Growth and Productivity of 11-Year-Old Pine Hybrids in Turbo- Kenya

Authors

  • Welimo O. Martin Kenya Forestry Research Institute
  • Ole Kiyiapi James University of Eldoret, Department of Forestry and Wood science
  • Balozi Bekuta Kirongo University of Eldoret, Department of Forestry and Wood science
  • Mercy Gichora Kenya Forestry Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.125.17599

Keywords:

Pines, hybrids, growth, productivity

Abstract

Exotic Plantation species, especially of the Pinus genus are very popular in many countries. In the Tropics, and Kenya in particular, Pinus radiata and Pinus patula are the most widely planted. But exotic species have many challenges and attacks by diseases and pests are common. Research has therefore to keep abreast with establishment effort to thwart massive disease attacks and losses. Species and provenance trials are conducted with this in mind. A Pine hybrids trial was conducted in Turbo, Kenya with the aim of testing the suitability of 11 hybrids against the locally grown Pinus patula. The experiment was established in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Height, Diameter (Dbh) and survival were assessed and results at age 11 years were analyzed and are reported in this paper. Results showed that there were statistically significant differences (p <0.001) in height and Dbh between the hybrids. The control (Pinus patula) performed poorly compared to some of the hybrids. Mean Dbh at 11 years ranged from 12.9cm to 25.68cm for the hybrids against 18.8cm of Pinus patula while mean height range was 11.6m to 23.18m against 20m of Pinus patula. Hybrids volume (D2*H) performance ranged between 328m³ per Ha to 1,894m³ per Ha compared to 1,006.9m³ per Ha for P. patula. The highest volume was found for PatxOoc (patula-by-oocarpa hybrid) with 1,894m³ per Ha. Hybrids PatxTecL and PatxOoc had superior performance for both growth variables (Dbh and Height) throughout the experiment period. These results embrace the view that hybrids are better performing that pure races and that there is value in doing more research in hybrids in the tropics to diversify genetic base and improve growth and productivity.

References

Camcore. Status of pine hybrid project. In 2013 Camcore Annual Report; Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2013; p. 20.

Cappa, E.P., Marcó, M., Garth Nikles, D. et al.: Performance of Pinus elliottii, Pinus caribaea, their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids and Pinus taeda to 10 years in the Mesopotamia region, Argentina. New Forests 44, 197–218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9311-2

Cubbage, F., Mac Donagh, P., Balmelli, G. et al. Global timber investments and trends, 2005-2011. N.Z. j. of For. Sci. 44 (Suppl 1), S7 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S7Morris and Pallet; 2000: Growth rates over four rotations of pine in Swaziland

du Toit B. and Norris C., 2012. Elements of Silvicultural Systems and Regimes used in Southern African Plantations. Section 2.1. du Toit B. (sub-ed.) P. 21-26 in Southern African Forestry

Dungey H.S, 2001: Pine hybrids – a review of their use, performance and genetics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 243–258.

Dvorak, W.S., Hodge, G.R., Gutierrez, E.A., L.F., Malan, F.S. Stanger, T. (2000): Pinus tecunumanii In: Conservation and testing of tropical and sub-tropical forest tree species by the Camcore cooperative. College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp 188-209

Gapare and Musokonyi; 2002: provenance performance and genetic parameter estimates for Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis planted at three sites in Zimbabwe

Handbook, Breden kamp B. V. and Upsold S. J. (eds.). Colour Planet, Pinetown, South Africa

Hargreaves, C.; Reeves, C.; Gough, K.; Montalbán, I.A.; Low, C.; van Ballekom, S.; Dungey, H.S.; Moncaleán, P. Nurse tissue for embryo rescue: Testing new conifer somatic embryogenesis methods in a F1 hybrid pine. Trees 2017, 31, 273–283. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.125.17599 167

Hargreaves, C.; Sigley, M.; Menzies, M.; Dungey, H. Hybrid pines: Opportunities for life on the edge. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. 2008, 58, 62–167.

KEFRI (1990): A guide to tree planting in Kenya

Malan, 2015: Family variation in diameter growth and acoustic velocity in three 5-year-old South African-grown Pinus elliottii×Pinus caribaea progeny trials established on three diverse sites

Mitchell, R.G.; Wingfield, M.J.; Hodge, G.R.; Dvorak, W.S.; Continho, T.A. The tolerance of Pinus patula × Pinus tecunumanii, and other pine hybrids, to Fusarium circinatum in greenhouse trials. New For. 2013, 44, 443–456.

Myers, 2022: Comparing Wood Quality between Naturally Regenerated Longleaf, Planted Longleaf, and Planted Loblolly Pine

Odhiambo, 2013: Republic of Kenya 2012. ‘Releasing Our Full Potential’. Sessional Paper No. 8 of 2012, on the National Policy for the Sustainable Development of Northern Kenya and other Arid Lands. (Final version 11 October) Ministry of State for Development of Northern Kenya and Other Arid Lands, Republic of Kenya, Nairobi

Spittlehouse and Stewart; 2003: Integration of Forest and Climate Change Policies in Nepal

Balozi B.K, G. K. Kimani & S. Kingiri; 2010: Five-year growth and survival of Eucalyptus hybrid clones in coastal Kenya

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

How to Cite

Martin, W. O., James, O. K., Kirongo, B. B., & Gichora, M. (2024). Growth and Productivity of 11-Year-Old Pine Hybrids in Turbo- Kenya. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(5), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.125.17599