Synthesis and Characterization of Stimuli-Responsive Poly (Maleic Acid-Co-Malic Acid-Co-Propane-1,2-Diol-Co-Adipic Acid)

Authors

  • Md. Abdul Matin Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh
  • Monishita Nuzhat Chowdhury Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh
  • Anjuman Ara Khatun Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh
  • Jahanara Nasrin Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh
  • Abu Mahmud Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.112.14193

Keywords:

Polymer, Stimuli-Responsive, Co-Polyester, Biodegradable, Enteric Coating

Abstract

Poly (Maleic acid-co-Malic acid-co-Propane-1,2-diol-co-Adipic acid) was synthesized using the Dean-Stark apparatus. Stoichometric proportions of maleic acid, malic acid, adipic acid and propane-1, 2-diol were taken in a round bottom flask along with a trace amount of anhydrous ferric chloride which worked as catalyst and o-xylene  used as reaction medium. The total system was heated at temp. 135-1400C for about 5 hours. Molecular weight, FTIR-spectra, thermo gravimetric and elemental analysis, solubility tests in common organic solvents, melting point and degradation tests were used for the characterization of the synthesized co-polyester. At room temperature (300C) the hydrolytic degradation study of the co-polyester in solutions of various pH values (pH=1.15-4.40) showed that, there has no degradation of the co-polyester, but it gradually degraded in solutions of pH values 6.50-8.99. This showed its stimuli-responsive characteristics. The co-polyester almost 70% degraded in normal soil within 30 days indicating its biodegradable nature. If satisfactory toxicity result of the synthesized co-polyester is observed, it might be usable as an enteric coating material.

References

Asano, M., Yoshida, M., Maetsu, I.,Imai,K.,Tooru,M.,Yuasa,H.,Yamanaka,H.&Suzuki,K.(1985).Macromol.Chem.Rapid Commun.6, 509.

Bakr, M.A., Hasan, K.,Islam,M.A.,Khatun,S.,Mannan,M.A.andAra,K.S.(2006) .J.Polym.Mater.23 ,217-222.

Bakr, M.A., Islam, M.A., Karim, M.A. and Ahmed,M.. (2000) .J.Polym.Mater.17 ,467-472.

Bawa,P., Pillay1,V., Choonara ,Yahya E. and Toit, Lisa C du. (2009) “Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications in drug delivery”1-2

Bertrand N, Leroux JC.; Leroux (2011). "The journey of a drug carrier in the body: an anatomo-physiological perspective". Journal of Controlled Release. 161 (2): 152–63.

Devi,K.S. and Vasudevan,P.(1985).JMS.Rev.Macromol.Chem.Phys.C 25(3),315.

Galaev, Igor; Mattiasson, Bo, eds. (2010). Smart Polymers: Applications in Biotechnology and Biomedicine. CRC Press. ISBN 1439858160. Retrieved 2013-03-20.

Gliding,D.K. & Reed,A.M.(1979).Polymer 20, 1459.

Grsham,N.B.(1978).J.British Polym. 10,260.

Heller,J.(1980). Biomaterials 1, 50.

Muller, R and Keck, C .(2004)"Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs – a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles". Journal of Biotechnology. 113 (1–3):151–170.

Rosenberg, H.B., Chang,J.,Wnek,G.E.,Linhardt,R.J.&Langer,R.(1993).J.Biomaterials 4, 131.

Saltzman,W.Mark and Torchilin, Vladimir P. (2008). "Drug delivery systems". AccessScience. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Siniaguine,O .& Kachiguina,E.(2015) "Self-adaptive and optionally also otherwise adaptable wound dressing",US patent US9050211 B2.

Wolcott, R.; Fischenich, V. (2014). "Ultimate Standardization of First-Line Wound Dressings to a Single Type". Today's Wound Clinic. 8 (3).

Downloads

Published

2023-04-13

How to Cite

Matin, M. A., Chowdhury, M. N., Khatun, A. A., Nasrin, J., & Mahmud, A. (2023). Synthesis and Characterization of Stimuli-Responsive Poly (Maleic Acid-Co-Malic Acid-Co-Propane-1,2-Diol-Co-Adipic Acid). European Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(2), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.112.14193