Maintaining Humanism in Virtual Clinical Education: Implementation of Meaningful Virtual Simulations

Authors

  • Nisha Nair California State University, Fresno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.95.10961

Abstract

Virtual human simulation is a recent addition to the educational arsenal that involves human role players interacting with learners in a wide range of experiential learning via virtual platforms. Standardized or simulated virtual patients (SVPs) portray actual patients presenting specific clinical scenarios. After the simulation, SVPs can provide timely feedback to students to help improve clinical performance.  A pilot study was done with 3rd-semester undergraduate nursing students during their maternal newborn practicum. The scenario was developed based on clinical experience using cognitive task analysis. Participants provided feedback (face and content validity) after participating in the simulated tasks. The performance of virtual patients in the scenario was evaluated for consistency reliability by examiners. Inter-rater reliability was also tested to determine the agreement between examiners' evaluations. The study will extend an ongoing effort to involve multiple cohorts by implementing the Virtual Patient Simulation Tool to make evidence-based, shared decisions and involve patient input in the design of the VP simulation.

References

McMullen, M., Wilson, R., Fleming, M., Mark, D., Sydor, D., Wang, L., ... Burjorjee, J. E. (2016). “Debriefing-ondemand”: A pilot assessment of using a “pause button” in medical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare, 11(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000140.

Alexander, M. (2020). Building the next generation of nurses and nursing educators in a COVID-19 world. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 11(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2155-8256(20)30128-9.

National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2020). Policy brief: US nursing leadership supports practice/academic partnerships to assist the nursing workforce during the COVID-19 crisis. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/Policy_Brief_US_Nursing_Leadership_COVID19.pdf.

MacKinnon, K., Marcellus, L., Rivers, J., Gordon, C., Ryan, M., Butcher, D., 2015. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 13 (1), 14–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694

Dubovi, I. (2018). Designing for online computer-based clinical simulations: Evaluations of instructional approaches. Nurse Education Today, 69, 67–73.

Knopf-Amelung, S., Gotham, H., Kuofie, A., Young, P., Manney Stinson, R., Lynn, J.,Barker, K., & Hildreth, J. (2018). Comparison of Instructional Methods for Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Substance Use in Nursing Education. Nurse Educator, 43(3), 123–127.

Hill A, Davidson B, Theodoros D. A review of standardized patients in clinical education: Implications for speechlanguage pathology programs. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12(3):259–70. doi:10.3109/17549500903082445.

Finch E, Fleming J, Brown K, Lethlean J, Cameron A, McPhail S. The confidence of speech-language pathology students regarding communicating with people with aphasia. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(92). doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-92.

Holt, D. T., Helfrich, C. D., Hall, C. G., & Weiner, B. J. (2010). Are you ready? How health professionals can comprehensively conceptualize readiness for change. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(Suppl 1), 50–55. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19 Suppl 2:i34.

Aper L, Reniers J, Derese A, Veldhuijzen W. Managing the complexity of doing it all: an exploratory study on students’ experiences when trained stepwise in conducting consultations. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:206.

Clapper, T. C., & Leighton, K. (2020). Incorporating the reflective pause in simulation: A practical guide. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 51(1), 32–38. https:// doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20191217-07.

Fink, M. C., Reitmeier, V., Stadler, M., Siebeck, M., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2021). Assessment of Diagnostic Competences With Standardized Patients Versus Virtual Patients: Experimental Study in the Context of History Taking. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e21196–e21196. https://doi.org/10.2196/21196

Witt, M. A., McGaughan, K., & Smaldone, A. (2018). Standardized patient simulation experiences improves mental health assessment and communication. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 23, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.08.002.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-10

How to Cite

Nair, N. (2021). Maintaining Humanism in Virtual Clinical Education: Implementation of Meaningful Virtual Simulations. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(5), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.95.10961