Virtual Care versus Traditional Clinical Visits Post COVID 19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.114.15150Abstract
The practice of treating a variety of medical illnesses without meeting the patient is known as telemedicine. Healthcare professionals can diagnose a patient’s condition and handle their issues remotely via telehealth platforms like live video, audio, or instant messaging. This can be offering them medical advice, guiding them through exercises they can do at home, or referring them to a nearby facility or provider. The development of telemedicine apps, which allow patients to get care directly from their phones or tablets, is even more intriguing. Of course, it can be difficult to manage some conditions remotely. Telemedicine is frequently utilized to deliver specialized services, manage chronic disorders, and treat common illnesses. The remote practitioner will advise a patient to seek in-person medical attention if they have an urgent or critical ailment. Virtual care is a broad phrase that refers to any form of distant patient interaction used by healthcare practitioners. This can be following up after an in-person appointment, keeping an eye on vitals following surgery, or answering any inquiries about their diagnosis, condition, or treatment strategy. Simply expressed, the phrase "virtual care" refers to all the ways that patients and doctors can interact digitally and in real-time. While virtual care is a much larger word that applies to a range of digital healthcare services, telemedicine refers to long-distance patient care. Physical patient care is a traditional health care method laying a strong foundational structure as compared to virtual care but nowadays specifically after the covid-19 outbreak a significant rise in virtual care setups has been seen and it is increasing way more swiftly than any other domain. One of the major reasons behind this accelerated shift is real-time access and cost-effectiveness of virtual setups reducing overall follow-up rates and waiting times. In a study by Herzer and Pronovost ( 2021) has depicted that using virtual care visits can reduce the entire cost of patient care for any suitable illnesses. (1)
References
Herzer, K. R., & Pronovost, P. J. (2021). Ensuring Quality in the Era of Virtual Care. JAMA, 325(5), 429–430.
Pflugeisen, B. M., & Mou, J. (2017). Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care. Maternal and child health journal, 21(7), 1544–1551.
McDonnell, J. M., Ahern, D. P., Ross, T. D., Gibbons, D., Synnott, K. A., & Butler, J. S. (2022). The efficacy of remote virtual care in comparison to traditional clinical visits for elective orthopaedic patients: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials. The surgeon: journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 20(3), 177–186
Zulman, D. M., & Verghese, A. (2021). Virtual Care, Telemedicine Visits, and Real Connection in the Era of COVID-19: Unforeseen Opportunity in the Face of Adversity. JAMA, 325(5), 437–438.
Shah, S. J., Schwamm, L. H., Cohen, A. B., Simoni, M. R., Estrada, J., Matiello, M., Venkataramani, A., & Rao, S. K. (2018). Virtual Visits Partially Replaced In-Person Visits In An ACO-Based Medical Specialty Practice. Health affairs (Project Hope), 37(12), 2045–2051.
McGrail, K. M., Ahuja, M. A., & Leaver, C. A. (2017). Virtual Visits and Patient-Centered Care: Results of a Patient Survey and Observational Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(5), e177
Pflugeisen, B. M., McCarren, C., Poore, S., Carlile, M., & Schroeder, R. (2016). Virtual Visits: Managing prenatal care with modern technology. MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing, 41(1), 24–30.
Al-Sofiani, M. E., Alyusuf, E. Y., Alharthi, S., Alguwaihes, A. M., Al-Khalifah, R., & Alfadda, A. (2021). Rapid Implementation of a Diabetes Telemedicine Clinic During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: Our Protocol, Experience, and Satisfaction Reports in Saudi Arabia. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 15(2), 329–338.
Kotecha, A., Bonstein, K., Cable, R., Cammack, J., Clipston, J., & Foster, P. (2015). Qualitative investigation of patients' experience of a glaucoma virtual clinic in a specialist ophthalmic hospital in London, UK. BMJ open, 5(12), e009463.
Spelman, J. F., Brienza, R., Walsh, R. F., Drost, P., Schwartz, A. R., Kravetz, J. D., Pitkin, P., & Ruser, C. (2020). A Model for Rapid Transition to Virtual Care, VA Connecticut Primary Care Response to COVID-19. Journal of general internal medicine, 35(10), 3073–3076.
Butler Tobah, Y. S., LeBlanc, A., Branda, M. E., Inselman, J. W., Morris, M. A., Ridgeway, J. L., Finnie, D. M., Theiler, R., Torbenson, V. E., Brodrick, E. M., Meylor de Mooij, M., Gostout, B., & Famuyide, A. (2019). Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 221(6), 638.e1–638.e8. Ahmed, N. (2023). Virtual Care versus Traditional Clinical Visits Post COVID 19 Pandemic. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(4). 325-329.
Prvu Bettger, J., Green, C. L., Holmes, D. N., Chokshi, A., Mather, R. C., 3rd, Hoch, B. T., de Leon, A. J., Aluisio, F., Seyler, T. M., Del Gaizo, D. J., Chiavetta, J., Webb, L., Miller, V., Smith, J. M., & Peterson, E. D. (2020). Effects of Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation In-Home Therapy Compared with Traditional Care After Total Knee Arthroplasty: VERITAS, a Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 102(2), 101–109.
Lin, J. C., Crutchfield, J. M., Zurawski, D. K., & Stevens, C. (2018). Implementation of a virtual vascular clinic with point-of-care ultrasound in an integrated health care system. Journal of vascular surgery, 68(1), 213–218
Watson, A. J., Grant, R. W., Bello, H., & Hoch, D. B. (2008). Brave new worlds: how virtual environments can augment traditional care in the management of diabetes. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200422
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Noha Ahmed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
