Two-way Quantum Key Distribution Under Fully Measurement-Device-Independent Assumption

Authors

  • Jie Liu School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
  • Ting Zhang School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
  • Xiao Lu Wu School of Computer Science and Engineering, Jishou University Jishou 416000, China School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
  • Guo-Dong Kang School of Computer Science and Engineering, Jishou University Jishou 416000, China School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education College of Physics and Information Science, Hunan Normal University Changsha, Hunan 410081, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.106.13549

Keywords:

Two-way quantum key distribution; Fully measurement-device-independent; Security proof.

Abstract

In this paper, we prove the security of the LM05’s two-way quantum key distribution (TWQKD) under the assumption that detector devices in both Alice’s and Bob’s sides are controlled by eavesdroppers. Using a relatively simple method, more practical, we give an analytical proof that LM05’s TWQKD is measurement-device-independent (MDI) security in both the quantum forward channel and the quantum backward channel. This is the first work shows that TWQKD has fully MDI characteristic, thus makes it immune to all possible detector-device-attacks in two-quantum-way in actual implementations.

References

Bennett, C.H. and Brassard, G., Quantum cryptography public key distribution and coin tossing. In: International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, vol, 1984.9–12: p. 175–179.

Lo, H-K., and Chau, H.F., Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances. Science, 1999. 283(5410): p. 2050–2056.

Mayers, D., Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO’96. Springer. Berlin, 1996: p. 343–357.

Shor, P.W., and Preskill, J., Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Physical review letters, 2000.85(2): p. 441–444

Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., and Tittel, W., et al., Quantum cryptography. Review of Modern Physics, 2000.74(1): p. 145–Boaron, A., Boso, G., and Rusca, D., et al., Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber. Physical review letters, 2018.121(19): p. 9–13.

Liao, S.-K., Cai, W.-Q., and Liu, W.-Y., et al., Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature, 2017.549(7670): p. 43–47

Zhao, Y., Fung, C.-H. F., and Qi, B C., et al., Quantum hacking: Experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems[J]. Physical Review A, 2008.78(4): 042333.

Xu, F., Qi, B., and Lo, H.K., Experimental demonstration of phase-remapping attack in a practical quantum key distribution system[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2010. 12(11): 113026.

Lydersen, L., Wiechers, C., and Wittmann, C., et al., Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination[J]. Nature photonics, 2010. 4(10): p. 686-689.

Gaidash, A., Kozubov, A., and Miroshnichenko, G., Countermeasures for advanced unambiguous state discrimination attack on quantum key distribution protocol based on weak coherent states[J]. Physica Scripta, 2019. 94(12): 125102.

Lo, H, K., Curty, M., and Qi, B., Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution[J]. Physical review letters, 2012. 108(13): 130503.

Rubenok, A., Slater, J., and Chan, P., et al., A quantum key distribution system immune to detector attacks. Arxiv preprint 2012. arXiv:1204.0738.

S, Da., T, Ferreira., and Vitoreti, et al., Proof-of-principle demonstration of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using polarization qubits[J]. Physical Review A: Atomic, 2013.

Liu, Y., Chen, T.-Y., and Wang, L.-J., et al., Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Physical review letters, 2013.111(13): 130502–130505

Tang, Z., Liao, Z., and Xu, F., et al., Experimental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-deviceindependent quantum key distribution. Physical review letters, 2014.112(19): 190503–190506

Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., and Yu, Z.-W., et al., Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404 km optical fiber. Physical review letters, 2016.117(19): 190501–190515

Ma, X., Zeng, P., and Zhou, H., Phase-matching quantum key distribution[J]. Physical Review X, 2018. 8(3): 0310431-03104326.

Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., Shields, A.J., Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature, 2018.557: p. 400–403.

Fang, X. T., et al. Implementation of quantum key distribution surpassing the linear rate-transmittance bound. Nature Photonics 14.7(2020): p.1-4.

Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., et al., Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: Secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km[J]. Physical review letters, 2020. 124(7): 070501.

Boström, K., and Felbinger, T., Deterministic secure direct communication using entanglement[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2002. 89(18): 187902.

Lucamarini, M., and Mancini, S., Secure deterministic communication without entanglement[J]. Physical review letters, 2005. 94(14): 140501.

Lu, H., Fung, C.-H. F., Ma, X., Cai, Q.-Y., Unconditional security proof of a deterministic quantum key distribution with a two-way quantum channel[J]. Physical Review A, 2011. 84(4): 042344.

Fung, C.-H. F., Ma, X., Chau, H F., Cai, Q.-Y., Quantum key distribution with delayed privacy amplification and its application to the security proof of a two-way deterministic protocol[J]. Physical Review A, 2012. 85(3): 032308.

Kang, G.-D., Zhou, Q.-P., and Fang M.-F., Two-way quantum key distribution in a uniformly distributed quantum space via a special mapping and its analytical security proofs[J]. International Journal of Quantum Information, 2019. 17(01).

Lucamarini, M., Cere, A., and Giuseppe, G D., et al., Two-Way Protocol with Imperfect Devices[J]. Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 2007. 14(2): p.169-178.

Cai, Q.-Y., The ping-pong protocol can be attacked without eavesdropping[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003.91: 109801.

Wójcik, A., Eavesdropping on the “ping-pong” quantum communication protocol[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003. 90(15): 157901.

Lu, H., Fung, C.-H. F., and Cai, Q.-Y., Two-way deterministic quantum key distribution against detector-side-channel attacks[J]. Physical Review A, 2013. 88(4): 044302:1-044302.

Cai, Q.-Y., Eavesdropping on the two-way quantum communication protocols with invisible photons[J]. Physics Letters A, 2006. 351(1-2): p.23-25.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-06

How to Cite

Liu, J., Zhang, T., Wu, X. L., & Kang, G.-D. (2022). Two-way Quantum Key Distribution Under Fully Measurement-Device-Independent Assumption. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(6), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.106.13549