Steven Test Modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.111.14053Abstract
The Steven test was introduced for studying low velocity impact initiation of explosives. The original diagnostics of the Steven test were blast gauges at a distance of about 3m. Trying to use these diagnostics to characterize the response of the explosive after its ignition, we realized that they’re not informative enough. We therefore replaced the blast gauges by velocity gauges, looking at the free surface of the back plate of the test sample. Our explosive is similar to LX07, and we performed several tests with impact velocities from 30m/s to 122m/s. The velocity histories we obtained from the gauges show the following: 1) there is a rather long delay between impact and ignition (or gauge response), 50µs for the highest impact velocity and around 250 µs for the 36m/s impact; 2) there’s no ignition at the impact velocity of 30m/s; 3) the gauge velocity histories rise gradually to a maximum and then continue with elastic oscillations. We model the response of the explosive assuming that it reacts through shear initiation. The projectile impact causes shear flow in the explosive, which leads to strain localization and formation of shear bands. The shear bands heat up and reach ignition temperature and deflagration waves expand out of them, similar to deflagration waves out of hot spots for shock initiation. Shear initiated reaction rate is rather slow as: 1) shear bands are surfaces (and not spots); and 2) the average distance between shear bands is of the order of 1mm, and not 0.1mm (as for hot spots). Also, shear-initiated reaction rate depends on pressure and not on reactant temperature (as for hot spot initiation). Here we use our PDSR (= Pressure Dependent Shear Reaction) model to reproduce our Steven test data. We get good agreement with delay times and amplitudes of the velocity gauge outputs.
References
S.K. Chidester and L.G. Green, A frictional work predictive method for the initiation of solid high explosives from low pressure impacts, 10th Int. Det. Symp., ONR 3395-12, 786 (1993).
S.K. Chidester, C.M. Tarver and R.G. Garza, Low amplitude impact testing and analysis of pristine and aged solid high explosives, 11th Int. Det. Symp., ONR 33300-5, 93 (1998).
R.E. Winter and J.E. Field, The role of localized plastic flow in the impact initiation of explosives, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A343 (1975). th
R.B. Frey, The initiation of explosive charges by rapid shear. In: Proc. 7 Symp. on Det., NSWC MP 82-334, 36-42 (1981).
Y. Partom, Hydro-reactive computations with a temperature dependent reaction rate, CP620, Shock compression of condensed matter, 460-463 (2001). Partom, Y. (2023). Steven Test Modeling. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(1). 576-583.
J.L. Maienschein, J. Wardell, M. DeHaven and K. Black, Deflagration of HMX based explosives at high temperatures and pressures, Propellants, Explosives and Pyrotechnics 29, 287 (2004).
P.C. Hsu, E. Glascoe, L. Fried, H.K. Springer and J.L. Maienschein, Material property characterization of thermally damaged HMX based formulations, 15th Int. Det. Symp., ONR 43-280-15, 675 (2014).
M.J. Ward, S.F. Son and M.Q. Brewster, Steady deflagration of HMX with simple kinetics: A gas phase chain reaction model, Combust. Flame 114, 556-568 (1998).
W.L. Perry, Transport phenomena for nonshock initiation processes, in shock waves science and technology reference library, vol. 5, B.W. Assay (Ed.), Springer, 15 (2010).
Y. Partom, Modeling of shear band interaction in 1D torsion, Shock compression of condensed matter (2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Y. Partom

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.