive Subcultures and Hormone Concentrations on Somaclonal Variation in Tissue-Culture-Derived Pineapple (Ananas comosus var. MD2)

Authors

  • Zuraida Ab Rahman Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Hartinee Abbas School of Economics, Finance and Banking, UUM College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
  • Ayu Nazreena Othman Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1305.19322

Abstract

Somaclonal variation is a major limitation in the micropropagation of pineapple (Ananas comosus var. MD2), as it reduces clonal fidelity and impacts commercial planting material. This study investigated the influence of successive subcultures and plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations on morphological variation. Successive subcultures showed no abnormalities up to the 8th passage, but abnormal plantlets began to emerge at the 10th subculture (0.30%) and progressively increased to 0.90% at the 14th subculture. At the 7th subculture, increasing benzylaminopurine (BAP) concentrations caused a dose-dependent rise in abnormalities: 0% at 1 mg L⁻¹, 0.20% at 5 mg L⁻¹, 1% at 7.5 mg L⁻¹, and 3% at 10 mg L⁻¹. Higher BAP levels also shifted plant morphology from predominantly spineless to spiny forms, with full-margin spines reaching 12% at 10 mg L⁻¹. Abnormalities included stunted shoots, distorted leaves, and spiny margins. These findings indicate that extended subculturing and supra-optimal hormone levels induce somaclonal variation, compromising true-to-type regeneration. Limiting subculture cycles (≤8 passages) and maintaining lower PGR concentrations (around 1 mg L⁻¹) are recommended to preserve clonal fidelity in MD2 pineapple micropropagation.

References

Bairu, M.W., Aremu, A.O., & Van Staden, J. (2011). Somaclonal variation in plants: Causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regulation, 63(2), 147–173.

Etienne, H., & Berthouly, M. (2002). Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 69(3), 215–231.

Khan, I.A., Dahot, M.U., Seema, N., Yasmin, S., & Bibi, S. (2011). Genetic variability in banana micropropagated plants derived from somatic embryos and shoot tips. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(2), 755–762.

Krishna, H., Alizadeh, M., Singh, D., Singh, U., Chauhan, N., Eftekhari, M., & Sadh, R.K. (2016). Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0395-5

Miguel, C., & Marum, L. (2011). An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(11), 3713–3725.

Rahman, Z.A., Abbas, H., Othman, A.N., & Sembok, W.Z.W. (2019). Influence of agitation rate on the growth of MD2 pineapple protocorm‑like bodies and shoots in liquid‑shake culture. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10(7), 1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.107088

Taylor, P.W.J., Ko, H.L., Adkins, S.W., Rathus, C., & Birch, R.G. (1995). Establishment of embryogenic callus and high protoplast yielding suspension cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 43(3), 197–204.

Thorpe, T.A. (2007). History of plant tissue culture. Molecular Biotechnology, 37(2), 169–180.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-07

How to Cite

Rahman, Z. A., Abbas, H., & Othman, A. N. (2025). Influence of Successive Subcultures and Hormone Concentrations on Somaclonal Variation in Tissue-Culture-Derived Pineapple (Ananas comosus var. MD2). European Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(05), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1305.19322

Most read articles by the same author(s)