Competitive vs Collaborative Clinical Nutritionists: The European Clinical Nutrition Market

Authors

  • Garduno-Diaz
  • Frost

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12265

Keywords:

nutrition industry, nutrition students, nutrition collaboration

Abstract

The European clinical nutrition market is a diverse and competitive industry which would significantly benefit from more conversations about and action towards collaboration between specialists. So far, investment in market research has been focussed on competition and innovation. While collaboration is considered key for the progress of the industry, it is often not prioritized. Professionals, students and new entrants into the European clinical nutrition market, as well as the lay population, would all benefit from increased collaboration. This work provides examples of how to nourish collaboration within the industry. More collaboration would foster increased consumer confidence, engagement, trust and industry growth. Barriers to collaboration include the current dominance of competitive over collaborative working environments.

References

Mordor Intelligence (2022). Europe Clinical Nutrition Market-Growth, Trends, Covid-19 Impact, and Forecasts 2022-2027. Available from: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/europemedical-clinical-nutrition-market-industry. Accessed 27.03.2022

Deloitte (2019). Global Wellness Report. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/sg/Documents/consumer-business/sea-cb-health-nwellness-progress-report-2019.pdf. Accessed 27.03.2022

Foley, H., Steel, A., Cramer, H. et al. Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 9, 1573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38279-8https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38279-8

Andrea M. Warren, Shilpa V. Constantinides, Christine E. Blake, Edward A. Frongillo, Advancing knowledge about stakeholder engagement in multisectoral nutrition research, Global Food Security, Volume 29, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100521.

Egan MC, Kaufman M. Financing nutrition services in a competitive market. J Am Diet Assoc. 1985 Feb;85(2):210-5. PMID: 3968359.

Institute of Food Science and Technology (2021). Technology offers sustainable nutrition solutions. Available from: https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsat.3501_8.x. Accessed 27.03.2022

Stenzinger A, Alber M, Allgäuer M, Jurmeister P, Bockmayr M, Budczies J, Lennerz J, Eschrich J, Kazdal D, Schirmacher P, Wagner AH, Tacke F, Capper D, Müller KR, Klauschen F. Artificial intelligence and pathology: From principles to practice and future applications in histomorphology and molecular profiling. Semin Cancer Biol. (2021) Feb 22:S1044-579X(21)00034-1. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.02.011. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33631297.

Schubert M and Turner L (2020). The Future of Digital Pathology. Available from: https://thepathologist.com/inside-the-lab/the-future-of-digital-pathology. Accessed 27.03.2022

Ellis A, Rozga M, Braakhuis A, Monnard CR, Robinson K, Sinley R, Wanner A, Vargas AJ. Effect of Incorporating Genetic Testing Results into Nutrition Counseling and Care on Health Outcomes: An Evidence Analysis Center Systematic Review-Part II. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Mar;121(3):582-605.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PMID: 32624396.

Sakamoto, Taro et al. (2020). A narrative review of digital pathology and artificial intelligence: focusing on lung cancer. Translational lung cancer research vol. 9,5: 2255-2276. doi:10.21037/tlcr-20-591

Sparling TM, Cheng B, Deeney M, Santoso MV, Pfeiffer E, Emerson JA, Amadi FM, Mitu K, Corvalan C, Verdeli H, Araya R, Kadiyala S. Global Mental Health and Nutrition: Moving Toward a Convergent Research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;9:722290. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722290. PMID: 34722437; PMCID: PMC8548935.

Arentz S. Professional unity and evidence; two agents of change. AJHNM 2019; 31(2):54-55

Fazey I L. Bunse, J. Msika, M. Pinke, K. Preedy, A.C. Evely, E. Lambert, E.Hastings, S. Morris, M.S. Reed (2013). Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Global Environ. Change. Available from: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012. Accessed 27.03.2022

Mallery, D. Ganachari, L. Smeeding, J. Fernandez, D. Lavallee, J. Siegel, S. Robinson, M. (2012). Moon PHP5 innovative methods for stakeholder engagement: an environmental scan Value Health, 15 (2012), p. A14

K. Oliver, A. Kothari, N. Mays (2019). The dark side of co production: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res. Pol. Syst. 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3

Alderwick, H., Hutchings, A., Briggs, A. et al. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and nonhealth care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health 21, 753 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1

Woulfe J, Oliver TR, Zahner SJ, Siemering KQ. Multisector partnerships in population health improvement. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A119. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995601/ 26

Alhassan JAK, Gauvin L, Judge A, Fuller D, Engler-Stringer R, Muhajarine N. Improving health through multisectoral collaboration: enablers and barriers. Can J Public Health. 2021 Dec;112(6):1059-1068. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00534-3. Epub 2021 Jun 8. PMID: 34105113; PMCID: PMC8651820. https://link.springer.com/article/10.17269/s41997-021-00534-3

McVicar KL, Ivanitskaya LV, Bradley DW, Montero JT. Primary care and public health collaboration reports: a qualitative review of integration aims, participants, and success determinants. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22(5):422–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2018.0160.

Department of Health and Social Care. Integration and innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all. 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-improvehealth-and-social-care-for-all/integration-and-innovation-working-together-to-improve-health-and-socialcare-for-all-html-version

DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Mirtallo JM, Tobin BW, Hark L, Van Horn L, Palmer CA. Challenges and opportunities for nutrition education and training in the health care professions: intraprofessional and interprofessional call to action. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(5 Suppl):1184S-93S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.073536

J. Jerling, D. Pelletier, J. Fanzo, N. Covic (2016). Supporting multisectoral action: capacity and nutrition leadership challenges facing Africa Achieving a Nutrition Revolution for Africa: the Road to Healthier Diets and Optimal Nutrition, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. (2016), pp. 147-169

Pullman ME, Verma R, Goodale JC. Service design and operations strategy formulation in multicultural markets. J Oper Manag. 2001;19:239–254. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00059-0.

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (2017). Scope of Practice for the Registered Dietitian Nutritionist. Available from: https://www.jandonline.org/article/S2212-2672(17)31624-6/fulltext. Accessed 27.03.2022

Koster, F., Verheijden, M. & Baartmans, J. The power of communication. Modifying behaviour: effectively influencing nutrition patterns of patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, S17–S22 (2005).

Rosser, W. Seeking the balance between individual and community-based nutritional interventions. Eur J Clin Nutr59, S102–S105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602181

Downloads

Published

2022-05-12

How to Cite

Garduno-Diaz, & Frost. (2022). Competitive vs Collaborative Clinical Nutritionists: The European Clinical Nutrition Market. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12265