Mapping Forestry Suitability Land and Landuse in the Highland, Usumacinta Watershed, Mexico

Authors

  • M. López L. Daniel Centroo de investigación en Ciencias de Información Geoespacial, Ciudad de México
  • Saavedra G Aristides Centro de investigación en Ciencias de Información Geoespacial, Ciudad de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.122.16246

Keywords:

Forest land, land suitability, Land use, Usumacinta Watershed, Natural protected areas

Abstract

The Usumacinta Watershed is a trans-boundary basin shared by Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize. It is one of the ecosystems of great importance with a diversity of habitats and species, many of them unique to this area.  In the last decades, the anthropic pressure have exerted on natural ecosystems and land dedicated to productive activities has been increasing, causing  intense negative environmental effects on soil, water, flora and fauna resources, as well as on the ecosystems services that this ecosystem provide. It is the objective of this paper mapping and analyze the  forest land suitability and its present land use. Base  of  land suitability, the forest land  suitability were defined, grouping it in three classes: f1- forest land, slope  12-25%, f-2 Forest  land, slope 25-50%, and f3- forest land, slope >50%; by overlay these classes with present land use, the area occupied  for each one of land-use was defined ; besides considering the natural protected areas,  the proportion that occur inside and outside of this area was defined.From the results can be draw that the forest land suitability in the upland area of Usumacinta watershed occupied an important extension  ( 61.45%) of total area, being  group ”f2- 25-50%”,  the dominant;  the most part of conserved forest areas  are inside of natural protected areas. Nevertheless,  outside of protected areas there are  considerable areas of land forest (according to land suitability) where the natural vegetation, because antropic pressure,  has been replaced to secondary vegetation, grasslands and crops; because of high environmental risk of these uses,  they must be considered in a program to recovery the natural vegetation for  conservation and protection of soils, water and forests resources.

References

March, I.J. (Coord.). Selva Lacandona Siglo XXI, Estrategia Conjunta para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad. Documento rector.2004. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas.

Conservation International -Program México y America Central, 2004. North region of HOTSPOT of Mesoamerica’s biodiversity, Belize, Guatemala, México. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, 64

Institut o Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 2001. Guía metodológica para clasificación de tierras por capacidad de uso, subdirección de Agrología, Bogotá D. C. P 36.

López L. Daniel y Aristides Saavedra G. 2023a.Soil Survey Relevant Information for Land Suitability Zoning and Territorial Planning. Case Study Usumacinta Watershed Mexico. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 2023, Vol. 11, No. 3, Publication, Date: June 25.

Beinroth F.H., Eswaran H., and Reich P. F. 2001. Edaphic constraints on food production. In: D.E. Stott, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Steinhardt (eds). 2001. Sustaining the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10th 29 International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting held May 24-29, 1999 at Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228464792_Global_Assessment_of_Land_Quality#fullTextFileContent [accessed Oct 22 2023].

Sanchez P.A., Couto, W., and Buol, S.W. 1982. The fertility capability soil classification system: Interpretation, application and modification. Geoderma 27: 283-309.

Gopalakrishnan, G., Negri, M.C., Snyder, S.W., 2011. A novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feed stock production. J. Environ. Qual. 40, 1593–1600. https: Esch, E., Mccann, K., Kamm, C., Arce, B., Carroll, O., Dolezal, A., Mazzorato, A., Noble,

D., Fraser, E., Fryxell, J., Gilvesy, B., Canada, A., Krumholz, S., Campbell, M., Macdougall, A., 2021. Rising Farm Costs, Marginal Land Cropping, and Ecosystem Service Markets. Doi: 10.21203/RS.3.RS-223049/V1.//doi.org/10.2134/JEQ2010.0539.

Hart, J.F., 2001. Half a century of cropland change. Geogr. Rev. 91, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594739.

10.Milbrandt, A., Overend, R.P. Assessment of Biomass Resources from Marginal Lands in APEC Economies, August 2009. url. http://www.nrel.gov. date acces: 05.02.2022.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. 2000. Land resource potential and Constraints at regional and country levels. World Soil Resources Report FAO 90. Based on the work of A. J. Bot, F.O. Nachtergaele and A. Young. Land and Water Development Division. Roma.

United nations. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992 AGENDA 21

Rodriguez A. Yosu. 2023.Las localidades en el entorno del río Usumacinta en México en el año 2020. (unpublished)

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática-INEGI, 2008. Conjunto de datos vectorial Edafológico escala 1: 250 000 Serie II (Continuo Nacional). http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/edafologia/default.aspx

López L. Daniel y Aristides Saavedra G. 2023b. Detailed Land Cover and Land Use Mapping, New Approach: Case Study, Usumacinta Watershed, Mexico. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, Publication, Date: febrero 25, 2023

National Commission of Natural Protected Areas, CONANP, 2014. Federal Natural Protected Areas of the Mexican Republic at different scales. México.

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento - CONABIO. 2010. El Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña en México: Amenazas y Oportunidades para su Conservación y Manejo Sostenible, Mexico.

Proyecto Desarrollo Social Sostenible. PRORODESIS. 2012. Libro Blanco de la Selva. Epysa

Buda Arango Gabriela, Trench Tim and Durand Leticia. 2014. The use of camedor palm in the Lacandon Forest, Chiapas, Mexico. Conservation with development?. Estudios Sociales, 44.

TEJEDA C. 2014. Conservación de la biodiversidad y comunidades locales Contradicciones y conflictos en áreas naturales protegidas de la selva lacandona, Chiapas, México (periodo 1972-2001. UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CHIAPAS, Dirección General de Investigación y Posgrado / Unidad de Divulgación Científica.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-13

How to Cite

Daniel, M. L. L., & Aristides, S. G. (2024). Mapping Forestry Suitability Land and Landuse in the Highland, Usumacinta Watershed, Mexico. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.122.16246