The Action Parameters, ε0-1& μ0 of Cosmic Ether Tension Field, are Behind the Emergence of all Observable Realities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.116.15380Keywords:
Cosmic Ether, ether as the unifying field, ether energetic tension field, (1/ ε0)-electric tension of ether, μ0-magnetic resistance of ether, particles as localized EM oscillating modes of ether, particles are SL-IP, Self-Looped In-Phase EM oscillationsAbstract
The paper presents the case that physics is already and effectively unified by the energetic tension field, Cosmic Ether. We identify this integrating power of ether first, by re-defining the action generating parameters of this energetic tension field as the electric-tension, ε0-1, and the magnetic-resistance, μ0, while re-deriving the Maxwell’s wave equation in analogy with the mechanically stretched string, where the c02 = ε0-1/μ0. Then, replacement of c02 by ε0-1/μ0 and m0 by E/c02 = E(μ0/ε0-1), one can find that almost all working physics theories are being energized by ε0-1 and μ0. To complete the unification, we can now postulate that the particles are also freely propagating EM waves, but they are spatially localized as close-looped in-phase, (CLIP) torus-like complex propagation modes of ether. Because of their CLIP mode structure, they have space-finite spatial structures and remain spatially stationary in the absence of any spatially influencing potential gradients (forces) in their vicinity. Particles’ harmonic phase driven interactions between quantum particles gives birth to the appearance of wave-particle duality. There is no need for the confusing and unnecessary de Broglie’s Pilot Wave. The inertia to spatial motion of CLIP modes automatically accommodates Newton’s laws of motion. The cosmic universality of Maxwellian wave velocity, and particles as CLIP modes, jointly accommodate the two key postulates of special relativity without the need for unphysical four-dimensionality. The observable universe is represented only by its diverse oscillatory excited states. The stable and stationary Cosmic Ether keeps holding 100% of its energy all the time. We do not need to keep searching for Dark Energy and Dark Matter. We have proposed a one-way light pulse propagation experiment to directly validate the existence of ether, rather than approaching Michelson’s way of measuring the ether drag. We have identified a good number of examples of working theoretical expressions in terms of ε0-1 and μ0 and presented our critical views in physics thinking, belonging to Classical, Relativity, Quantum and Cosmology Physics.
References
Amoroso, R. L. and Vigier, J-P, “Can one unify gravity and electromagnetic fields?” From [Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale], Amoroso, R. L., Hunter, G. and Vigier, J-P (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, (2002).
Kovacs A, Vassallo G, O’Hara P, Celani F, Di Tommaso A. O. [Unified Field Theory and Occam's Razor: Simple Solutions to Deep Questions], World Scientific; (2022).
Consoli, M, & Pluchino, A, [Michelson-Morley Experiments: An Enigma for Physics and the History of Science], World Scientific Publishing (2018).
Roychoudhuri, C., Next Frontier in Physics—Space as a Complex Tension Field, Journal of Modern Physics, 3, 1357-1368 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2012.310173
Smolin, L., [The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory], The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next, Houghton Mifflin Co., (2007).
Hossenfelder, S., [Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray], Hachette Book Group (2019).
Rangacharyulu, C. and Polachic, C. J. A., [From Atoms to Higgs Bosons: Voyages in Quasi-Spacetime], Taylor and Francis (2019).
See the journal - Foundations of Physics. The readers should consult this journal. It is an excellent source for current papers on the foundational questions in physics.
See the journal - Physics Essays. This is another journal that should be consulted by the readers. Excellent source for papers on out-of-box thinking.
Huygens, C., [Treatise on Light], (1690). Free download: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14725
Goodman, J. W., [Introduction to Fourier Optics], W. H. Freeman (2017).
Planck, M., [The Theory of Heat Radiation], Blakistons Son & Co. (1914); now available from Dover and free downloads from Gutenberg eBook.
Roychoudhuri, C. [Causal Physics: Photon by Non-Interaction of Waves], Taylor & Francis, 2014.
Zajonc, A., “Light reconsidered”, in “Nature of Light: What is a Photon?” Guest editors, C. Roychoudhuri & R. Roy. A special issue of the “Optics & Photonics News”, published by Optica (formerly Optical Society of America), (2003). Free download: https://natureoflight.org/CP/Pubs/download.php?f=2003.3
Roychoudhuri, C., Prasad N. and Fernando, G., “Where lies the quantumness behind detecting electromagnetic waves for frequencies from infrared and up?”, Proc. SPIE Vol.122330G, (2022). doi: 10.1117/12.2635066.
Roychoudhuri, C., “Cosmic Ether, Possessing Electric-Tension and Magnetic-Resistance, Is the Unified Field for Physics”, Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 671-699, (2021). https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.125044.
Omnes, R., [The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics], Princeton series in Physics, 1994.
Yanofsky, N. S. & Mannucci, M. A., “Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists”, Cambridge University Press, (2008).
