Mathematical Modeling for Optimizing Hydropower Production: A Review of Mathematical Models, Operating Factors, and Case Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.123.16920Keywords:
Hydropower, mathematical model, renewable energyAbstract
pHydropower production plays a crucial role in the sustainable energy landscape, and optimizing its operating factors is paramount for maximizing efficiency and output. In this review study, we delve into the world of mathematical modeling to explore the diverse approaches employed in enhancing hydropower production. Five research questions are investigated including the mathematical model used, operating factors, data types, time horizons, and case studies. In all, we analyze 22 primary studies to gain valuable insights into this vital field. Four key categories of mathematical models were utilized in the studies: Physical-based Models, Statistical Models, Optimization Models, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models. Each of these models offers unique perspectives and techniques for optimizing hydropower systems, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field. The data sources adopted exhibit interesting diversity, with a majority of 16 studies relying on primary data, while two studies incorporate secondary data, and four studies employ synthetic data. This broad range of data types contributes to the robustness and accuracy of the findings. Investigating the geographical distribution of case studies, intriguing insights are inferred. China emerges as the dominant case study location, accounting for 55% of the studies. Nigeria follows with 18.2%, while Spain, Korea, and Iran contribute 9% each, underscoring the global significance of hydropower production optimization. Ranging from daily to multi-year perspectives, the data time horizons employed in the review study provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics and long-term trends in hydropower systems./pReferences
Bo Ming, P. L., Feng, M., & Wang, X. (2017). Optimizing utility-scale photovoltaic power generation for integration into a hydropower reservoir by incorporating long- and short-term operational decisions. Applied Energy, 204, 432-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.046
Bolin, Y., Fang, D., & Meng, J. (2021). Analysis of the generation efficiency of disaggregated renewable energy and its spatial heterogeneity influencing factors: A case study of China. Energy, 234, 121295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121295
Chang, J., Li, Y., Yuan, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Efficiency evaluation of hydropower station operation: A case study of Longyangxia station in the Yellow River, China. Energy, 135(15), 23-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.049
Daneshgar, S., & Zahedi, R. (2022). Investigating the hydropower plants production and profitability using system dynamics approach. Journal of Energy Storage, 46, 103919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103919
Doenges, K., Egido, I., Sigrist, L., Miguélez, E. L., & Rouco, L. (2020). Improving AGC Performance in Power Systems With Regulation Response Accuracy Margins Using Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35(4), 2816-2825. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2960450
Gallego-Castillo, C., & Victoria, M. (2021). Improving Energy Transition Analysis Tool through Hydropower Statistical Modelling. energies, 14(1), 98. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010098
Hanoon, M. S., Ahmed, A. N., Razzaq, A., Oudah, A. Y., Alkhayyat, A., Huang, Y. F., . . . El-Shafie, A. (2023). Prediction of hydropower generation via machine learning algorithms at three Gorges Dam, China. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(4), 101919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.10191
Huang, X., Li, Q., Tai, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, J., Shi, J., & Liu, W. (2022). Time series forecasting for hourly photovoltaic power using conditional generative adversarial network and Bi-LSTM. Energy, 246, 123403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123403
Huang, Y., Yang, W., Liao, Y., Zhao, Z., Ma, W., Yang, J., & Yang, J. (2022). Improved transfer function method for flexible simulation of hydraulic-mechanical-electrical transient processes of hydro-power plants. Renewable Energy, 196, 390-404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.14
Kim, M., Choi, W., Jeon, Y., & Liu, L. (2019). A Hybrid Neural Network Model for Power Demand Forecasting. energies, 12(5), 931. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050931
Li, L., Li, H., Tseng, M.-L., Feng, H., & Anthony, S. F. (2020). Renewable Energy System on Frequency Stability Control Strategy Using Virtual Synchronous Generator. Symmetry, 12(10), 1697. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12101697
Lu, L., Yuan, W., Su, C., Wang, P., Cheng, C., Yan, D., & Wu, Z. (2021). Optimization model for the short-term joint operation of a grid-connected. Energy Conversion and Management, 236, 114055.
Lu, L., Yuan, W., Su, C., Wang, P., Cheng, C., Yan, D., & Wu, Z. (2021). Optimization model for the short-term joint operation of a grid-connected wind-photovoltaic-hydro hybrid energy system with cascade hydropower plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 236, 114055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114055
Malhan, P., & Mittal, M. (2022). A novel ensemble model for long-term forecasting of wind and hydro power generation. Energy Conversion and Management, 251, 114983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114983
Meng, X., Chang, J., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Multi-objective hydropower station operation using an improved cuckoo search algorithm. Energy, 168, 425-439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.096
Mingham, C., Qian, L., & Causo, D. (2016). Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Models. Academic Pres, 105-122.
Nwobi-Okoye, C. C., & Igboanugo, A. C. (2012). Performance evaluation of hydropower generation system using transfer function modelling. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 43(1), 245-254.
Olaleye, T. O., Arogundade, O. T., Misra, S., Abayomi-Alli, A., & Kose, U. (2023). Predictive Analytics and Software Defect Severity: A Systematic Review and Future Directions. Scientific Programming. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6221388
Onokwai, A. O., Owamah, H. I., Ibiwoye, M. O., Ayuba, G. C., & Olayemi, O. A. (2022). Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for the optimization of energy generation from Jebba hydro-power plant, Nigeria. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 28(1), 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1806120
Temam, R. (2001). Navier-Stokes equations: theory and numerical analysis. American Mathematical Soc., 343.
Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Han, Y. (2020). Production capacity prediction of hydropower industries for energy optimization: Evidence based on novel extreme learning machine integrating Monte Carlo. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122824
Weldcherkos, T., Salau, A. O., & Ashagrie, A. (2021). Modeling and design of an automatic generation control for hydropower plants using Neuro-Fuzzy controller. Energy Reports, 7, 6626-6637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.143
Xu, C., Xu, Z., & Yang, Z. (2020). Reservoir operation optimization for balancing hydropower generation and biodiversity conservation in a downstream wetland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118885
Xu, Y., Li, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, N., & Peng, B. (2018). Load Frequency Control of a Novel Renewable Energy Integrated Micro-Grid Containing Pumped Hydropower Energy Storage. IEEE Access, 6, 29067-29077. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2826015
Zhou, Y., Guo, S., Chang, F.-J., Liu, P., & Chen, A. B. (2018). Methodology that improves water utilization and hydropower generation without increasing flood risk in mega cascade reservoirs. Energy, 143, 785-796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Olamide O. Olusanya, Ademola P. Olagunju
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