Mannheim, P. D., “Why Do We Believe in Dark Matter and Dark Energy—And Do We Have to?” In: M. D’Onofrio and C. Burigana, Eds., [Questions of Modern Cosmology—Galileo’s Legacy], Springer Publishing Company, Heidelberg, (2009).
Elmore, W. C. and Heald, M. A., Physics of Waves, McGraw-Hill (1969).
Einstein, A., “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, Annalen der Physik, Vol. 17, p.891 (1905).
Arons, A. B. and Peppard, M. B., “Einstein’s Proposal of the Photon Concept – a Translation of the Annalen der Physik of 1905”. Am. J. Phys. Vol.33 (5), (1965).
Pena, L de la, Cetto, A. M. and Hernandez, A. V., [The Emerging Quantum: The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics], Springer (2015).
Roychoudhuri, C., “Locality of superposition principle is dictated by detection processes, Phys. Essays 28 (3), (2006).
Jackson, J. D., [Classical Electrodynamics], Wiley (1999).
Michelson, A. [Studies in Optics], Dover (1995).
Jaffe, R. I., “Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D 72,021301(R) (2005).
Paul, H., [Introduction to Quantum Optics], Cambridge U. Press, (2004).
Roychoudhuri, C. & Prasad, N., “Complex interaction processes we need to visualize that successfully fill the quantum cup of a detector”, Proc. SPIE Vol.10926, paper109260T (2019). doi: 10.1117/12.2514835
Kulchin, Yu. N., [Modern Optics and Photonics of Nano- and Microsystems], C. R. C Press, (2018).
Deyasi, A., Debnath, P., et al. [Photonics, Plasmonics and Information Optics: Research and Technological Advances], C. R. C. Press, (2021).
Choudhury, P. K., [Metamaterials: Technology and Applications], Taylor & Francis, (2021).
Schwartz, M., [Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model], Cambridge U. Press (2014).
Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem. See Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems Roychoudhuri, C. (2023). Cosmic Ether Is the Unified Field of Physics. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(6). 331-361.
Nagel, E. and Newman J., R., [Godel’s Proof], New York University, (2001).
Mehra, J. and Rechenberg, H., [The Historical Development of Quantum Theory], Springer-Verlag, (2001).
Osmera, P., “Vortex-ring-fractal Structure of Atoms”; Engineering Letters, 18:2EL_18_2_02 (2010).
Alexandrou, C., “Colloquium: The Shape of hadrons”; Rev. Mod. Phys., 84, Jul.-Sept. (2012).
Roychoudhuri, C., “The Double-Slit & the Mach-Zehnder Interferometer: Re-visiting through Asymmetry”, Ch.8 in [Fundamental Research and Applications of Physical Sciences], Vol.3, Ed. S-H Dong, B. P. International, (2023). DOI: 10.9734/bpi/fraps/v3/6355A.
Romashka, M. Yu., “Gravity EM Electromagnetic Origin of Particle Masses and Gravity: a Relativistic Theory”, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2020, Vol. 26, No. 1, p. 61, (2020).
Munhoz-Rojas, P. E. “New Theory of Matter”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335949958_New_Theory_of_Matter?enrichId=rgreqccc60c25d97809beab9ef5a3381d364dXXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzMzNTk0OTk1ODtBUzo4MDUyNjgxNDk1MTQyNDdAMTU2OTAwMjI5 NjY5MQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf, Conf. paper (2019).
Antusch, S., et al, “Energy distribution and equation of state of the early Universe: Matching the end of inflation and the onset of radiation domination”, Physics Letters B Vol.811, 135888 (2020).
Rourke, C., “A new paradigm for the universe”, arXiv:astro-ph/0311033v5, 29 May (2019).
Mannheim, P. D., “Alternatives to dark matter and dark energy”, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics,
Mannheim, P. D., “Making the Case for Conformal Gravity”, Found. Phys. 42:388–420 (2012).
Gupta, R. P., “Static and Dynamic Components of the Redshift”, International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.8 No.3, September (2018).
Shao, Mh., “The energy loss of photons and cosmological redshift”, Physics Essays Vol.26 (2), p.183 (2013).
Roychoudhuri, C., Tribute to H. John Caulfield: Hijacking of the ‘Holographic Principle’ by cosmologists, Proc. SPIE 8833-15 (2013).
Frercks, J., “Fizeau’s Research Program on Ether Drag: A Long Quest for a Publishable Experiment”, Physics in Perspective, 7, 35-65 (2005). DOI 10.1007/s00016-004-0224-0.
Panofsky, W. K. H., & Phillips, M., [Classical Electricity and Magnetism], Addition-Wesley, (1962).
Lee, D-I & Roychoudhuri, C., “Measuring properties of superposed light beams carrying different frequencies”, Optics Express Vol.11, No.8, p.944, 2003.
Roychoudhuri, C., “The Consilient Epistemology: Structuring Evolution of Our Logical Thinking”, pp. 273-295, [Proceeding of 1st Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference]; Eds. Rangacharyulu and Haven; World Scientific (2010), London.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.